RE: [Asterisk-Users] * and Innovaphone

2004-07-06 Thread Martin Bene
Hi Torsten, > I think I have the same problem as Martin Bene mentioned in > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-January/ > 034521.html > Since I found no further information about this I'd like to > ask wether you know what the reason for this problem is an

AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Junghans Quad-BRI card and asterisk cvs-head

2004-07-06 Thread Martin Bene
> If you can't wait you can use the patch from someone who merged the > bristuff patch with a more recent version of cvs head... > > This one: > http://capi4linux.thepenguin.de/download/asterisk/bri-stuff-0. > 0.2a-pp.tar.gz Thanks for that pointer, I'll give it a try. Bye, martin

AW: [Asterisk-Users] H323 Call Transfers

2004-07-06 Thread Martin Bene
> How about running a current (cvs -head) version of Asterisk? Would love to and of course tried to: no go because of Junghans Quad-BRI ISDN Card, no driver for cvs -head. Bye, Martin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digiu

AW: [Asterisk-Users] Junghans Quad-BRI card and asterisk cvs-head

2004-07-06 Thread Martin Bene
> The bristuff distribution comes with a install.sh script > (./install.sh) > which downloads, compiles the required software on your system. > > If you want to do it manually, look into download.sh to see the exact > cvs checkout options which downloads the required asterisk and libpri > vers

[Asterisk-Users] H323 Call Transfers

2004-07-06 Thread Martin Bene
We're using a couple of h323 IP Phones (innovaphone ip200) w/ asterisk. Basic call setup works, but we can't get call transfers to work: On pressing the "transfer" button on the phone (getting a new dialtone) the 2nd endpoint is disconnected. Any idea if we can get this to work? Same reaction

[Asterisk-Users] Junghans Quad-BRI card and asterisk cvs-head

2004-07-06 Thread Martin Bene
We're using the Quad-BRI card from Junghanns.NET with corresponding drivers (bristuff 0.0.2). The driver tries to patch asterisk libpri, which fails for current version. Anyone got an idea what'S the latest version of asterisk / libtri usable with the Quad-BRI Card? Thanks, Martin _

AW: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phones that support G.723 on H.323

2004-04-13 Thread Martin Bene
> > Does anyone know of Phone that supports G.723 on H.323. > Innovaphone tiptel 200 for example. http://www.innovaphone.com/webneu2/products/en_IP200.asp One of the nicest phones I've seen so far, h.323 only though. Bye, Martin ___ Asterisk-Users

AW: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 SIP Images

2004-03-28 Thread Martin Bene
> I had a completely different experience. The day I decided I > wanted to get a contract, I called Cisco, gave them my personal > credit card, and three hours later had my CCO access upgraded. > I just bought a smartnet for one phone for two years > (a whopping $16), there was nothing to it.

AW: [Asterisk-Users] I got it (was: Cisco 7940 with asterisk)

2004-01-23 Thread Martin Bene
.cnf.xml) or DISTINCTIVERINGLIST.XML on my tftp server. The real problem is keepalive timing: * the 7940 doesn't like the 5 second default timeout - set timeout to >=10 seconds and you avoid the restart loop. Bye, Martin M

[Asterisk-Users] RE: h323 with innovaphone ip 400 gatekeeper/innovaphone Ip200 phones

2004-01-21 Thread Martin Bene
I know - talking to myself is a bad sign, but still: >While asterisk can receive audio from the h323 phone quite >fine, reverse doesn't work. Added information: when turning up h.323 tracing, I get this: channels.cxx(777) LogChan Bandwidth requested/used = 64.0/0.0 kb/s h323.cxx(4419)H323

[Asterisk-Users] h323 with innovaphone ip 400 gatekeeper/innovaphone Ip200 phones

2004-01-21 Thread Martin Bene
Hi, I'm trying to get h323 communication working between asterisk (0.7.1) and Innovaphone Gatekeeper + innovaphone phones. chan_323 installed OK with currently recommended pwlib_1.5.2 and openh323_1.12.2. Registration asterisk with the gatekeeper works OK, externsion for my test(sip) phone gets

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Again: 7920 Cisco IP Phone Skinny & SIP

2004-01-17 Thread Martin Bene
Hi Jan, >in the sccp_registration i would then handle the registration for the >7920 how the callmanager is behaving. I've just gotten one step further with my 7920: Got it successfully registered to asterisk. Still doesn't actually work, but definitely a step in the right direction. The proble

AW: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Again: 7920 Cisco IP Phone Skinny & SIP

2004-01-15 Thread Martin Bene
Hi, >[...] >> > There should also be a digitally signed version of that file >> > (cmterm_7920.*.sbn), which the phone probably requires. >> >> nope. no sbn. according to my cisco source the file is not signed. > >Funny, that would be the first phone with unsigned firmware. >But I'll double-check

[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Asterisk-Dev] More Success on the Cisco 7920 and SCCP !!!!!

2004-01-11 Thread Martin Bene
Hi Siggi, > > 7960 and then "Call Ended" on the Display (curious about that !!!). > > That seems to be normal for the 7920. I've sniffed the registration > procedure with Cisco's newest 3.3(3) CallManager (+patches), and it's > doing the same thing. Maybe that's some odd way of testing if the > C

AW: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with Cisco 7920/Skinny/Asterisk

2004-01-09 Thread Martin Bene
Hi Jan, >the last 2 days i was working on getting the 7920 Phones to work with >Skinny & Asterisk; however no luck (yet). Same here, no joy so far. >Does anybody has a SEPDefault.CNF.xml and a SEP.CNF.xml handy for >me ? it should be documented at the cisco page, but it isn't :-( The default fi

[Asterisk-Users] asterisk sccp support

2004-01-05 Thread Martin Bene
Hi zozo, sorry to bother you; I've been trying to get a cisco 7920 phone (that's the cute wifi/wireless modell) to work with asterisk (no success so far) and ran across your chan_sccp module; is there a current cvs version that I could base my tests on? tar version 0.1 seems to be ~2003-09-12, cv

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware to build an Enterprise AsteriskUniversal Gateway

2004-01-05 Thread Martin Bene
Hi Richard, >Load balancers have some added value, but those that have had to deal >with a problem where a single system within the cluster is up but not >processing data would probably argue their actual value. I've done quite a lot of work with clustered/ha linux configurations. I usualy try to