Re: [asterisk-dev] ARI, Stasis, and Dialplan

2019-02-04 Thread Ben Ford
Hey there, The short answer is "yes" to both. The plan is to have this change in 13, 16, and master. Once it is done with the review process and merged into the branches, the next release we cut will contain these changes. As for the appname and the dialplan entry that's automatically added, that'

Re: [asterisk-dev] ARI, Stasis, and Dialplan

2019-02-04 Thread Dan Jenkins
Ah so just to confirm - above in the thread theres a variable in the url passed in called context so that you could have an app name of foo but a context of bar and also an ari application without a context called alice and therefore alice could still be addressable from dialplan. So do we want the

Re: [asterisk-dev] ARI, Stasis, and Dialplan

2019-02-04 Thread Ben Ford
With the current approach, the context is now reliant on the appname, and if you are wanting to do "automatic" entry into Stasis with an endpoint, the only context that will matter is the one automatically created on application launch. Say your application is "master". When it's launched, you'll h

[asterisk-dev] Problem with DAHDI 3.0.0

2019-02-04 Thread Daniel McFarlane
Hello, I hope someone can help me as I've been struggling with this for almost 2 days now and am unable to find anything that works in my web searches. I am trying to upgrade my test system from Asterisk 11 to Asterisk 16.1.1, along with dahdi-linux-complete-3.0.0+3.0.0 and libpri-1.6.0 (wit

Re: [asterisk-dev] Problem with DAHDI 3.0.0

2019-02-04 Thread Malcolm Davenport
Howdy, Support for the TDM410, among others, was removed from the DAHDI 3.x driver packages. Those cards went end of sale on February 1 of 2014, and Digium (Sangoma) do not test them as a part of any releases. The README (iirc) in the package should list the cards still supported in the 3.x rele