On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
wrote:
This is funny. In 11 pjproject is bundled (though patching it out is not
an issue). In 12 it is not included in the tree anymore.
I
On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:23 AM, David M. Lee d...@digium.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
wrote:
This is funny. In 11 pjproject is bundled (though patching it out is
: David M. Lee
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 5:30 PM
To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] CentOS packaging
On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:23 AM, David M. Lee d...@digium.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.comwrote:
Nothing wrong with embedded libraries if the system libraries can be
used instead (preferably: by default). This is the case with editline
as of asterisk 11. The system copy of libedit can be used now.
Now if I
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
I would
love to see patches proposed for Asterisk that removed some of the
external libraries (editline and mxml are two that come readily
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
Yep, it's only a question of someone having the time to do the work,
which hasn't been me.
Well, I made some time today. And I've made pretty good progress. As
always, you can follow along at
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, David M. Lee d...@digium.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
wrote:
This is funny. In 11 pjproject is bundled (though patching it out is
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.co.uk wrote:
After a conversation with Rusty last week, I've become aware that for a
simple installation of asterisk (11) from the CentOS repositories at
http://packages.asterisk.org/centos/, the 'current' repo at
On 02/26/2014 02:02 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:04:26PM -0500, Sean Darcy wrote:
On 02/25/2014 02:03 PM, Ben Langfeld wrote:
After a conversation with Rusty last week, I've become aware that for a
simple installation of asterisk (11) from the CentOS repositories at
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.me wrote:
Unfortunately those packages are of Asterisk 1.8:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/asterisk.html. That's
a total no-go for
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:26:02AM -0600, Matthew Jordan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.co.uk wrote:
After a conversation with Rusty last week, I've become aware that for a
simple installation of asterisk (11) from the CentOS repositories at
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:56:03AM -0600, Matthew Jordan wrote:
If that is the policy of Fedora, then quite frankly, it should just
stop including packages of Asterisk. There have been embedded
libraries in Asterisk all the way back to version 1.0.0 - and if the
Fedora packagers are going to
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.comwrote:
This is funny. In 11 pjproject is bundled (though patching it out is not
an issue). In 12 it is not included in the tree anymore.
I know, and the humor isn't lost on me. :-) That being said, I'm hoping to
get the
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
If the packages were restructured, it could be set up so that Asterisk
only provides chan_dahdi in a subpackage - although there are
obviously some issues with subpackages as well. I'm still not sure of
a good
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
If the packages were restructured, it could be set up so that Asterisk
only provides chan_dahdi in a subpackage - although there are
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
(1) I fully appreciate the annoyance of having embedded libraries in
Asterisk. While some of those embedded libraries may be difficult to
extract, some - most likely - could be removed at this point. I would
love to
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:51:29PM -0500, Jared Smith wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
(1) I fully appreciate the annoyance of having embedded libraries in
Asterisk. While some of those embedded libraries may be difficult to
extract, some -
Thank you very much for the offer, but unless these would become the
official packages, I don't think that would serve the purpose I'm trying to
raise in this thread, which is to simplify the official community install
method to a single repository. For my cases I can work around this
complexity,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 08:48:49AM -0500, Jared Smith wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.me wrote:
Unfortunately those packages are of Asterisk 1.8:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/asterisk.html.
That's a total no-go for me, I'm
After a conversation with Rusty last week, I've become aware that for a
simple installation of asterisk (11) from the CentOS repositories at
http://packages.asterisk.org/centos/, the 'current' repo at
http://packages.digium.com/centos is required to satisfy the dependency of
the 'asterisk' package
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.co.uk wrote:
After a conversation with Rusty last week, I've become aware that for a
simple installation of asterisk (11) from the CentOS repositories at
http://packages.asterisk.org/centos/, the 'current' repo at
Unfortunately those packages are of Asterisk 1.8:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/asterisk.html.
That's a total no-go for me, I'm afraid, but thanks for the suggestion :)
On 25 February 2014 17:04, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:03
On Tuesday 25 February 2014 15:04:12 Jared Smith wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.co.uk wrote:
After a conversation with Rusty last week, I've become aware that for a
simple installation of asterisk (11) from the CentOS repositories at
On 02/25/2014 02:03 PM, Ben Langfeld wrote:
After a conversation with Rusty last week, I've become aware that for a
simple installation of asterisk (11) from the CentOS repositories at
http://packages.asterisk.org/centos/, the 'current' repo at
http://packages.digium.com/centos is required to
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:04:26PM -0500, Sean Darcy wrote:
On 02/25/2014 02:03 PM, Ben Langfeld wrote:
After a conversation with Rusty last week, I've become aware that for a
simple installation of asterisk (11) from the CentOS repositories at
http://packages.asterisk.org/centos/, the
25 matches
Mail list logo
