Re: [asterisk-users] user entry as variables

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Michael wrote: > I want to take series of user entered (via phone keypad) options/numeric > entry fields and use these with an AGI script. I have looked through > voip-info and I can't find any Asterisk functions specifically for this. Try "show agi" (1.2) or "agi show" (1.

[asterisk-users] AsteriskNOW-1.5.0-beta1 Installation Error

I am getting the following error during AsteriskNow installation I am using the following AsteriskNOW-1.5.0-beta1-i386-1of1.iso Here is the error I could piece together as I don't have access to the screen: EIP: [] powernow8k_init Kernel panic - not syncing

[asterisk-users] Asterisk AGX addons compile issues

Has anyone seen this before, and know what is happening? u...@host:~/asterisk/agx-ast-addons# ./build.sh -- Configuring done -- Generating done -- Build files have been written to: /root/asterisk/agx-ast-addons [ 11%] Building C object CMakeFiles/app_devstate.dir/app_devstate.o Linking C shared mo

[asterisk-users] user entry as variables

I want to take series of user entered (via phone keypad) options/numeric entry fields and use these with an AGI script. I have looked through voip-info and I can't find any Asterisk functions specifically for this. Any guidance please? Michael ___ --

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Darryl Dunkin wrote: > Steve Edwards wrote: > Top posting. Bottom posting. Honestly, if you can't use an effing > scrollbar, please tell me so I can take you out back and beat you to > death with something heavy. The .5 seconds it takes to scroll from one > end of a message to

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On December 17, 2008 06:59:19 pm David fire wrote: > you are soamming my mail box whit this useless discution > the solution is doble posting (top and bottom) It's a public mailing list. If you're having trouble managing it, you may want to try a digest version, or perhaps a moderated list. -A.

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Everyone read this top down for your IVR wav file. Press 9 for the company directory Press 8 for the billing department Press 1 for technical support Press 0 for the operator Next let us know who calls into your PBX complaining that your menu is whacked. Now discussing PBX related issues, that is

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

you are soamming my mail box whit this useless discution the solution is doble posting (top and bottom) 2008/12/17 Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) > On December 17, 2008 05:03:00 pm Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: > > To me top posting is like people talking about "SIP Trunks". There is > > no such th

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On December 17, 2008 05:03:00 pm Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: > To me top posting is like people talking about "SIP Trunks". There is > no such thing as a "SIP Trunk". There are SIP connections, peers, > friends, etc. The term is simply a marketing buzzword to make people > that don't know mu

Re: [asterisk-users] Record CMD

>> Exactly! but sadly these variables don't seem to exists as far as I can >> tell > > The point is that you're the first person to make this request. If nobody > had > the idea to do it before you, that is precisely the reason it never got > done. > Now that it has been requested, it is in queu

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Steve Edwards wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Danny Nicholas wrote: > > >> OSUR GONNA BE ABLE TO MAKE PEOPLE STOP POSTING. IF DIGIUM GETS ENOUGH OF >> THESE STUPID HITS, THEY WILL CUT THIS OFF. I KNOW I'M SHOUTING, I'M >> @#$###$# TIRED OF INTERRUPTING IMPORTANT WORK TO READ NOTHING. THAT'S WHA

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

RE Kushner List Account wrote: > Paul Hales wrote: > >>> In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't >>> repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time >>> a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! >>> >>> >>> >>> >> I am strongly

Re: [asterisk-users] Record CMD

On Tuesday 16 December 2008 14:51:47 Barton Fisher wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Tilghman Lesher" > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 10:40 AM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Record CMD > > > On Monday 15 December 2

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Danny Nicholas wrote: > OSUR GONNA BE ABLE TO MAKE PEOPLE STOP POSTING. IF DIGIUM GETS ENOUGH OF > THESE STUPID HITS, THEY WILL CUT THIS OFF. I KNOW I'M SHOUTING, I'M > @#$###$# TIRED OF INTERRUPTING IMPORTANT WORK TO READ NOTHING. THAT'S WHAT > MSN IS FOR. Spoken like a t

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Paul Hales wrote: >> In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't >> repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time >> a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! >> >> >> > I am strongly against anyone posting anything with their bottom. > >

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

> > In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't > repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time > a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! > > I am strongly against anyone posting anything with their bottom. later, PaulH __

