On 12-08-15 16:31, A J Stiles wrote:
On Wednesday 12 Aug 2015, Jonas Kellens wrote:
Hello
I was wondering of it is possible to have Queue Agents with the same
priority (penalty) but with a certain order ?
So I have 20 Agents.
Agent 1 till Agent 10 has penalty 1.
Agent 11 till Agent 15 has p
On Wednesday 12 Aug 2015, Jonas Kellens wrote:
> Hello
>
> I was wondering of it is possible to have Queue Agents with the same
> priority (penalty) but with a certain order ?
>
> So I have 20 Agents.
>
> Agent 1 till Agent 10 has penalty 1.
>
> Agent 11 till Agent 15 has penalty 2.
> (only con
Hello
I was wondering of it is possible to have Queue Agents with the same
priority (penalty) but with a certain order ?
So I have 20 Agents.
Agent 1 till Agent 10 has penalty 1.
Agent 11 till Agent 15 has penalty 2.
(only contacted if 1 -> 10 are busy)
Agent 16 till Agent 20 has penalty 3.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015, at 09:34 AM, Rafael dos Santos Saraiva wrote:
> Hi
Kia ora,
> I need to set the number of incoming calls to one, but the outgoing
> calls
> should be unlimited. I think the busylevel parameter is for it(incoming
> calls), but not works. My config is:
The "busylevel" conf
Hi
I need to set the number of incoming calls to one, but the outgoing calls
should be unlimited. I think the busylevel parameter is for it(incoming
calls), but not works. My config is:
cat sip.conf
[general]
[template](!)
qualify=yes
cc_agent_policy=generic
cc_monitor_policy=generic
call-limit
Hi AJ
To try for a more numeric response I did a quick check on ShodanHQ shows
the following PBX counts - I am sure it is not a complete count but kind of
gives a minimum as many do not show the server type where Shodan can find
it.
*PBX type (search term) Count*
asterCC
139
A
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015, at 04:10 PM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> I have been banging my head against the wall for weeks now on this
> one. I have a switch running NetBSD and Asterisk 11.19.0 although I
> have had this problem on older versions as well. I, and my users, can
> call out, we can receive
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015, at 07:41 AM, Thyda ENG wrote:
> Dear Sir,
Kia ora,
>
> I current have done successfully with sip message over asterisk server ,
> and additionally now I want to send the image between sip using asterisk.
> Could any one share me how to config the asterisk for sending image f
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015, at 04:06 AM, Stefan Viljoen wrote:
> Hi Steve
>
> Just running about 50 calls??
>
> If I do
>
> lsof | grep asterisk | wc -l
>
> to narrow the realm of what is reported I still get just under 100 000
> files:
>
> lsof | grep asterisk | wc -l
> 95903
>
> with 50 calls run
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015, at 04:43 AM, Stefan Viljoen wrote:
> Hi Markus
>
> Thanks for the reply, I have set those files previously as well...
>
> It seems the problem for me is on my Centos 7 box that the Asterisk
> binary
> does not "know" that these are the limits, and imposes a 1024 open file
>
Dne 11.8.2015 v 12:18 Joshua Colp napsal(a):
Vinicius Fontes wrote:
I'm having the same issue! The difference in my case is Asterisk server
has a public IPv4 and the browser is behind a single NAT.
I'm forwarding my configuration below (which I posted previously on
asterisk-users).
How can we
Hi Tony
Thanks again for replying.
Ok, I've set the SYSMAXFILES and MAXFILES in the script, hopefully it will
have an effect.
Kind regards,
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:50:29 + (UTC)
From: t...@softins.co.uk (Tony Mountifield)
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [aster
Hi Markus
Thanks for the reply, I have set those files previously as well...
It seems the problem for me is on my Centos 7 box that the Asterisk binary
does not "know" that these are the limits, and imposes a 1024 open file
limit count for some reason.
It seems using prlimit to force the running
[Aug 11 21:57:14] WARNING[1992] translate.c: no samples for alawtolin
[Aug 11 21:57:14] WARNING[2005] translate.c: no samples for alawtolin
[Aug 11 21:57:15] WARNING[2027] translate.c: no samples for alawtolin
Hi to all,
I have an elastix box running asterisk 1.8.20 without problem. It's
about
Hi Steve
Just running about 50 calls??
If I do
lsof | grep asterisk | wc -l
to narrow the realm of what is reported I still get just under 100 000
files:
lsof | grep asterisk | wc -l
95903
with 50 calls running.
So apparently this is excessive? I can only guess that there must be a MAJOR
bug
15 matches
Mail list logo
