Re: [asterisk-users] AGI PHP script

2009-04-23 Thread Mik Cheez
This is the right suggestion: Run something like the following: [h...@mouth tmp]# echo this is a test | newhire.php If the script runs, check your maillog (/var/log/maillog) to see if there's any evidence of what may have happened. Geraint Lee wrote: Check you can run the script from th

[asterisk-users] Retrieve DTMF during Dial

2009-03-02 Thread Mik Cheez
I would like to do the following: Dial an extension in Asterisk The extension runs an application which dials a number (like a hybrid of DIAL and READ). The dialed number is a box which does nothing but play DTMF tones then hangs up The first box captures the DTMF tones to a variable Dial

Re: [asterisk-users] call file concurrency

2009-02-27 Thread Mik Cheez
Steve Edwards wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, James Sneeringer wrote: If you can get the outgoing directory (or a reaonable parent) on its own mountable partition or volume, you could accomplish this with disk quotas. It won't control how many Asterisk processes at once (does it even handle

Re: [asterisk-users] DID's in a specific rate center

2009-02-25 Thread Mik Cheez
There are sites which will show you the ratecenter and the company. Try the following to see all NPANXX's in that ratecenter: http://www.telcodata.us/telcodata/ratecenter?ratecenter=SCRM%20MAINstate=CA To find the ratecenter: http://www.telcodata.us/telcodata/telco?npa=916exchange=854 Try 01

Re: [asterisk-users] US DID

2009-02-19 Thread Mik Cheez
Broadvox Nhadie wrote: Hi, Anyone knows a DID provider that can do both outbound and inbound? Regards Nhadie ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update

Re: [asterisk-users] What do you use? .conf or AEL?

2009-02-10 Thread Mik Cheez
I use them both; my legacy dialplan is all .conf and new stuff is .ael. I find AEL to be the better option when jumping around, but that's just my opinion. Mik Alan Lord (News) wrote: Hi all, I built my first asterisk using the traditional (?) .conf files and constructs. I recall

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailinglists

2009-01-28 Thread Mik Cheez
This is a good point. Knowing the outcome is important, and hopefully it will get more people to post once the problem has been resolved. David fire wrote: one very important thing that will help to improve the list is when someone solve the problem put an email [solved]original subject

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Mik Cheez
It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained on voip-info.org People don't ask stupid questions because of a lack of a FAQ to read, they ask stupid questions because they're too lazy do to the footwork. Robert Broyles wrote: I think we'd be better off posting a

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Mik Cheez
If you find something on a WIKI that is outdated, guess what you have an opportunity to do . . . Noah Miller wrote: It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained on voip-info.org Hmm. Dangerous statement. There are many things on the WIKI that are quite

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Mik Cheez
Don't over think this, guys. Again, the point of having a WIKI is to allow for customization. A landing page for Asterisk documentation within voip-info.org is all you need, not a whole new source of documentation. Jai Rangi wrote: ** I understand. As someone else already

Re: [asterisk-users] DNS Query Overload

2008-09-22 Thread Mik Cheez
What you should do, assuming that each DNS request is invalid and returns nothing, is add a fake domain on your box that all of these requests will point to. That is, if mydomain.com is the DNS name it's looking up, add mydomain.com to a named server on the same box. Make sure you include

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk stress call test

2008-08-15 Thread Mik Cheez
I had done something similar in the past, and I have one suggestion that may be helpful; the call files are set to be checked every second, which can bottleneck the system a bit. You can modify the code (pbx_spool.c) to check in fractions of a second, which should keep the calls more fluid.

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk stress call test

2008-08-15 Thread Mik Cheez
Aby, Assuming you're building Asterisk from source, you can change the following in the scan_thread function: change- sleep(1); to- /*sleep(1);*/ usleep(10); This will change the delay from 1 second to 10 microseconds (0.1 second).