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Bill Andersen wrote: > In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't > repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time > a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! > > ./bill > > Posting either way can be good, bad, or

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

OSUR GONNA BE ABLE TO MAKE PEOPLE STOP POSTING. IF DIGIUM GETS ENOUGH OF THESE STUPID HITS, THEY WILL CUT THIS OFF. I KNOW I'M SHOUTING, I'M @#$###$# TIRED OF INTERRUPTING IMPORTANT WORK TO READ NOTHING. THAT'S WHAT MSN IS FOR. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digiu

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 to AS5400 using H.323 (ooh323) inbound working but outbound doesn't

You can do a translation rule on the outbound peer, like voice translation-rule 10 rule 1 /.*/ /\0/ type any national plan any isdn voice translation-profile SET_Type&Plan translate calling 10 {or} translate called 10 (whatweven you want to change) and in the DS3 trunk if you have a tr

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On 12/17/2008 Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: > You're not going to be able to make people stop top posting and I'm > not > going to be able to make people stop using wrong or misleading terms > like "SIP Trunk". If you try all you are going to do is piss people > off > and stress yourself ou

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Barry L. Kline wrote: > Bill Andersen wrote: > >> In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't >> repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time >> a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! >> >> ./bill > > Not when you take the time to properly t

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 07:03:15PM -0200, David fire wrote: > 2008/12/17 Barry L. Kline > > > Bill Andersen wrote: > > > > > In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't > > > repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time > > > a question is asked either... Bottom p

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

2008/12/17 Barry L. Kline > Bill Andersen wrote: > > > In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't > > repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time > > a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! > > > > ./bill > > Not when you take the time to pr

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT one way audio

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Silvia Menendez wrote: > Hello may situation is the next: > > Asterisk <--> NAT1 (router)<---> internet <--> NAT2 (router) <--> x-lite > ^ >| > ip phone (cisco) > > Asterisk and de ci

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 to AS5400 using H.323 (ooh323) inbound working but outbound doesn't

I have the following setup: DS3 -> Cisco AS5400 -> H.323 (ooh323) -> Asterisk Inbound calls work great but outbound calls fail. So to check and make sure we have outbound calling ability on the DS3 we setup a Cisco Call Manager Express and it can make outbound calls both local and long distance

Re: [asterisk-users] Installing Asterisk v1.6 on Ubuntu Intrepid?

Scott, I had the same problem when I downloaded http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/asterisk-1.6-current.tar.gz This downloaded asterisk-1.6.0.2.tar.gz To fix the problem I downloaded http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/asterisk-1.6.0.3-rc1.tar.gz and I was able to compile without any

Re: [asterisk-users] ael queue gosub already has PBX structure??

2008/12/17 Mark Michelson > Giedrius Augys wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I want that after client and queue member call would be established, > > cmd queue runs some 'procedures' . So I am using cmd Queue option > > 'gosub'. This is my example of ael : > > > > context QUEUE { > > _X. => { > >

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Bill Andersen wrote: > In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't > repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time > a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! > > ./bill Not when you take the time to properly trim your reply it's not. BK _

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

OR Q: What is the most annoying thing in email? Q: What is the most annoying thing in email? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in email? A: Top-posting. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? Q: What is the most annoying thing in email? A: Top-posting. Q: Why is top-posting su

Re: [asterisk-users] ael queue gosub already has PBX structure??

Giedrius Augys wrote: > Hello, > > I want that after client and queue member call would be established, > cmd queue runs some 'procedures' . So I am using cmd Queue option > 'gosub'. This is my example of ael : > > context QUEUE { > _X. => { > Ringing(); > Wait(4); >

[asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT one way audio

Hello may situation is the next: Asterisk <--> NAT1 (router)<---> internet <--> NAT2 (router) <--> x-lite ^ | ip phone (cisco) Asterisk and de cisco phone are in the same LAN. I want to make a call between the x-lite a

[asterisk-users] ael queue gosub already has PBX structure??

