Has anyone successfully built Asterisk with linux 2.6.9 kernel? It fails
in my zaptel build trying to find a Makefile in the
/lib/modules/2.6.9/build directory - thanks.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Symlink /lib/modules/2.6.9/build to /usr/src/linux
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven P. Donegan
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk/linux 2.6.9 kernel
/linux 2.6.9 kernel build failure
Has anyone successfully built Asterisk with linux 2.6.9 kernel? It fails
in my zaptel build trying to find a Makefile in the
/lib/modules/2.6.9/build directory - thanks.
shouldn't that be 'to /usr/src/linux-2.6
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 08:29 -0800, Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Has anyone successfully built Asterisk with linux 2.6.9 kernel?
Yes.
It fails
in my zaptel build trying to find a Makefile in the
/lib/modules/2.6.9/build directory - thanks.
Someone posted a patch for the zaptel Makefile and it
-Users] Asterisk/linux 2.6.9 kernel build failure
Has anyone successfully built Asterisk with linux 2.6.9 kernel? It
fails
in my zaptel build trying to find a Makefile in the
/lib/modules/2.6.9/build directory - thanks.
shouldn't that be 'to /usr/src/linux-2.6
Richard Lyman wrote:
Brian West wrote:
Symlink /lib/modules/2.6.9/build to /usr/src/linux
shouldn't that be 'to /usr/src/linux-2.6'
Yes, also FYI I had problems building zaptel 1.0 on 2.6.9-1.681_FC3smp
(error with a reference to non-existent sk_buf-ethernet.mac or similar)
but there is a
Andy Burns wrote:
Richard Lyman wrote:
Brian West wrote:
Symlink /lib/modules/2.6.9/build to /usr/src/linux
shouldn't that be 'to /usr/src/linux-2.6'
Yes, also FYI I had problems building zaptel 1.0 on 2.6.9-1.681_FC3smp
(error with a reference to non-existent sk_buf-ethernet.mac or
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cotton
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 11:41 AM
To: Asterisk List
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk/linux 2.6.9 kernel build failure
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 08:29 -0800, Steven
] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cotton
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 11:41 AM
To: Asterisk List
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk/linux 2.6.9 kernel build failure
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 08:29 -0800, Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Has anyone successfully built Asterisk
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Brian West wrote:
I don't agree with this patch yet... It's the distro's fault for doing this
wrong and I don't feel we have to work around it. The few people I talked
to have Symlinks the build to /usr/src/linux or the like. Then again I
may be wrong anyone know what
Peter Svensson wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Brian West wrote:
I don't agree with this patch yet... It's the distro's fault for doing this
wrong and I don't feel we have to work around it. The few people I talked
to have Symlinks the build to /usr/src/linux or the like. Then again I
may be
On Sunday 28 November 2004 19:25, Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Peter Svensson wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Brian West wrote:
I don't agree with this patch yet... It's the distro's fault for doing
this wrong and I don't feel we have to work around it. The few people I
talked to have Symlinks the
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Bob Goddard wrote:
On Sunday 28 November 2004 19:25, Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Well - if 2.6.etc did adopt this it isn't reflected in actual make/make
install world - i.e. nothing gets installed in /lib/modules/anywhere...
And this is with kernel source from kernel.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
