ulaw was neccessary when pass through was disabled. What does a sip
debug tell you ?
Hans
Garth van Sittert schrieb:
I am using alaw and I have already enabled the pass through. Does alaw
and ulaw work?
I can fax out, but not receive faxes.
Garth
Johann Steinwendtner wrote:
Enable pass t
Garth,
this is my sip-configuration for a fax machine at a AT386
; SIP Accounts Analog devices like Faxmachines
[analogdefaults](!)
type=friend
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=info
disallow=all
allow=gsm
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw
[222](analogdefaults)
context=sip-ol
callerid="Fax" <222>
username=222
I am using alaw and I have already enabled the pass through. Does alaw
and ulaw work?
I can fax out, but not receive faxes.
Garth
Johann Steinwendtner wrote:
Enable pass thru fax mode on the HT486, or enable ulaw in your SIP
config.
Hans
Garth van Sittert schrieb:
Hi All
Is there any s
Enable pass thru fax mode on the HT486, or enable ulaw in your SIP config.
Hans
Garth van Sittert schrieb:
Hi All
Is there any special configuration needed to send and receive faxes on
an ATA device?
I am using G711.a with a Grandstream Handytone 486. I can send faxes
from a fax machine on
Hi All
Is there any special configuration needed to send and receive faxes on
an ATA device?
I am using G711.a with a Grandstream Handytone 486. I can send faxes
from a fax machine on the ATA, but receiving doesn't work. I get the
fax signal, but it just doesn't continue. The LAN is used pu
joash
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006
12:01 PM
To:
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ATA's
???
Hi,
I'm
currently in the process of building Asterisk f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently in the process of building Asterisk for our new office and
have hit a snag. We need two internal Analog lines for a modem and fax
machine. Am I right in thinking I can use two ATA's, one on each piece
of equipment which will then talk to Asterisk
Hi Phil,
if you want to use ATAs take a look at grandstream site...they are
better than digium but you could use a card, TDM400 is excellent for
analog lines and devices.
Giorgio Incantalupo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently in the process of building Asterisk for our new office
Hi,
I'm currently in the process of building
Asterisk for our new office and have hit a snag. We need two internal
Analog lines for a modem and fax machine. Am I right in thinking
I can use two ATA's, one on each piece of equipment which will then talk
to Asterisk and route via our ISDN30?
If
[...] In the meantime, get a Sipura 2100, supports 2 729 calls and
has both WAN/LAN ports.
I was told that the Uniden DTA200 also supports 2 g729 calls. I'm
buying one to test. Street price around US$ 90.
Another one with dual g729 channels is MTA V102. Street price US$ 100.
Also will test this
On Feb 15, 2005, at 6:08 PM, Leo Ann Boon wrote:
From my experience, the ATA is a very solid, dependable piece of
hardware. I was told by a source in the company that OEMs for Cisco,
the units are expensive because of the high quality parts being used.
The web config looks crappy but otherwise w
David Uzzell wrote:
Shaun Ewing wrote:
I'm using the ATA 186 and think it's great. The latest firmware also
changes the web interface - it's similar to the 7905G/7912G phones
now.
Did you have much trouble getting the ATA 186 working?
No.
I have one running Version: v3.1.0 atasip (Build 040211A)
Shaun Ewing wrote:
I'm using the ATA 186 and think it's great. The latest firmware also
changes the web interface - it's similar to the 7905G/7912G phones
now.
Did you have much trouble getting the ATA 186 working?
I have one running Version: v3.1.0 atasip (Build 040211A)
I have it setup and it do
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:08:08 +0800, Leo Ann Boon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See my comments in line
> From my experience, the ATA is a very solid, dependable piece of
> hardware. I was told by a source in the company that OEMs for Cisco, the
> units are expensive because of the high quality part
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:40:24PM -0600, Matthew Boehm wrote:
> > wrong withe the SPA-2100. The only thing the SPA-2100 (still) lacks is
> > a "bridge mode", where the LAN and WAN ports would act just like a
> > switch, so that you can easily chain devices without routing/NAT. Just
> > like most I
See my comments in line
Mark Eissler wrote:
On Feb 15, 2005, at 3:17 AM, Voip Business wrote:
hello, my experience
1.-Azatel Azacall 200 GREAT PIECE OF HARDWARE
2.- MTA-V102
3.- Sipura spa 2000
4.- Granstream
ATA186 SUXs
I can't speak so fondly of the Azatel which I had sitting around after
a can
There are tons of comments about the S100i, or IAXy, as it's called.
Can't say I like it myself, we have 3 of them right now, and they get
really hot and for some reason don't have the MAC address labeled on
them, and also we couldn't get them to actually take an IP from a
Microsoft DHCP server (wo
> wrong withe the SPA-2100. The only thing the SPA-2100 (still) lacks is
> a "bridge mode", where the LAN and WAN ports would act just like a
> switch, so that you can easily chain devices without routing/NAT. Just
> like most IP phones do.
