[asterisk-users] 1.4.22 CALLERID(num)

2008-11-12 Thread James Fromm
We have a weird thing happening with the caller id when a call is dialed to a SIP device registered to 1.4.22. We're preparing 1.4.22 on a development machine for switch to live. The callerid number displayed on the SIP device (Polycom or soft phone) is a full SIP URL, i.e. sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[asterisk-users] SIP interface status

2007-09-27 Thread James Fromm
I've discovered that the status of a SIP device doesn't get passed as in-use when on an outbound call. Viewing the debug log the status is always passed as 'not in use' when on the outbound call. The sip_devicestate function doesn't appear to check the user object at all. The devices are conf

[asterisk-users] Polycom headset button blinking

2007-05-10 Thread James Fromm
Does anyone know what it means when the headset button on Polycom phones is blinking? The blinking state is achieved by hitting the button twice while on-hook. First press activates the headset circuit and takes the phone off-hook. Second press deactivates the headset circuit, puts the phone

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP interface status and calllimit

2007-02-22 Thread James Fromm
Nevermind, I found it. I'll put up an SVN version in my dev environment today. Thanks. James Fromm wrote: I've reviewed the bugs reports. I didn't see anything that applied to this. Have you? Could you point it out to me? Olle E Johansson wrote: 21 feb 2007 kl. 15.50 sk

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP interface status and calllimit

2007-02-22 Thread James Fromm
I've reviewed the bugs reports. I didn't see anything that applied to this. Have you? Could you point it out to me? Olle E Johansson wrote: 21 feb 2007 kl. 15.50 skrev James Fromm: Anybody seen this behavior? To determine if it's my config or a bug, could I trouble s

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP interface status and calllimit

2007-02-21 Thread James Fromm
x27;t. The incorrect count can be cleared up by ringing the interface for how ever many calls are incorrect. Beware, removing call-limit will require a restart to take effect. Thanks in advance for any help. James Fromm wrote: It does. Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: Maybe Queue doesn

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP interface status and calllimit

2007-02-20 Thread James Fromm
It does. Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: Maybe Queue doesn't consider a SIP account that returns "BUSY" as "in use". That would be the only case where I could see needing call-limit. James Fromm wrote: We do the same thing only we use ringinuse=no and

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP interface status and calllimit

2007-02-20 Thread James Fromm
We do the same thing only we use ringinuse=no and autopause=yes for the queue. With autopause, if the agent is busy their interface in the queue gets paused. Setting call-limit for the SIP interface is the only way to make ringinuse=no work. Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: J

[asterisk-users] SIP interface status and calllimit

2007-02-19 Thread James Fromm
ringinuse option in queues.conf will work properly. Has anyone else seen this issue? Any ideas? Thanks, James Fromm ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http

Re: [asterisk-users] End Wrap-up Time?

2007-02-16 Thread James Fromm
t port and changes the manager interface to not log every command received to the debug log unless the debug option is set. The diff can be found at http://www.omnis.com/queueendwait.diff. Matt wrote: Where is this patch? On 2/16/07, *James Fromm* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PR

Re: [asterisk-users] End Wrap-up Time?

2007-02-16 Thread James Fromm
I patched 1.4.0 to add a command to the manager api in the queue application to implement the end wrap-up time I was asking about. All the command does is modify the 'lastcall' timestamp for the queue member by subtracting the value of the queue's defined wrapup time. Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:

[asterisk-users] End Wrap-up Time?

2007-02-13 Thread James Fromm
Does anyone have a solution to allow an agent to selectively end his wrap-up time? We define a wrap-up time of 60 seconds to allow our agents to finish their notes from a call. In some cases, the full 60 seconds is not needed and our agents would like to end their wrap-up time. Thanks, Jay __

[asterisk-users] End Wrap-up Time?

2007-02-12 Thread James Fromm
Does anyone have a solution to allow an agent to selectively end his wrap-up time? We define a wrap-up time of 60 seconds to allow our agents to finish their notes from a call. In some cases, the full 60 seconds is not needed and our agents would like to end their wrap-up time. Thanks, Jay

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Help - Poor Voice Quality

2007-02-07 Thread James Fromm
Jim, I too am a Teliax user. Talk to their technical support. IAX2 is NOT preferred. They'll tell you to use SIP. Jim Duda wrote: Thanks for the reply Lacy. Yes, I know that I am using IAX2 and not SIP for my connection to teliax. IAX2 is the preferred protocol for connection to teliax.

Re: [asterisk-users] How to access environment variable?

2007-02-07 Thread James Fromm
'export MYIP' in the startup script for Asterisk. Larry Alkoff wrote: I was only trying to demonstrate that my special variable MYIP was indeed in the environment of the shell. I suspect it's not in the Asterisk process environment - why I dunno. I'll look at that tomorrow but suspect I'll n

Re: [asterisk-users] How to access environment variable?

