Pretty sure Shaun Ruffell nailed it. It sounds like you have secure boot
enabled (systems designed to run Windows, which is just about everything
but a build-it-yourself PC, will enable this by default). This can usually
be turned off the the BIOS. The alternative is to get the module properly
sign
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 2:49 PM Dovid Bender wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been forever since I dealt with POTS lines. We have a client that
> needs FXS and FXO support. If memory serves correct we used the TDM400P
> with fxs_gs/fxo_gs. What's the equivalent of that card today?
>
Digium, Inc. Wildcard
Most spam calls are robocalls these days. At my house, I can block pretty
much all of the robocalls by requiring the caller to take some action
before ringing the phones. In our case, the action is just to dial 1 for my
wife or 2 for me. The only difference it makes in the end is which
voice mailbo
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 1:51 PM John Novack SCII_U
wrote:
> Doesn't DAHDI 3.0 remove support for a bunch of older cards, including the
> TDM400 and 410?
>
If it does, they have a funny way of implementing it, since the proper
modules are still being loaded.
This is a $600+ card, which is about 2
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 12:17 PM Malcolm Davenport
wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> There's a dahdi-linux-complete-3.1.0-rc1+3.1.0-rc1.tar.gz.
>
> Try that.
>
I noticed that was there, but I didn't try it originally because it's
obviously a beta version. However, I did download it and try it. It does
compile,
Seems like I post about this about once a year, when it's time to upgrade
Fedora.
I first got this error trying to compile a patched version of
dahdi-linux-2.11.1; I noticed that there is now a
dahdi-linux-complete-3.0.0+3.0.0, so I tried that one with the same result.
If I compile it while runni
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Ira wrote:
> Hello Asterisk,
>
> I thought I'd try Fedora 26 as they have 32 bit and
> support. Got it installed, then downloaded Asterisk 14.6.0 but
> can't seem to get it built.
>
I run an asterisk server on Fedora 26. It's easy to install asterisk from
package
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Marcelo Terres wrote:
>
> Did you try to add a manual Iptables rule?
>
> iptables -I INPUT -j ACCEPT.
>
CentOS 7 uses firewalld rather than iptables, unless you explicitly disable
firewalld and enable iptables. The default configuration is fairly
restricted.
--Gr
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Anthony Joseph Messina <
amess...@messinet.com> wrote:
>
>
> It looks like you're using F24, so you might be able to rebuild using the
> SRPMs https://messinet.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/26/SRPMS/
Thanks very much for that. I've downloaded it, and when I get so
Does anyone know if there are any plans to update the dahdi-linux kernel
module code? It no longer compiles with recent kernels, and the last
release of dahdi-linux appears to have been around March of 2016. I am
currently running 4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64 (on a Fedora system obviously) and
the dahdi-l
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 8:15 AM, christopher kamutumwa <
chriskamutu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Package kernel-devel-3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 already installed and
> latest version but i still receive the same error
>
How about kernel-headers? That's a separate package on my Fedora system,
not sure
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 7:47 AM, christopher kamutumwa <
chriskamutu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You do not appear to have the sources for the 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 kernel
> installed.
You need to install the kernel-devel package to compile kernel modules.
--Greg
--
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Dovid Bender wrote:
> Changing your port should fix all your worries.
>
That may work if you control both ends of the SIP connection.
--Greg
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Apparently Verizon is blocking or changing packets on port 5060 so my
> softphone from my hotspot will not work.
>
Sounds like you are another victim of SIP ALG. I ended up having to change
to a VOIP provider that would allow me to use IAX ins
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> What is needed to get DAHDI to start up correctly on CentOS 7 and
> systemd...
>
On my Fedora 24 system, the "dahdi-tools" package contains an old-style
init script /etc/rc.d/init.d/dahdi, and this seems to work just fine with
systemd. I real
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Tzafrir Cohen
wrote:
> asterisk -rx "dialplan show $context"
There is no existence of 'from-internal' context
OK, so now I know what to work on; thank you very much for that.