So what happens if you try and chain a bunch of SPA-2
: Erick Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 11:30 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ATA's
>
>
> what about the digium S100i, haven't used but any comments?
> i know it
what about the digium S100i, haven't used but any comments?
i know it's only one fxs one lan port does g711 also. no g729.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:29:35 -0500, Mark Eissler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2005, at 3:17 AM, Voip Business wrote:
>
> > hello, my experience
> >
> > 1.-Aza
On Feb 15, 2005, at 3:17 AM, Voip Business wrote:
hello, my experience
1.-Azatel Azacall 200 GREAT PIECE OF HARDWARE
2.- MTA-V102
3.- Sipura spa 2000
4.- Granstream
ATA186 SUXs
I can't speak so fondly of the Azatel which I had sitting around after
a canceling a VOIP service. Maybe I just need a ne
hello, my experience
1.-Azatel Azacall 200 GREAT PIECE OF HARDWARE
2.- MTA-V102
3.- Sipura spa 2000
4.- Granstream
ATA186 SUXs
Excuse me I have just bought a PAP2 ,, is it true that only one g729,
one of the Damn things Cisco had in the ATA186? at the same time.
DAMN , its just a Sipura insid
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:47:23PM +0900, Hermann Wecke wrote:
> Matthew Boehm wrote:
> >[...] In the meantime, get a Sipura 2100, supports 2 729 calls and
> >has both WAN/LAN ports.
>
> I was told that the Uniden DTA200 also supports 2 g729 calls. I'm buying
> one to test. Street price around US
Matthew Boehm wrote:
[...] In the meantime, get a Sipura 2100, supports 2 729 calls and
has both WAN/LAN ports.
I was told that the Uniden DTA200 also supports 2 g729 calls. I'm buying
one to test. Street price around US$ 90.
Another one with dual g729 channels is MTA V102. Street price US$ 100.
On Feb 14, 2005, at 5:39 AM, Nicolas Bougues wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 07:43:06PM -0600, Matthew Boehm wrote:
We have had a big success with the Linksys PAP2-NA. 2 FX ports and 1
WAN
port. Only downside is that only 1 call can be using 729 at a time.
This has
been confirmed with Linksys. The
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 10:39:36AM -0800, Luki wrote:
> The Sipuras have a ton of configurable parameters. If you understand
> them (and there is no good manual, unfortunately) then you can be of
> great benefit. Otherwise they'll be worthless. I particularly miss the
> dial-plan, distinctive ring
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 07:43:06PM -0600, Matthew Boehm wrote:
> We have had a big success with the Linksys PAP2-NA. 2 FX ports and 1 WAN
> port. Only downside is that only 1 call can be using 729 at a time. This has
> been confirmed with Linksys. They will be releasing PAP2-NAv2 in March to
> over
and
has both WAN/LAN ports. Personally, I dislike the lack of LEDs on the 2100.
-Matthew
- Original Message -
From: "Luki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Ast
> -Original Message-
> From: Luki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The Sipuras have a ton of configurable parameters. If you
> understand them (and there is no good manual, unfortunately)
Really? 87 pages aren't enough for you?
http://www.sipura.com/Documents/SipuraSPAUserGuidev2.0.9.pd
Sascha E. Pollok wrote:
Good evening,
allow me to join in right here. Which ATA/TA would you
suggest for connecting analogue fax machines to Asterisk?
One of the ones named before or e.g. a ATA-186 made by Cisco?
At the moment I am deploying Grandstream ATAs for faxing machines with
out a problem
Good evening,
allow me to join in right here. Which ATA/TA would you
suggest for connecting analogue fax machines to Asterisk?
One of the ones named before or e.g. a ATA-186 made by Cisco?
Cheers
Sascha
> The Sipuras have a ton of configurable parameters. If you understand
> them (and there is n
The Sipuras have a ton of configurable parameters. If you understand
them (and there is no good manual, unfortunately) then you can be of
great benefit. Otherwise they'll be worthless. I particularly miss the
dial-plan, distinctive ring and audio gain options on the
Grandstreams. Remote syslog can
Anton Krall wrote:
Guys.. which ATA is better for connecting analog phones (features,
stability, experiences, etc)?
Sipura 2000 or Handy Tone 286, etc?
What are you experiences?
In my experience the Sipura 2000 has three hardware advantages:
* 2 independent phone ports
* Mounting holes
* The p
Guys.. which ATA is better for connecting analog phones (features,
stability, experiences, etc)?
Sipura 2000 or Handy Tone 286, etc?
What are you experiences?
__
Anton Krall
___
Ast
34 matches
Mail list logo