2007-02-06 Thread James Fromm
How do you start Asterisk? You need to make sure the environment variable you want inside Asterisk is being exported. I use 'export HOSTNAME' in my asterisk init script and it works like a charm. Larry Alkoff wrote: Thanks for your reply Ioan. Very interesting. ${ENV(PATH)} works to displa

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 & Polycom buddy status

2007-01-26 Thread James Fromm
Olle E Johansson wrote: 26 jan 2007 kl. 16.31 skrev James Fromm: Olle E Johansson wrote: 24 jan 2007 kl. 18.10 skrev Eric "ManxPower" Wieling: James Fromm wrote: The behavior we see is that the SIP interface in the queue will sometimes not release from the in-use state. Con

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 & Polycom buddy status

2007-01-26 Thread James Fromm
Olle E Johansson wrote: 24 jan 2007 kl. 18.10 skrev Eric "ManxPower" Wieling: James Fromm wrote: The behavior we see is that the SIP interface in the queue will sometimes not release from the in-use state. Connecting to the interface from another SIP device and immediately hangi

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 & Polycom buddy status

2007-01-24 Thread James Fromm
ection in the SIP channel driver appears suspect to me. Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: James Fromm wrote: The behavior we see is that the SIP interface in the queue will sometimes not release from the in-use state. Connecting to the interface from another SIP device and immediately ha

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 & Polycom buddy status

2007-01-24 Thread James Fromm
Our 650s are running 2.0.3b. The problem still exists for us. We see the devices as members of our customer service queue stick on 'in-use' in the Queue application while the device has no active SIP channel and will accept calls. Removing 'call-limit' from the sip.conf in Asterisk for the d

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 & Polycom buddy status

2007-01-24 Thread James Fromm
We also use Polycom IP650 phones. They are assigned to our customer service department. Each SIP interface is a member of our customer service Queue in Asterisk. The behavior we see is that the SIP interface in the queue will sometimes not release from the in-use state. Connecting to the i

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out

2007-01-23 Thread James Fromm
__ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of James Fromm Sent: Fri 1/19/2007 6:07 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out That worked. I don't understand what call-limit has to do with this. I set it to 5. Why doe

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out

2007-01-22 Thread James Fromm
____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of James Fromm Sent: Fri 1/19/2007 6:07 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out That worked. I don't understand what call-limit has to do with this. I set it to 5.

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out

2007-01-19 Thread James Fromm
wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Fromm Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 12:22 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out Does anyone have ringinuse=no and auto

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out

2007-01-19 Thread James Fromm
ints for member interfaces to determine their status? Thanks, James James Fromm wrote: No, call-limit is not being used. Do you have ringinuse=no working? Has anyone seen it work? Each SIP device has a very minimal config in sip.conf. Here's a show sip peer: * Name

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out

2007-01-18 Thread James Fromm
: OK (14 ms) Useragent: PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_650-UA/2.0.3.0131 Reg. Contact : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Watkins, Bradley wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Fromm Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:29 AM To: Asteri

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out

2007-01-18 Thread James Fromm
s on hold servicelevel = 60 ;calls must be answered within 60 seconds announce-holdtime = no autopause = yes ringinuse = no joinempty = yes leavewhenempty = no Am I missing something obvious? Thanks, James James Fromm wrote: DoH! I missed th

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out

2007-01-17 Thread James Fromm
= 0 ;unlimited callers on hold servicelevel = 60 ;calls must be answered within 60 seconds announce-holdtime = no autopause = yes ringinuse = no joinempty = yes leavewhenempty = no I'm I missing something obvious? Thanks, James James Fromm wrote: DoH! I miss

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out

2007-01-17 Thread James Fromm
DoH! I missed that ringinuse. Thanks! Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote: James Fromm wrote: Hmm, the use of autopause in queues.conf introduces a new issue. When a queue member is on a call, the queue continues to try to send calls to the member's interface. Getting the 'Busy Here'

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out

2007-01-17 Thread James Fromm
that autopause appears to pause the member interface even when they're on another call. Am I missing something or is this the expected behavior? I didn't expect the Queue application to try member interfaces that are busy. Thanks, James James Fromm wrote: NICE! That did th

[asterisk-users] Queue cmd option 'i'

2007-01-15 Thread James Fromm
Using Asterisk 1.4, on the console 'show application queue' mentions an option 'i' that should "ignore call forward requests from queue members and do nothing when they are requested." Does this work? My assumption is that the member whose next according to the queue strategy should get the call

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out

2007-01-15 Thread James Fromm
NICE! That did the trick. Thanks! Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote: try autopause in queues.conf James Fromm wrote: We are assigning interfaces directly to our customer service queue through an application running on each agent's PC using the QueueAdd Manager API command. No agents are de

[asterisk-users] Queue and Interface time out

2007-01-15 Thread James Fromm
We are assigning interfaces directly to our customer service queue through an application running on each agent's PC using the QueueAdd Manager API command. No agents are defined in agents.conf. Does anyone have a solution to pause or remove an interface that doesn't answer after a defined pe

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue Monitor not mixing if using UNIQUEID in MONITOR_FILENAME

2006-12-19 Thread James Fromm
I spent hours debugging this a few weeks ago. The ${UNIQUEID} contains a period ("."). Mine are something like .xx. When soxmix is executed to mix the in and out files, the file types are not specified. This causes soxmix to attempt to determine the file type by the filename's exten

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom_acd_functions SIP trouble

2006-07-25 Thread James Fromm
dosent work then, then its your configs. Also did you remember to reload asterisk ? - Original Message - From: "James Fromm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 2:24 PM Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom_acd_functions SIP trouble I'm trying to use t

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom_acd_functions SIP trouble

2006-07-25 Thread James Fromm
prob. know this but in your configs it shows secret commented out. Also it with a softphone if it dosent work then, then its your configs. Also did you remember to reload asterisk ? - Original Message - From: "James Fromm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006

[asterisk-users] Polycom_acd_functions SIP trouble

2006-07-24 Thread James Fromm
I'm trying to use the latest revision of Bweschke's branch from SVN for polycom_acd_functions. Asterisk builds and runs without error but all SIP devices can't register when specifying a secret in sip.conf. The Polycom 601 I'm testing with and a copy of SJphone will not register. IAX from Ide