---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4512/#review14748
---
Ship it!
This gets a ship it! from me based on the resolver
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4511/#review14749
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jonathan Rose
On March 17, 2015, 10:04
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4511/#review14751
---
Ship it!
/branches/13/res/res_pjsip_messaging.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4500/#review14750
---
Ship it!
I'm in the same boat as Matt on this one, but I'll
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4189/
---
(Updated March 19, 2015, 4:53 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4497/
---
(Updated March 19, 2015, 5:19 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Hi,
We are getting the following error with asterisk 12 and 13:
[Mar 19 10:14:08] ERROR[40185]: pjsip:0 ?: except.c .!!!FATAL:
unhandled exception PJLIB/No memory!
Can you please advise if I can either increase the memory for PJLIB or the best
way to identify what is causing the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4491/
---
(Updated March 19, 2015, 4:40 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On 3/19/2015 6:38 AM, Ross Beer wrote:
We are getting the following error with asterisk 12 and 13:
[Mar 19 10:14:08] ERROR[40185]: pjsip:0 ?: except.c .!!!FATAL:
unhandled exception PJLIB/No memory!
Ross,
Is there an associated issue in Jira? https://issues.asterisk.org/
Kind
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4391/
---
(Updated March 20, 2015, 2:34 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On Jan. 30, 2015, 1:22 a.m., George Joseph wrote:
If you run the Testsuite, you'll get a good indication of whether this is
truly backwards compatible.
gareth wrote:
I ran the test apps/queue/set_penalty which makes use of ami.command and
it failed.
However this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4500/#review14754
---
Thanks for taking a look. I plan to give this review a couple
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4503/#review14752
---
As an update - when testing with my external connectivity
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4515/#review14755
---
/trunk/channels/chan_sip.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4515/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24871
On March 18, 2015, 12:39 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
branches/11/apps/app_confbridge.c, lines 1847-1853
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4477/diff/2/?file=72633#file72633line1847
Swaping which plays first will allow the channel's prompt to be
interruptable. Although doing this will
Hi Sean,
I was just about to pose the reference:
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24893
I have just uploaded a backtrace for the latest crash.
I would be extremely grateful if you could take a look.
Kind regards,
Ross
To: asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com
From: sean.bri...@gmail.com
On March 17, 2015, 9:44 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
Everything looks good here. Should this review stay open for the external
extensions to be added, or will that be a separate review?
Jonathan Rose wrote:
I'll leave both reviews open for now.
I'm finally testing with these with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4504/#review14741
---
Looks good. I'm finally testing with these with outside
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4512/
---
(Updated March 19, 2015, 6:36 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On March 16, 2015, 1:57 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/13/configs/basic-pbx/extensions.conf, lines 36-42
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4488/diff/1/?file=72117#file72117line36
Does this really need to be a separate context?
I'm all for having contexts break up
On Jan. 29, 2015, 7:22 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
If you run the Testsuite, you'll get a good indication of whether this is
truly backwards compatible.
gareth wrote:
I ran the test apps/queue/set_penalty which makes use of ami.command and
it failed.
However this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4513/#review14745
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matt Jordan
On March 18, 2015, 4:51
On March 17, 2015, 11:57 a.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/tags/13.2.0/include/asterisk/codec.h, lines 77-80
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4505/diff/1/?file=72588#file72588line77
I don't think you can trust that the codec will know its endianness.
Looking at the resample code, I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4500/#review14747
---
I looked through everything, and it all made sense to me - but
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4510/
---
(Updated March 19, 2015, 4:59 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4477/
---
(Updated March 19, 2015, 4:59 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4473/
---
(Updated March 19, 2015, 10:59 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4514/
---
(Updated March 19, 2015, 10:16 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
29 matches
Mail list logo