Hello, I want that after client and queue member call would be established, cmd queue runs some 'procedures' . So I am using cmd Queue option 'gosub'. This is my example of ael : context QUEUE { _X. => { Ringing(); Wait(4); Answer(); Queue(${Queue},wr,,,60,,,

Re: [asterisk-users] How to tell when a issue actually gets in a released version

Jerry Geis schrieb: > This bug report http://bugs.digium.com/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=12038 > apparently has been fixed. > > I dont see anything on the page saying what released version of asterisk > this is in. > > How can I tell that? It (svnbot) says: > U branches/1.4/main/dial.c > > --

[asterisk-users] How to tell when a issue actually gets in a released version

This bug report http://bugs.digium.com/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=12038 apparently has been fixed. I dont see anything on the page saying what released version of asterisk this is in. How can I tell that? jerry ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided

[asterisk-users] Install app_rxfax and app_txfax in 1.4 with Lenny

Hi, I've read README file in agx-ast-addons-1.4.17.5.tar.bz2 It says "Install libTiff >=3.8 and <4.0" Should you really use this agx-ast-addons to get app_rxfax and app-_txfax running with latest 1.4.22 ? If positive, should you take this libtiff warning into account ? If positive, where can you

Re: [asterisk-users] Packet size limit for HDLC?

Hi, I figured out, that app_pppd suffered from overruns under "high" out traffic. ("ping -s 600 " was already high in this context.) I've just made a quick and dirty hack to fix it. If interested, just download the original package by Sirrix (as mentioned on VoIP-Wiki) and the replace their app_p

Re: [asterisk-users] RDNIS and asterisk

The original poster is looking for RDNIS as the number initially dialed, i.e. the DNIS recognized by the first PSTN switch handling the call. The call may have been diverted to a different number, e.g. unconditionally forwarded to a call center (answering service, for us older types). If there are

Re: [asterisk-users] RDNIS and asterisk

If the diversion takes place in asterisk then the dialplan can set a variable before it diverts and then use that variable at the destination of the diversion. -- Jim Dickenson mailto:dicken...@cfmc.com CfMC http://www.cfmc.com/ > From: Julian Lyndon-Smith > Reply-To: , Asterisk Users Mailing

[asterisk-users] PostgreSQL CDRs 1.6 (was: Re: 1.6 upgrade issues)

Chris Bagnall schrieb: > Also seem to be getting some errors writing CDRs to a postgresql database. What errors precisely? How can you tell? > I'm using the schema for pgsql from voip-info.org, which, again, has worked > fine logging 1.2 and 1.4. Have there been any schema changes in 1.6 one ne

Re: [asterisk-users] Alcatel OXE + Asterisk as external IVR

2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Olivier wrote: > > 2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus > >> Is anyone using the $subject setup? > >> > >> What I would like to do the following setup: > >> 1. OXE is setup for receiving calls, handling Agents > >> 2. Asterisk as external IVR

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 upgrade issues

> It is precisely relevant to this issue. All subroutines, whether they're > called macros or not, in AEL (in 1.6) are Gosub routines. So to invoke that > subroutine, you need to call out with Gosub, not with Macro. So it probably > should be along the lines of: Gosub(outbound,s,1 > (${EXTEN},p

Re: [asterisk-users] WTB: Digium 1 or 4 ports E1 Cards

http://shop.ebay.com/items/_W0QQ_nkwZdigiumQQ_armrsZ1QQ_fromZR40QQ_mdoZ 2008/12/17 Pete Kay > Hi, > > I am looking to buy 2 used 1 or 4 ports E1 Cards. If you have one, would > you please contact me? > > Thanks, > Pete > > ___ > -- Bandwidth and Colo

Re: [asterisk-users] Alcatel OXE + Asterisk as external IVR

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Olivier wrote: > 2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus >> Is anyone using the $subject setup? >> >> What I would like to do the following setup: >> 1. OXE is setup for receiving calls, handling Agents >> 2. Asterisk as external IVR on extension 9xxx connected with ISDN (Q.9

Re: [asterisk-users] RDNIS and asterisk

-->> Where are you actually doing the diverting? In Asterisk at the telco -->> exchange? ...or at... ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update op

Re: [asterisk-users] RDNIS and asterisk

Where are you actually doing the diverting? In Asterisk at the telco exchange? -->> -Original Message- -->> From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- -->> boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Julian Lyndon-Smith -->> Sent: 17 December 20

Re: [asterisk-users] RDNIS and asterisk

No, ${exten} is the final destination number myphone calls 123456, which is diverted to 22334455 would givc an ${exten} of 22334455, but I wanted to know the 123456. Julian Andrew Thomas wrote: > Isn't that the ${exten} number? In other words, the number called. > > > > -->> ---