I can see that, in fact, the dahdi-channels.conf file sets the context as
"from-inter
My DAHDI phones were broken since a recent power outage (which required a
reboot). For some reason the Asterisk or DAHDI configuration is messed up
somewhere (probably from an update that was applied before the reboot?).
I am using a Digium TDM410 card.
At first, nothing worked at all, but I disc
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:36 AM, A J Stiles
wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 Mar 2016, Vitor Mazuco wrote:
>
> > Is possible to use X100p TDM400P, Tdm410p, Tdm400, A400p, Ax400p or
> > any others digium card FXO for use Fax modem?
>
> Yes, in theory it is entirely possible to use an FXO card driven by
>
On my Fedora system (which is similar to but not exactly the same as CentOS
7, YMMV), there is an /etc/rc.d/init.d/dahdi script. This causes systemd to
generate a "dahdi" service. But there is no "dahdi.service" file. If you
do not have the init script file, you probably need to install the
dahdi-
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> the first numeric button press generates a fast busy. Inbound calls to the
> Dahdi phones work just fine.
>
I did some poking around and figured out that I could run something like
"asterisk -r -d -d -d" and get more deta
I upgraded my system from Fedora 20 to 23, and in the process from asterisk
11.3 to 13.1 . After some fiddling (recompiling Dahdi, installing extra
packages such as asterisk-dahdi and asterisk-sip), everything mostly works,
except the buttons on the Dahdi phones. Calls can be initiated from the SIP
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Matt Riddell wrote:
> Did you buy the number from your carrier? Maybe it’s set on their side
> for the trunk.
>
That's what I think too, but they are denying this. I think what's
happening is they have a customer service guy interpreting logs (probably
incorrect
Thanks very much for all the responses. I now have a few more things to try.
I should have noted that I am using IAX2 rather than SIP to connect to my
provider. I do have some internal phones that use SIP to connect to my
asterisk box, as well as some corded phones connected through a Digium
DAHD
I have found several places where it is explained how to do this, and I
have got the following setup, but it is not working (the provider claims
they are not getting a proper caller ID setting from me).
I have a number of extensions that are shorthand, that I will use one of as
an example (real nu
Hopefully this is really a generic question about IAX and doesn't turn out
to be something specific to Teliax, because they haven't been too helpful
so far. All they can tell me is that my login shows "status unknown" on
their end, which prevents me from receiving inbound calls on my Teliax
number.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:58 AM, akhilesh chand
wrote:
> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> target prot opt source destination
> ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0state
> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> ACCEPT icmp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0
> ACCEPT
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 16:17 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 11:12 -0500, Richard Mudgett wrote:
>
> >
> > One thing you must remember about the [channels] section in
> > chan_dahdi.conf
> > is that *all* configuration in the section is
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 11:12 -0500, Richard Mudgett wrote:
>
> One thing you must remember about the [channels] section in
> chan_dahdi.conf
> is that *all* configuration in the section is cumulative. For
> example:
>
> [channels]
>
> echocancel = yes
>
> faxdetect=incoming
>
> signaling=fx
I've got a Digium Wildcard TDM410P with one POTS line and three
extensions. One of the extensions is connected to a fax modem. This kind
of works, but there's a gotcha. If I set faxdetect=incoming in
chan_dahdi.conf, then incoming faxes do get routed to the modem and this
all works, but outbound fa
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 18:29 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> When I play:
> exten => s,n,Background(welcome)
> and press extension "1" the system will not jump to this extension
> immediately, there is a few sec. pause.
Mine looks like this:
exten => s,1,Answer()
exten => s,2,Set(TIMEOUT(digit)=1)
exten =
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 18:14 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> Greg, would you mind posting your dialplan?
It may be a day or two before I can do that, as of course I will need to
sanitize it (remove passwords, commented lines, etc.)
