Re: [asterisk-dev] Anyone interested in having file/line number shown in dialplan show output?

2016-12-07 Thread Jonathan Rose
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Corey Farrell wrote: > Overall I like it. I think leaving pbx_ael out of this is best as it > might not be straight forward. Anyone who wants pbx_ael to provide > information about config sources can create a follow-up patch once the > core functionality is imple

Re: [asterisk-dev] Anyone interested in having file/line number shown in dialplan show output?

2016-12-07 Thread Corey Farrell
Overall I like it. I think leaving pbx_ael out of this is best as it might not be straight forward. Anyone who wants pbx_ael to provide information about config sources can create a follow-up patch once the core functionality is implemented. Some thoughts: * It would be nice if the registrar ("p

[asterisk-dev] Anyone interested in having file/line number shown in dialplan show output?

2016-12-07 Thread Jonathan Rose
I've been working through a lot of complicated dialplan setups lately, mostly written in AEL. Doing so has left me painfully aware of the fact that it can sometimes be hard to trace a dialplan through its various extensions. More so in pbx_ael of course where what you write isn't necessarily matche

Re: [asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

2016-12-07 Thread George Joseph
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:34 AM, George Joseph wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Matt Fredrickson >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: >>> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, at 10:43 AM, George Josep

Re: [asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

2016-12-07 Thread George Joseph
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Matt Fredrickson > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, at 10:43 AM, George Joseph wrote: >> >> We just discovered that the PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbo

Re: [asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

2016-12-07 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Matt Fredrickson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, at 10:43 AM, George Joseph wrote: > >> We just discovered that the PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command really > >> only dumps all aors regardless of whether th

[asterisk-dev] Recommended change to pjproject config_site.h

2016-12-07 Thread George Joseph
"*A problem was reported to the Asterisk project where transactions were not **found when they should have been [1]. In the issue an incoming INVITE transaction is CANCELed but the INVITE transaction cannot be found so a 481 response is returned for the CANCEL. The problematic calls have a '_' **