It's not binded with Asterisk, but I'm behind a satellite
connection, and regullar faxes works - but with CISCO
equipment...
On 28 July 2006 20:23, John Lange wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 09:08 -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > Faxes are more of a problem because their lower-end
> > connectio
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Candler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Olivier Krief" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] Routing data modem calls
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:49:14PM +0200, Olivier Krief
On Friday 28 July 2006 05:27, Brian Candler wrote:
> Furthermore, a G.711 call uses a large bandwidth (up to ~120kbps), even for
> a low data rate modem, or when no data is being transmitted. A typical ADSL
> line has an uplink capacity of 288kbps, so 2 calls would eat all that up.
?? Most ADSL l
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:49:14PM +0200, Olivier Krief wrote:
> In many cases, I noticed (though I didn't experienced) data modems could
> simply be replaced by serial-to-ethernet converters plus dialup routers.
> What do you think of that ?
That won't work for me:
(1) EPOS terminals may have m
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:27:58AM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> Does anyone know if there's a standard mechanism for carrying data modem
> calls over a VoIP-type network? I know there's T.38 for fax, but I have not
> been able to find something equivalent for generic data modem calls.
To answer m
Hi,
In many cases, I noticed (though I didn't experienced) data modems could
simply be replaced by serial-to-ethernet converters plus dialup routers.
What do you think of that ?
Regards
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
a