Re: [asterisk-users] Newbie Queue: Code your own queue for AgentCallBackLogin

2008-07-30 Thread Mik Cheez
There's actually a document included with the source code which will take you through setting up an agent callback system. You can find it in 'doc/queues-with-callback-members.txt'. The 'AgentCallBackLogin' application has some issues, and since you can do the same thing with your dialplan,

Re: [asterisk-users] how to stop web Click to Call fraud, robots, etc

2008-07-16 Thread Mik Cheez
Require that the user is logged in, and that the form has random text-image verification. Just my 2¢. Chris Earle wrote: Hi all, I'm writing some code to do a web 'click to dial' sort of thing. Where the surfer puts in their number and some php/asterisk API code Originates a call out to

[asterisk-users] DNS Query Overload

2008-06-26 Thread Mik Cheez
I'm finding that my Asterisk server is bombarding my DNS servers with lookups like the following: Queries 5060-b7bfce38: type A, class IN Name: 5060-b7bfce38 Type: A (Host address) Class: IN (0x0001) One call alone has a handful of requests

Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-04 Thread Mik Cheez
couldn't figure it out..any ideas ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mik Cheez Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:03 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT

Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-04 Thread Mik Cheez
PROTECTED]:1] Set(SIP/NPANXX7604-08c46518, CDR(userfield)=) in new stack Extension Changed NXX5557604 new state Idle for Notify User NXX5557555 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mik Cheez Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:39 AM

Re: [asterisk-users] More fun but with Wireshark capture

2008-05-22 Thread Mik Cheez
Something is certainly wrong here. Can you check the netmask? I assume you're just using a full class C, which would make the netmask 255.255.255.0. Also, should I assume the trace is being done on the Asterisk machine? Try running a trace on all interfaces for port 5060: ]# tethereal -i

Re: [asterisk-users] Out-Going Calleriid

2008-05-07 Thread Mik Cheez
Tim Guy wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling Sent: 07 May 2008 20:14 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Out-Going Calleriid The leading 0 is not part of

Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility

2008-04-30 Thread Mik Cheez
Have you tried kernel-smp-devel? Andreas van dem Helge wrote: Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says: echo You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. You do not appear to have the

Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility

2008-04-30 Thread Mik Cheez
-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-source-2.4.21-53.EL.i386 kernel-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.15.i386 On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Mik Cheez [EMAIL

Re: [asterisk-users] Jumped from 1.2.7 to 1.4.19, missing CLI colors

2008-04-09 Thread Mik Cheez
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you run asterisk as a service this happens. There is/was some dispute as to the fallacy of using 'safe_asterisk' anyway. Start it at the command line to see the pretty colors. Mike wrote: Hi, I`ve just made a leap from * 1.2.7 to 1.4.19. It took a while

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk as a SIP to XMPP Jingle voice gateway

2007-11-08 Thread Mik Cheez
Openser has SIP-to-XMPP Gateway and JABBER IM and PRESENCE interconnection modules. I used the XMPP module with Google Talk and Asterisk a while back. It resulted in a segmentation fault, but again that was a long time ago. Eric Chamberlain wrote: Hello, I’m looking for a SIP to

Re: [asterisk-users] Is there real benefits on a SMP machine for Asterisk?

2007-10-12 Thread Mik Cheez
In 'top', you can always look at what percentage of your CPU is idle. Subtract that from 100 and you've got your load average. Cpu(s): 1.1% us, 0.6% sy, 0.0% ni, *98.1% id*, 0.1% wa, 0.1% hi, 0.0% si Erik Anderson wrote: On 10/12/07, Philipp Kempgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't

Re: [asterisk-users] Is there real benefits on a SMP machine for Asterisk?

2007-10-12 Thread Mik Cheez
Sorry...I should have been more specific in my original reply. In 'top', you can always look at what percentage of your CPU is idle. Subtract that from 100 and you've got your load average. I should have said you get your average load percentage, rather than just average load. Mik Cheez

Re: [asterisk-users] Is there real benefits on a SMP machine for Asterisk?

2007-10-12 Thread Mik Cheez
%si,0.0%st Cpu1:0.0%us,0.0%sy,100.0%ni,0.0%id,0.0%wa,0.0%hi,0.0%si,0.0%st Cpu2:0.0%us,0.3%sy,98.0%ni,0.0%id,0.0%wa,1.7%hi,0.0%si,0.0%st Cpu3: 0.0%us,0.7%sy,99.3%ni,0.0%id,0.0%wa,0.0%hi,0.0%si,0.0%st According to what you are saying my load average should be 100. Thanks, Steve Mik Cheez

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk realtime error

2007-09-26 Thread Mik Cheez
Is your mysql.sock actually in /var/lib/mysql/ ? RENZZO SOTOMAYOR wrote: Hi! I am proving Asterisk 1.2.24 in realtime with MySQL 5.0.27 using Idefisk softphones. I followed the steps of how to of voip-org but always have this error: Sep 25 20:29:07 WARNING[12000]: res_config_mysql.c:360