--Greg
--
__
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 13:55 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> Good idea, I like your approach with press "number" to leave a message", this
> will definitely cut the robo-calls voice-mail.
I do this, but without any white or black lists, and it works great. The
greeting says "press one for , or two for ".
System details:
Digium Wildcard TDM410P with three extensions and one POTS line.
Dual core Pentium 4 (32-bit) processor
Fedora 18
Asterisk 11.2.1
DAHDI Version: 2.6.2 Echo Canceller: HWEC
I recently upgraded from Asterisk 1.4, and made as few changes to the
configuration files as possible. I reg
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:26 -0500, Russ Meyerriecks wrote:
> There were a few compatability issues with the tdm400's pci interface chip
> and certain motherboards
Interesting idea, but it's been running in this same server with the
same motherboard for at least two years now, and this problem star
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:26 -0500, Russ Meyerriecks wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:42:16AM -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> > I have a Digium TDM400P card that appears to have died. The first noted
> > symptoms were that dahdi would fail to reload on boot. On closer
> > inspe
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:26 -0500, Russ Meyerriecks wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:42:16AM -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> > I have a Digium TDM400P card that appears to have died. The first noted
> > symptoms were that dahdi would fail to reload on boot. On closer
> > inspe
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 12:46 -0400, Andrew Latham wrote:
>
> Sounds like you did a kernel update and did not rebuild DAHDI.
I haven't done a kernel update on this particular machine in quite some
time, since long before the card started failing. It is still running
Fedora 14, so there aren't even
I have a Digium TDM400P card that appears to have died. The first noted
symptoms were that dahdi would fail to reload on boot. On closer
inspection, the card looks totally dead; no lights on at all. I have
tried moving it to a different PCI slot, and removing the other PCI card
(a 3com 10/100 NIC)
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 09:56 -0500, C F wrote:
> This is the closest thing I was able to find in my wctdm.c file:
> if ((blah & 0xf) == 2) {
> /* ProSLIC 3215, not a 3210 */
> wc->flags[card] |= FLAG_3215;
> }
> If I take out the 2 first lines I get er
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 17:36 -0400, Paul Belanger wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Frank Tarczynski
> wrote:
> > Any pointers to share?
> >
> chan_dahdi.conf
> faxdetect=incoming
>
> extensions.conf
> exten => fax,1,Dial(DAHDI/4)
This is what I do and it works great, as long as what is
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 15:29 +0200, hbk wrote:
>
> My wish are a program that maintain a mirror copy of the HD.
http://www.drbd.org/
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 15:35 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> Is there a reasonably easy way to increase the volume on a DAHDI
> channel?
Thanks to everyone for the pointer to rxgain/txgain in chan_dahdi.conf .
That seems to have done the trick.
Is there a reasonably easy way to increase the volume on a DAHDI
channel? The VOIP phones in the house work OK, but for the phones
connected to DAHDI channels on a Digium TDM400P card, the volume is very
low and it's hard to hear if there is any background noise at all. If
this is documented, point
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 19:09 -0400, Leif Madsen wrote:
> Greg Woods wrote:
> > I am still running 1.4 because of this bug:
> >
> > https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15129
> >
> > I haven't tried any 1.6 versions recently; looks like some patches have
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 17:41 +0200, Olivier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm evaluating what could keep me from upgrading production systems to
> 1.6.2.
I am still running 1.4 because of this bug:
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15129
I haven't tried any 1.6 versions recently; looks like some patche
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 20:25 +0100, F6HQZ wrote:
> cat /proc/interrupts
> Search the Digium cards drivers and look if several interfaces are using the
> same IRQ number.
