On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:04:10PM -0500, Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote:
-Original Message---
I just bought two new Linksys WRT54G routers. Sveasoft has loaded Linux
on this router and included a bunch of Linux tools, one of which is
Bandwidth Management.
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:53:50PM -0500, Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote:
Tell me which one can get me access to the LinkSys Linux using SSH? Does
Satori has this feature? I am not so concerned with Voice Shaping and
QOS at this time, but more interested in converting this into a Linux
box
OK, the line's now set to ETSI, still having probs.
Anyone got some working configs ?
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Phone/Fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
SMS steve-epage (at) gbnet.net [body] gpg 1024D/468952DB 2001-09-19
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL
Has anyone got a working config for a Marconi System X (Q.931) and
Digium TE410P?
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Phone/Fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
SMS steve-epage (at) gbnet.net [body] gpg 1024D/468952DB 2001-09-19
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 06:10:21AM +0900, Kuniyoshi Murata wrote:
http://www.pcphoneline.com/skype
If I have a spare PC-AT running Windows 2000/XP and use their devices to
convert skype's input and output to conventional phone jack, I guess I can
connect that to Asterisk and skype can be one
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 10:16:08PM +, Storer, Darren wrote:
Hi Steve,
Hi, name rings a bell for some reason ?
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:05:18 +, Steve Kennedy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone got a working config for a Marconi System X (Q.931) and
Digium TE410P?
Check out
I've set-up a mirror at
ftp.gbnet.net/pub/digium
It's (sort of) available via www.gbnet.net/public
Mirror's the whole of ftp.asterisk.org/pub
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Phone/Fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
SMS steve-epage (at) gbnet.net [body] gpg 1024D/468952DB 2001-09-19
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:37:55AM +0300, Nana Yaw wrote:
hello steve,
I am interested to know how this is illegal, where is it written?
In the UK there were various companies offering fixed to mobile
gateways. The gateways generally were black boxes with PRI's on one
side, and mobile
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:00:09PM +0100, Chris Lee wrote:
Miroslav Nachev wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for GSM to BRI ISDN Gateway. Any help?
I was also looking for such things nd came across these guys:
http://www.2n.cz/export
they have a product or two for GSM
and here is the one I found
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 03:10:25PM +0900, Sunrise Ltd wrote:
Ming-Wei Shih wrote (Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for
Asterisk)
I am running * CVS head on Gentoo/i586
and Gentoo/Sparc64 (US60 2x450/1GB RAM),
they are running great.
On sparc64 * does not compile out-of-the-box,
some
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:50:40PM +0100, Chris Bond wrote:
What I want to know is why you can port mobile numbers from network to
network but say you have a local std code and you wanted to use that with a
VoIP provider in the UK - in most instances you cant. Some are available to
offer STD
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:49:57AM -0500, Chris Luke wrote:
[stuff snipped]
http://www.btwholesale.com/content/binaries/service_and_support/pricing_information/carrier_price_list_browsable/b1_08.rtf
Tells you how much geographic number portability costs with BT, though
you may also need to
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 07:19:44PM -0800, rich allen wrote:
what do you mean not quite right???
if the clid is supposed to be blocked then don't send it. if the far
end is a law enforcement or emergency agency then the clid is NOT
supposed to be blocked!! if the originating switch had the
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 07:57:36AM -0800, rich allen wrote:
this is really simple, companies like Nortel, Lucent need to change
their code for caller id, if the number should be blocked then dont
transmit it to the far end switch
Err, not quite right.
There are a few circumstances when
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 05:12:15PM +0200, Philipp von Klitzing wrote:
Hi!
for subsequent reference. Another benefit with SMS is remote alarm handling
which is easier to guarantee because the messages are sent via a store and
forward system
BUT: There is no guarantee that a SMS message
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 07:06:22PM -0700, George Pajari wrote:
http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2004/0607faceoffyes.html
There are very valid arguments in the contra argument. If you have
existing equipment it's all about integration. Traditional telcos are
moving to VoIP as are enterprise
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 05:06:09PM -0500, Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 15:12, Jay Milk wrote:
Since this is related... Does anyone have Asterisk working on a
Flash-drive? I was considering this as an alternative to having a
harddrive in my machine, thus keeping down
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Craig Waddington wrote:
Currently using voiptalk.org and the quality is getting really bad.
I would like a second provider preferably in UK, anyone got any suggestions?
That's the trouble with running VoIP over contended public Internet.
Find someone
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:02:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the UK, with the sort of equipment that BT has in its network, you're
lucky to even get adsl going through! ISPs can only provide QoS up to a
certain boundary. After that it is out of their control!
It depends on what
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 07:09:57PM -0400, Jon Pounder wrote:
FYI
http://www.itbusiness.ca/index.asp?theaction=61sid=55298
did not like this by line in the story
the CRTC has said it will likely regulate voice over IP the same as other
phone services.