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk w/MS SQL Server 2005

2007-09-04 Thread Mik Cheez
You can use Asterisk's AGI and PHP/Perl or whatever else. You'll need to install connecting software, such as FreeTDS, to connect to SQL. Then you can either pass arguments to your script or use environment variables to set Asterisk variables. Here's a good place to start:

Re: [asterisk-users] [PHP-AGI] Problem executing script

2007-08-23 Thread Mik Cheez
Did you confirm that the file exists? /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/rabot.agi Also, in your script (wherever it actually is), put a space between php and -q #!/usr/bin/php -q Karim H wrote: Hello, I have succeded in compiling and configuring My TDM Card and asterisk, all works fine. But I

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.9.tar.gz download fails

2007-07-25 Thread Mik Cheez
aka. the FTP site is back up dave cantera wrote: ed, do you positively have to have 1.4.0? just download 1.4.9 or 1.4.8... 1.4.0 is too old... I can email you 1.4.8, 1.4.5, 1.4.9... I just downloaded 1.4.9 from:

Re: [asterisk-users] REGEX expression for NXXNXXXXXX?

2007-07-05 Thread Mik Cheez
This would let you include/ignore a leading 1 1{0,1}[2-9]{2}[0-9]{8} Brent Torrenga wrote: Hola, What would a valid regexp in Asterisk be to identify a NANP number, i.e., NXXNXX? Sincerely, Brent A. Torrenga Torrenga Engineering, Inc. 907 Ridge Road Munster, Indiana

Re: [asterisk-users] REGEX expression for NXXNXXXXXX?

2007-07-05 Thread Mik Cheez
My mistake...you're correct...should have tested it. Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote: But those are not REGEX expressions, those are asterisk dialplan pattern-matching expressions. great for the X in: exten = _X.,1,blah but not for use with REGEX() function. I think it would be

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Load/Stress scripts?

2007-02-01 Thread Mik Cheez
Use auto dial. You can have as many calls as you wish. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+auto-dial+out Porier, Jeremy M. wrote: Are there any scripts out there that would help me stress test two boxes that are setup back to back with 4 PRI connections? We're having problems with

Re: [asterisk-users] [resolved] asterisk 1,4 and google talk

2006-11-10 Thread Mik Cheez
Mani, I've gotten the same result both dialing from a gtalk client to SIP, as well as an SIP call to gtalk. You can run a jabber debug before the call is placed to see more debug info on what's causing the crash. With the module in Beta, I believe it's just a bug that needs to be worked out.

[asterisk-users] Realtime sippeers using NAT

2006-11-10 Thread Mik Cheez
I'm running sippeers and sipusers in my extconfig, and everything runs perfectly when a client is registered (ex. registers to port 1000), but when it re-registers the client is set to port 5060. This behavior does not take place if I use the static files. Both in my sip_buddies table for db,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

2005-08-10 Thread Mik Cheez
That was an April Fools Day joke...unfortunately whoever started it didn't think about what it would do to the Archive. Justin Selleck wrote: Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot find it anywhere.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Alternatives to Digium 729

2005-07-21 Thread Mik Cheez
Olle E. Johansson wrote: Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Wednesday 20 July 2005 20:15, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: As I understand it, adding VAD/Silence would require redesigning the entire RTP stack of Asterisk. My understanding is that with the new jitter buffer both of

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Lucent TNT ASTERISK

2005-05-16 Thread Mik Cheez
Why not use SIP? list wrote: Anybody using asterisk to talk to a lucent tnt gatekeeper via h323? Any suggestions or recommendations about how I can get this working? Any config examples? thanks, jon ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list

Re: [Asterisk-Users] How does the g.729 registration program work?

2005-02-25 Thread Mik Cheez
There is an open source version of the license: http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/g729/INSTALL-041103.txt You can view the licensing information at the following: http://www.intel.com/software/products/ipp/ more details can be found on http://www.voip-info.org Steven Critchfield wrote: On Fri,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] How does the g.729 registration program work?

2005-02-25 Thread Mik Cheez
Thanks for the clarification. In that case the following should only be considered for development. Steven Critchfield wrote: On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 09:25 -0800, Mik Cheez wrote: There is an open source version of the license: http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/g729/INSTALL-041103.txt You

[Asterisk-Users] SER vs. Asterisk - call in progress to PSTN

2005-02-25 Thread Mik Cheez
We're having a problem with Asterisk when we try to pass a call off to a Lucent PSTN using SIP. This behavior does not exist with SER: With Asterisk An ISDN call is started, at the T1 level we receive call proceeding and immediately we receive a Call in Progress just like the far end party