Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 14.0.0-rc1 Now Available

2016-09-19 Thread Joshua Colp
Marcelo Terres wrote: I noticed another different behaviour. In older versions, when I call rasterisk, I receive some informations about it. Fox example: [root@pbx2 ~]# rasterisk Asterisk 11.22.0, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2013 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer

Re: [asterisk-users] Ast 13.11.2 : bridgepeer variable empty ?

2016-09-19 Thread Ludovic Gasc
Hi Matt, Thank you for your explanation, it's clear to me. Nevertheless, it doesn't help me in my use case: I'm trying to collect all SIP callid and store that with cdr_adaptive_odbc. The business use case is to link Asterisk CDRs with logs from our operators via their API and our capture tool

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 14.0.0-rc1 Now Available

2016-09-19 Thread Marcelo Terres
Thanks Joshua. Marcelo H. Terres IM: mhter...@jabber.mundoopensource.com.br https://www.mundoopensource.com.br https://twitter.com/mhterres https://linkedin.com/in/marceloterres On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > Marcelo Terres wrote: >>

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 14.0.0-rc1 Now Available

2016-09-19 Thread Marcelo Terres
I noticed another different behaviour. In older versions, when I call rasterisk, I receive some informations about it. Fox example: [root@pbx2 ~]# rasterisk Asterisk 11.22.0, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2013 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer Asterisk comes with

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 14.0.0-rc1 Now Available

2016-09-19 Thread Joshua Colp
Marcelo Terres wrote: Hey dev team, kudos for the good job. Just one information. When I started Asterisk after upgrade to version 14, I received this information: [Sep 19 19:40:57] WARNING[22694]: res_odbc.c:525 load_odbc_config: The 'pooling', 'shared_connections', 'limit', and 'idlecheck'

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 14.0.0-rc1 Now Available

2016-09-19 Thread Marcelo Terres
One more thing about my last email: I think that you forgot to update the configs/samples/res_odbc.conf.sample file, because it still contains idlecheck and limit parameters. Regards, Marcelo H. Terres IM: mhter...@jabber.mundoopensource.com.br

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 14.0.0-rc1 Now Available

2016-09-19 Thread Marcelo Terres
Hey dev team, kudos for the good job. Just one information. When I started Asterisk after upgrade to version 14, I received this information: [Sep 19 19:40:57] WARNING[22694]: res_odbc.c:525 load_odbc_config: The 'pooling', 'shared_connections', 'limit', and 'idlecheck' options are deprecated.

Re: [asterisk-users] Ast 13.11.2 : bridgepeer variable empty ?

2016-09-19 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Jonas Kellens wrote: > Hello > > I can confirm that the variable DIALEDPEERNAME contains the information that > I would expect in the variable BRIDGEPEER. > > But I read nowhere that DIALEDPEERNAME has replaced BRIDGEPEER as of > Asterisk

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 14.0.0-rc1 Now Available

2016-09-19 Thread Asterisk Development Team
The Asterisk Development Team has announced the first release candidate of Asterisk 14.0.0. This release candidate is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The release of Asterisk 14.0.0-rc1 resolves several issues reported by the community and

Re: [asterisk-users] Tricking asterisk to think the call has ended, but it was continuing on the other side

2016-09-19 Thread Leandro Dardini
Unfortunately the only log messages regarding that channel are the "joined" and the "left" for both legs. VERBOSE[18771][C-066c] bridge_channel.c: Channel SIP/201-boxoffice-0f66 joined 'simple_bridge' basic-bridge <00bd58c3-3bce-4f1b-9d79-11eb96f37260> VERBOSE[18779][C-066c]

Re: [asterisk-users] Ast 13.11.2 : bridgepeer variable empty ?

2016-09-19 Thread Jonas Kellens
Hello I can confirm that the variable DIALEDPEERNAME contains the information that I would expect in the variable BRIDGEPEER. But I read nowhere that DIALEDPEERNAME has replaced BRIDGEPEER as of Asterisk version 13 ?! So if this is not the intention, then yes this is probably a bug and