I noticed exactly the same thing
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:33:18PM +0100, Linus Surguy wrote:
I've just been onto BT again, and it seems they did have CLIP on the
line for a few minutes, but then they removed it again and put COLP on,
which they then told me was the same as CLIP... monkeys :(
Wait... I take that back..
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 11:23:53PM -0500, Darren Nickerson wrote:
I strongly support removing the current reply-to-list setting, and you
should too.
I would agree with this too, when replying to a post, the reply should
be to the sender, if the receipient wants to reply to everyone, then
they
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 03:14:48AM -0500, Brian Capouch wrote:
After reading a (hopefully) joke web news article today that said the
RIAA was thinking about asking automobile owners to pay extra royalties
when there's more than one passenger in the car, I began to worry about
putting the
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:41:00PM +, Michael T Farnworth wrote:
Mark Phillips wrote:
What codecs are you using? You should be able to get quite a few speex
channels or even a load of 729 or gsm channels down your 256K.
You always have to remember that a UK ADSL line has a contention
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 04:40:38PM -0500, John Fraizer wrote:
Steve Kennedy wrote:
It't not quite that simple, DSL in the UK is PPPoATM, so you need to
take into account who IP is encoded at the ATM layer etc. If you're
using a reasonable bit rate codec, you can't really expect to get much
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:40:09PM +0200, Stephen Davies wrote:
So - what to do? If I approach the administrators for e164.arpa
([EMAIL PROTECTED], apparently) will they delegate 7.2.e164.arpa
to me?
I guess that they won't. (It would be fun if they
would, for some definition of fun (I
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:08:29PM -0600, Michael Graves wrote:
I have disagree about the ADSL. I have a1.5 Mbit/512kbit service from
Covad (in the US Southwest) and I have sustained 4 calls without a
problem. I prefer to use GSM over G.711to squeeze it down, but that is
my choice. I don't
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:04:23AM +, WipeOut wrote:
On the UK DSL using G.711 you should easily get 2 concurrect calls,
G.711 uses about 84k(incl overhead) in each direction, so 2 calls would
be 168K (of the 256k)
It all to do with running IP/ATM (BT's ADSL is all over ATM) and how the
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:40:25AM +, WipeOut wrote:
Like I said you should be able to easily do 6 when using GSM..
I have done 2 concurrent iLBC through IAX calls over a 64k ISDN link.. :)
ISDN is a 64K symmetrical system, ADSL is assymmetrical ... that's where
the problems occur, and
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:23:08PM -, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
You could port your numbers to a licenced telco... Install SDSL (or even
ADSL if you have a lot of faith in your current provider) and get all
lines working throught SDSL.. :) You prabably should keep one BT line
for fax and/or
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 08:10:11PM -, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Steve Kennedy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:23:08PM -, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
You could port your numbers to a licenced telco... Install SDSL (or
even ADSL if you have a lot of faith in your current provider
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 03:31:29AM +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
The left hand pedal on a church organ is around 16Hz. Below that things
don't really sound like tones any more.
I believe some old churches in the UK (that's old to the US folks here
:) have pipes with MUCH lower frequencies,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:05:37PM -0500, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
If you can help out and post the document it would be a big help. We have picked
all are vendor/partners in the states and the UK is next. Also if you can reccomend
any voice providers we can work with I will be in the UK next
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:31:06PM -0500, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
Thank you, now I am off to get licensed in the UK
Since the Communications Act came into force there are no such things as
licenses per se. The Communications Act specifies 21 obligations that
a Communications Service Provider
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:47:11AM -0500, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
Does anyone know where I can find some more info on the VoIP laws in the EU?
VoIP in the EU hasn't been completely sorted centrally (i.e. by the EU
parliament), last time they looked at it a few years ago it wasn't
perceived to be
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 07:38:15PM +, Iain Stevenson wrote:
The problem with the Ofcom consultation as I see it is that it seems to be
regressive wrt to the position now being taken by the FCC. There are
probably not many more than 250,000 VoB users worldwide so now is not the
time to
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 04:51:08PM +, WipeOut wrote:
I am going to an Oftel meeting to discuss VoB regulation next week..
Hopefully this will help to see where it is heading..
Of course Oftel doesn't exist anymore, it's all Ofcom now ...
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Phone/Fax +44-(0)20 7483
Probably a dumb question, but what's the best Linux variant to use to
build/run an Asterisk server.
Hardware is Compaq DL360 with a Widcard 410.
Debian/Fedora Core ?
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Phone/Fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
SMS steve-epage (at) gbnet.net [body] gpg 1024D/468952DB 2001-09-19
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:24:17PM -0600, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
IANAL, but this seems like a legal grey area, as the FCC has
been pushing against regulating VoIP services, which may mean
that VoIP services are not legally considered communication, which
would exclude them from CALEA.
201 - 239 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