> If yes, you risk issues and data losses
What can I do if there is a sharing going on? Looks like my TDM card is
sharing it's
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 11:53 -0700, Greg Woods wrote:
> > the machine will lock up because the TDM board or the Dahdi
> > driver goes south. /var/log/messages starts filling up with repeated
> > messages:
> >
> > kernel: TDM PCI Master abort
>
> it's
> the machine will lock up because the TDM board or the Dahdi
> driver goes south. /var/log/messages starts filling up with repeated
> messages:
>
> kernel: TDM PCI Master abort
Thank you to everyone who has taken the time to reply.
First I am going to apply the "fix what you know is broken" pr
I am having to abandon asterisk after having used it for 2.5 years due
to this problem. Every couple of days (sometimes more often, sometimes
less), the machine will lock up because the TDM board or the Dahdi
driver goes south. /var/log/messages starts filling up with repeated
messages:
kernel: TD
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 05:34 -0600, mos...@infolog.mr wrote:
> I am now working on a project which need data modem calls passing trough
> asterisk with a TDM card. But i found out (as Mr Greg woods) that it was
> impossible.
Just to be clear about this: don't use me as an authorita
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 01:58 +0100, Tim Korte wrote:
>
> When I try to establish an analog modem connection with this setup, the modem
> is unable to connect to the remote party - when connecting the
> modem directly to the PSTN line, everyting is fine.
I hope you have better luck, but when I as
I'm assuming this is an issue with DAHDI. I am running asterisk 1.4.26
on Fedora 11 with dahdi-linux kernel modules 2.2.0.2-65 (both from
ATrpms). I have a "Wildcard TDM400P REV I (4 modules)" with one POTS
line and three local extensions (never can remember which is FXS and
which is FXO )-: and a
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 07:20 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> incoming calls
> through the FXO line are dropped as soon as there is a button press.
> The error logged is:
>
> [Aug 23 18:15:39] WARNING[6532] chan_dahdi.c: Cannot handle frames in 2
> format
> [Aug 23 18:15:39] WARNING
I posted about this before without ever finding a solution, so I'm
trying again. I am upgrading from Fedora 8, asterisk-1.4.21, and zaptel
1.4.11 to Fedora 11, asterisk-1.6.1 and dahdi-2.1 . I have a couple of
VOIP phones via SIP and one Wildcard TDM400P REV I with 3 FXS and one
FXO port. I am usi
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:47 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> extensions.conf is fully supported in Asterisk 1.6.x; there have been
> some syntax changes (which are covered in the UPGRADE files)
I was able to overcome a few more hurdles and make this work. Little
annoyances such as (after some G
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 14:27 -0700, Steve Edwards wrote:
> > When the developers want to convert the config language, sooner or later
> > they will stop supporting the old stuff and it won't be possible to get
> > the newest supported features without converting.
> I don't see that happening in
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 11:49 -0700, Steve Edwards wrote:
> But, when the pain of using packages exceeds the hassle of the source,
> I'll use the source without hesitation.
Agreed. I use trunk for MythTV, for instance, because there are features
not in the latest packaged version that I really do
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 09:56 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> This has got to be an FAQ, so if someone can point me to where it is
> answered, I would be greatly appreciated. The documentation for all this
> stuff is scattered and (to me at least) either very sketchy or hard to
> find.
>
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 12:25 -0400, Singer X.J. Wang wrote:
> Can I make a non related suggestions?
>
> Ditch Fedora and use CentOS.
Might be a possibility except that this is a catch-all home server. It
is used for things other than asterisk, so there are other reasons why I
need a more up-to-dat
This has got to be an FAQ, so if someone can point me to where it is
answered, I would be greatly appreciated. The documentation for all this
stuff is scattered and (to me at least) either very sketchy or hard to
find.
What I want is a guide for how to convert from 1.4 with zaptel to 1.6
with dahd
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 12:44 -0700, Ira wrote:
> Did you run genzapelconf or whatever it was that built the files
> correctly so that zaptel and Asterisk recognized them correctly?
