Ive been racking my brain for the last two days to
try to figure out what I could possibly be doing wrong in my configuration for
a SIP trunk thats setup through my local ISPs Metaswitch. Ive
setup a very simple SIP Peer, which Ive played around with a lot in the
past two days but still
FYI, I've got a working version of asttapi that will work with Asterisk
1.2 up on my site at http://www.kirkhamsystems.com/asttapi . It's the
debug build, so it contains some extra code, but that's merely to help
me out if anyone sends in a bug report (which so far out of apparently
80 something
Yeah, that sounds about right. I can see advantages and disadvantages
to both. The main advantage I see to AstTapi besides signaling incoming
calls (which I haven't tested on my modified code, I guess I should work
on that) is that once you've setup a user in the Asterisk Management
interface
I've finished a patched version of asttapi that will work with asterisk
1.2. There were fundamental changes to the Asterisk Management
interface between 1.0 and 1.2 that broke asttapi. I think my patched
version will work on 1.0 and 1.2 branches, but I have no way of testing
since I don't have a
for something that works. All
our
systems are Asterisk 1.2.7.1
-Kerry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Clint Sharp
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:58 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Asttapi
, this one on 1.0.2.13 caps at about a third of the meter on ztmonitor. Is anyone else having this issue, or might this be a hardware issue with this particular phone?
ClintOn 3/1/06, Clint Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have one on 1.0.2.13 and one on
1.0.1.9. The one on 1.0.2.13 is
the one I can
Is anyone else having an issue with GXP-2000s and transmit gain? All my other phones are fine on my TDM400P with txgain set at 0, but the GXP-2000 caps at about a third of the scale in ztmonitor. I'm getting people complaining they can't hear me on my GXP-2000s, whereas my Snom 320 and Polycom 301
I had to drop 1.0.1.12 because it has a serious handset volume issue that seems to cut the handset volume in half. Fix one bug, cause another.
Clint
On 2/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Clint Sharp wrote: 2) GXP-2000: Not much better than the Budgetones
I also have the same issue on a TDM400B. This isn't a valid solution for us, because I don't want to give any sort of large business feel to our system (any sort of please hold kinda stuff would really turn off customers who are used to just getting an answer, even if it starts ringing again).
It's funny this thread has been coming up, because I've been testing out phones at my office, and I just did a fairly intensive quality test on them.1) Budgetones: Don't bother for a business setting. The speaker phone is basically useless (echo problems) and the handset is horrible. If you follow
If you can live without a speakerphone, the Polycom 301 is an excellent
phone and is only $30US more expensive than the GXP-2000s. I tend
to trust the Polycom brand, and they haven't really steered me wrong
yet in the IP phone hardware. I'm interested though in any
reports of success with the
I'm having a very hard time justifying trying to sell this to the SOHO
market on price or parity with key systems. I've installed key
systems and large scale PBXs, and while working around the SLA problem
isn't that hard, the price point for a key system is very hard to
compete with. I've never
I'm still having numerous echo issues, even on SIP calls, with the
GXP-2000s. Unfortunately, they cause echo on the remote end on SIP
calls, which does not occur on other phone models. The speaker phone
is unusable due to echo problems. Maybe the 1.0.2 firmware branches
will help, but I'm scared
Gerard Saraber wrote:
Thanks! testing it now, on my test calls it appears to start out with
less echo then the Mark3 canceler, but it trains slower, seems like it
took a long time for the echo to completely disappear, the real test
will be seeing what the people at my company have to say.
Feb
Ronald Hartmann wrote:
Anyone know if it is possible to control how aggressively the
Aggressive mode behaves.
Meaning, is it possible to dial back the aggressive mode to have a happy
medium between
Regular and the Aggressive defaults.
I have a situation where Normal echo cancellation is not
15 matches
Mail list logo
