sure it does, how is this any different from--
I'm having trouble with hardware component X and I can't seem to get
help from the vendor. Does anyone have any suggestions?
-reed
brian wrote:
Please take this off list and email [EMAIL PROTECTED] it has NO PLACE HERE!
bkw
-Original
It seems like it might be nice to have a mailing list to talk about (and
to) voip providers for Asterisk users.
It would be a good place to share info about config, pricing news,
customer service, local numbers, transient outages, etc. Providers would
be encouraged to contribute sales info.
Eric Wieling wrote:
I thought that is what the Asterisk-Biz mailing list was for.
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
I'm thinking more along the lines of hey, VoicePulse is broken today
type of email. Which, in fact, is what got me thinking of it when I had
VoicePulse
John Todd wrote:
Would providers actually contribute meaningful discussion and data on
such a list? My experience shows that the majority of providers that I
know (and have worked with or for) and who use Asterisk have not once,
ever, posted anything to either the -dev list or the -users
I had in and outbound problems with them for at least a couple of hours
early this afternoon. Seems to be ok now tho.
-reed
Scott Weis wrote:
Inbound is working here, no problems that I know of.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: C. Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
fun !!!
On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 02:35, Reed Wade wrote:
Can someone tell me how to build festival on a machine with gcc 3.3.2?
I've searched all around and even found a reference or two that the
problem exists but I'm not seeing the fix.
thanks!
-reed
Symtoms are --
./configure, then
[EMAIL
With shipping, I recall my 102 came to $97. I think it was $85 but
I'd need to look it up and don't have the papers nearby.
-reed
At 06:39 PM 7/30/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I was quoted $75 and $85 USD today.
Ricardo Villa
http://www.telesip.net
- Original Message -
From: Joe Cooke [EMAIL
Send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did this late Friday afternoon and Jeremy had me set up in
very short order. (I gave him wrong contact info Friday but he
IM'd me the needed account info Saturday morning.)
I've got problems with my own IP connection but aside from
that the service just works.
Just to toss in my very limited experiences with the Grandstream phone--
I haven't tested it enough to really know nor is my Asterisk
config set up enough to fully try all the features.
Mostly, it just works. It was very easy to configure and
get running. I've been toting it around to clients as
Just to add another data point -- I have never had my BudgeTone 102
fail to get NTP service. I've used it behind two different NAT'd
networks with relatively relaxed firewalls.
-reed
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The best solution would be an enhancement to the X100P card.
If the 2nd RJ jack was a pass through for the line except
when the card had power and was initialized. Some kind of
watchdog functionality would also be nice so that if, for
example, Asterisk dies then pass through functionality would
At 11:34 AM 7/14/2003 -0500, Steven Critchfield wrote:
One wouldn't use a X100P in a serious system.
How so? I assume you're talking about scale and not
reliability. We get a relatively small number of calls
but any one of them could be worth a large stack of
cash for our business. A stinky
At 12:57 PM 7/14/2003 -0500, you wrote:
This makes me think that you could take this a step further too and
incorporate an external power supply and a relay that could interupt
mains power so that you could power cycle the PC if the watchdog had
power to operate and the PC wasn't responding or
Because you haven't written and contributed that functionality yet.
(smiley face goes here)
That sounds pretty sweet. I'm wondering if LDAP might be the more
correct thing to use though.
-reed
At 10:50 AM 6/24/2003 -0600, you wrote:
I've been scouring the archives for discussions on this:
thanks to everyone for your gracious assistance; it stills wants
plenty of minor adjustments but I now have the core of a nicely working
system
-reed
At 11:56 PM 6/17/2003 -0500, John Laur wrote:
So far, I've only been able to get the XTEN Lite phone working
and I really don't understand how
Hi,
I'm experimenting with the dev kit lite and now past the USB
unpleasantness it's working great with standard phones and
lines.
The priority right now is getting soft phones (under Windows
XP) working well.
So far, I've only been able to get the XTEN Lite phone working
and I really don't
I was about to say 'yes' and they were worse but now I can't
remember for certain. I'll try those again to make sure.
Are they likely to be better?
-reed
At 02:27 PM 6/18/2003 +1000, Gary wrote:
tried the ilbc and speex yet ??
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:15:38 -0400, Reed Wade wrote:
I've
17 matches
Mail list logo