It has been so long since I had to mess with my installation (a
testament to asterisk's excellent stability) that I
I just had to move all my disk drives and PCI cards, including the
Digium TDM400P, into a new box when the motherboard died. Now that the
new box is up and running, my FXS ports no longer work although the FXO
port does. I am hoping someone can help me diagnose and debug. I am
running Fedora 8, ast
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:46 -0700, Anthony Francis wrote:
> Gotta love this list being farmed for spammers now. I am sure they call
> it targeted delivery or some such nonsense. I can't wait for capitalism
> to completely fail, then there won't be any spam.
Socialism has already completely faile
Darren Sessions wrote:
> Not sure what you've heard before, but I have successfully used a
> modem at 9600 baud
Well, OK, "it won't work" was a little strong. Faxes work because they
too are at slow speed. But for me at least, 9600 baud is pretty much
useless. Instead, I just patch the modem d
I have been told before on this list that a modem through a zaptel card
will not work. And mine doesn't, at least not for data calls (it works
fine for fax). Apparently the modem requires the full bandwidth of the
POTS line, which you do not get through the zaptel card.
You might at least check to
Shaun Ruffell wrote:
>
> If you have subversion installed on your server, could you try using
> this version of zaptel:
>
> http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/branches/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Thank you to everyone who offered assistance. For now, upgrading the
driver has fixed the problem: outbound
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 15:23 -0500, Brent Davidson wrote:
> the cords that ran between the wall jack and the jacks on the X100P
> cords all ran between the server's 21" CRT monitor and the wall.
Not a problem here, as the monitor is on the other side of the room from
the server and the wire from
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 21:18 +0200, Ronny Forberger wrote:
> I want to use a analog V.92 modem to make outgoing (and possibly)
> incoming phone call through a standard analog phone line.
When I asked this question, I was basically told that it isn't possible.
The problem is along the lines that
Shaun Ruffell wrote:
>
> >> svn co http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/branches/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> zaptel-1.4-4122
>
Thank you, I will try that tonight when I get home and report back.
--Greg
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http:/
> If you have subversion installed on your server, could you try using
> this version of zaptel:
>
> http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/branches/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not Found
The requested URL /svn/zaptel/branches/[EMAIL PROTECTED] was not found on this
server.
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 07:28 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> [Apr 2 07:13:48] WARNING[24249] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel
> 4: No Alarm
> [Apr 2 07:13:48] NOTICE[24242] chan_zap.c: Alarm cleared on channel 4
>
> "core set debug 3" doesn't give any more deta
I've been a happy user of asterisk for over a year just for a small home
setup (a Digium TDM400P with one POTS line and three internal extensions
plus a couple of SIP phones). I recently moved from running Fedora Core
6 running * 1.4.1 compiled from source and zaptel 1.4.7 to Fedora 8,
using the RP
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:05 -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Greg Woods wrote:
>
> > The problem is that PPP dialout does not work
From:
Kevin P. Fleming
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> it is not likely that you will be able to accomplish what you
&
I previously posted about this problem and received suggestions
involving turning off echo cancellation. As far as I can tell, echo
cancellation is already disabled on this channel, so I'm back.
What I've got is a small home setup with a single four-port Digium card:
Module 0: Installed -- AUTO F
This is just a low priority curiosity question because I have a usable
workaround.
I have Digium card that uses the Zaptel driver (can't get to my home
machine right now to get the exact model, but it probably doesn't
matter). It's a card with one POTS line and three extension hookups. I'm
using
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 09:55 +0200, Michiel van Baak wrote:
> On 17:54, Mon 08 Oct 07, D4rk F1ber wrote:
> I am just curious about what
> > others feel are useful uses for it within the home, and what others
> > get excited about regarding it all.
>
> What did the trick for me is integrating it wit
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 12:49 +0200, Thomas Artner wrote:
> My solution is that I let asterisk pick up every call, and if it is a
> fax, then the call is forwarded to a fax-machine.