Re: [asterisk-users] libpri and NT-Point to multi-point

I would say the 'norm' in the UK is TE-ptp and NT-ptp or NT-ptmp (depends what is on the end of the port(s)). If using NT-ptmp, then a 100ohm resistor is usually needed in the circuit somewhere - aka ISDN balun - (unless the card has this facility - like the B410P has). HTH Andy -Original

Re: [asterisk-users] RDNIS and asterisk

Isn't that the ${exten} number? In other words, the number called. -->> -Original Message- -->> From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- -->> boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tony Mountifield -->> Sent: 17 December 2008 10:17 -->>

Re: [asterisk-users] Alcatel OXE + Asterisk as external IVR

2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus > Hi all! > > Is anyone using the $subject setup? > > What I would like to do the following setup: > 1. OXE is setup for receiving calls, handling Agents > 2. Asterisk as external IVR on extension 9xxx connected with ISDN (Q.931) > PRI > > The incoming calling route: >

Re: [asterisk-users] libpri and NT-Point to multi-point

2008/12/17 Andrew Thomas > I have piggy backed a few PBX's off the back of a B410P (4 x BRI) card with > no problems. The ones I used for testing were the Avaya IP Office, Siemens > Hi-Path/Hi-Com and various old Panasonics. > > All I had to do was to turn on the 100ohm termination on my S0 port

Re: [asterisk-users] RDNIS and asterisk

In article <49483005.8030...@dotr.com>, Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote: > I have a couple of numbers that are diverted to a number that is > conected to an isdn30 card, running asterisk 1.4. > > eg. > > 123456 => 22334455 > 654321 => 22334455 > > What I would like to know is the number of the orgin

Re: [asterisk-users] interesting problem

So what is the middle name that causes problems? atre you sure you don't have "strange" characters in it, like spaces, nonprintables, weird encodings, etc? l. In data Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:04 +0100, Eve Ellen Cole ha scritto: > I’ve got an interesting problem and am wondering if anyone

[asterisk-users] Alcatel OXE + Asterisk as external IVR

Hi all! Is anyone using the $subject setup? What I would like to do the following setup: 1. OXE is setup for receiving calls, handling Agents 2. Asterisk as external IVR on extension 9xxx connected with ISDN (Q.931) PRI The incoming calling route: 1. OXE handles incoming calls, answer 2. Transfe

Re: [asterisk-users] libpri and NT-Point to multi-point

I have piggy backed a few PBX's off the back of a B410P (4 x BRI) card with no problems. The ones I used for testing were the Avaya IP Office, Siemens Hi-Path/Hi-Com and various old Panasonics. All I had to do was to turn on the 100ohm termination on my S0 ports (set as NT on the B410P of cour

Re: [asterisk-users] libpri and NT-Point to multi-point

Hello Andrew, 2008/12/17 Andrew Thomas > If you are connecting to BRI lines then you should be TE - not NT. Yes of course, you're right. I was mostly referring to this : ISDN -- asterisk -- legacy PBX Then, in this case, as legacy PBX has a set of TE-PtmP or TE-PtP interface

Re: [asterisk-users] libpri and NT-Point to multi-point

If you are connecting to BRI lines then you should be TE - not NT. You can run as TE ptp or ptmp with mISDN (not sure about DAHDI yet - not tried the new release). HTH   -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] O

[asterisk-users] WTB: Digium 1 or 4 ports E1 Cards

Hi, I am looking to buy 2 used 1 or 4 ports E1 Cards. If you have one, would you please contact me? Thanks, Pete ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options vis

[asterisk-users] libpri and NT-Point to multi-point

Hi, At the moment, libpri /w Asterisk 1.6, Dahdi 2.1, is not supporting NT-Point to multi-point mode. Here (France), most small PBXes are connected to ISDN through BRI trunks in PtmP (don't know why but it seems the general case). So this NT-PtmP function would be very helpful to easily slide an A

Re: [asterisk-users] Some Good News for VoIP

On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:55:00 -0500, Drew Gibson wrote: > >http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/16/infonetics_enterprise_telephony_numbers_q3_2008/ ... whilst... ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Pro