On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 18:55, Jonathan Moore wrote:
> Quoting Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Anyways, while hotswap PSUs may not be important, any machine that is
> > important is important enough for redundant supplies. It doesn't add
> > much to the cost of the case and is a good i
Quoting Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Anyways, while hotswap PSUs may not be important, any machine that is
> important is important enough for redundant supplies. It doesn't add
> much to the cost of the case and is a good insurance policy.
> --
> Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 10:26, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > SCSI controllers shouldn't get spooked by drive failures. Just choose
> > good controllers. This can be difficult as you find out that even
> > Adaptec has been known to have controllers that don't work well under
> > some loads in linux. Del
> SCSI controllers shouldn't get spooked by drive failures. Just choose
> good controllers. This can be difficult as you find out that even
> Adaptec has been known to have controllers that don't work well under
> some loads in linux. Dell has a mailing list that basically is devoted
> to the fixin
Steven Critchfield <> wrote:
> SCSI controllers shouldn't get spooked by drive failures. Just choose
> good controllers. This can be difficult as you find out that even
Along that vein, does anyone have any experience with Mylex 64bit PCI
eXtremeRaid 1100? Computer Geeks has it on sale for $59...
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 09:31, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > My take on redundancy is to use a real server with disk mirroring and
> > redundant power supplies.
>
> That's hardly redundant. What if you lose a disk controller? Or any part
> of the motherboard? Or CPU? Power supplies can and have f
> My take on redundancy is to use a real server with disk mirroring and
> redundant power supplies.
That's hardly redundant. What if you lose a disk controller? Or any part
of the motherboard? Or CPU? Power supplies can and have failed in ways
that manage to take out system components. :-)
-
From: "Jonathan Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits and redundancy
> This is esp true of any VoIP PBX system. In fact I think many of them run
Windows.
>
> I do ha
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits and redundancy
> This is esp true of any VoIP PBX system. In fact I think many of the
This is esp true of any VoIP PBX system. In fact I think many of them run Windows.
I do have a related question about how * users are creating redundancy in thier
setups? I am going live in a few days with a single office setup where I have
patched the * PBX in front of our existing legacy phone s
10 matches
Mail list logo