> If its a voice call, the call is forwarded to the phones.
That is what I do as well. Use the "fax" extension to for
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 10:06 -0400, Noah Miller wrote:
> I don't know what your primary
> incoming line does, but if it goes to a queue or a message, you could
> also have a special DTMF key to break out and go to VoicemailMain or
> whatever.
That's what I did and it works fine since asterisk all
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 21:31 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> A stupid question: how do you see that there is no chan_zap.so ?
Another stupid question: did you rerun "make distclean" and "configure"
in the asterisk source directory after installing the zaptel driver?
--Greg
__
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 14:58 +, Iban Lopetegi Zinkunegi wrote:
> I go to my asterisk recompile it but I realize there is no
> chan_zap.so! When I recompile it, i check the make menuselect and the
> channel zapata is not appearing there. Does any body know any patch for
> that? Or how to
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 23:25 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> My guess: timing.
>
> Remove all the calls to ztcfg from modprobe.conf, use a proper init.d
> script, and you won't need to modprobe anything except wctdm .
On my system at least, there is nothing in modprobe.conf at all
regarding zaptel
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 13:47 +1200, Aaron Martin wrote:
> If I manually run the following commands:
>
> modprobe zaptel
> modprobe wctdm
> ztcfg -vvv
> asterisk -vvvc
>
> Then SOMETIMES asterisk will work perfectly with the zap channels, allowing
> both
> incoming and outgoing calls as per my di
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 14:53 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> when I recompiled zaptel with 1.4.1 and
> installed that, the problem is gone. I don't know if this was due to
> changes I made in the 1.4.0 zconfig.h file, or that there were fixes in
> 1.4.1.
I checked, and the zconfig.h f
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 14:26 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Did you make _any_ changes to zconfig.h when you built Zaptel, or did
> you make any changes to the Makefile or specify any special compilation
> arguments?
Another good thought. To be honest, I do remember poking around in
zconfig.h bu
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 19:07 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> The thing I specifically wondered about is that zaptel on its own causes
> problems (without modules that actually generate spans: ztdummy, wctdm,
> wcfxo, etc.)
You are correct: I can load zaptel by itself and I do not see the
problem.
Thanks to everyone so far for the suggestions; I have a few things to
try.
Some things I want to note:
1) Yes, I am certain that when I load and unload the modules, they are
really loaded or unloaded. I did check with lsmod. I am also certain
that the problems I am having are 100% correlated wit
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 14:17 -0500, Lacy Moore - Aspendora wrote:
>
> This was mentioned earlier:
>
> >I suspect IRQ Sharing.
I know. And I posted my /proc/interrupts showing that there were no
shared IRQ's.
>
> And from the rest, it sounds like your network card and Digium card
> are both s
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 11:36 -0800, Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC wrote:
> in some
> places, there are so few phone prefixes, you can simply match them
> exactly.
Thanks for that idea; that should be even easier to do here, because we
live in 10-digit land and have two overlapping area codes, w
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 22:42 +0530, Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
> Which version of Zaptel and Asterisk are you using.
>
> If you have compiled Asterisk 1.4.2 with Zaptel 1.4.0 or a lesser version of
> Zaptel, you may face this problem.
It happened to me with asterisk 1.4.1 and Zaptel 1.4.0
--Greg
___
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 07:46 +0200, Jose Limeres wrote:
> when I try to make a call through the ZAP
> channel get an error message about NO ZAP CHANNEL AVAILABLE. Ztcfg and
> zttool show the card correctly installed.
> When I tried to use the debug command ZAP SHOW, it was not present in
> the CLI.
I hope I don't get flamed the first time I post to a new list. I have
spent a couple of hours poking around without seeing anything like this.
The problem is, as soon as I load the Zaptel drivers (with a TDM-31B
card), ssh into or out of the server is broken. Trying to ssh in, I get:
RSA_public_d
91 matches
Mail list logo
