> Check out HAAST (High Availability ASTerisk) at [1]www.generationd.com
Bit out of my pricing. It must be possible to do it using downloadable
open-source.
Dan
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digit
> How do you handle replicating voice mails?
I do that by putting the voicemails into MYSQL and replicating that.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live in
risk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Benny Amorsen
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 5:36 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
Michelle Dupuis writes:
> Ch
ot be everything to
> everybody...
>
> From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
> [asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Vahan Yerkanian
> [va...@arminco.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 1:02 PM
> To: Asterisk U
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Vahan Yerkanian
[va...@arminco.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 1:02 PM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On 9/27/10 8:57 PM, Michelle Dupuis wrot
On 9/27/10 8:57 PM, Michelle Dupuis wrote:
> HAAST runs a sync script a regular intervals (time to sync data prior to a
> failover check etc)
>
> HAAST includes a sample script which syncs voicemail (and config, etc) files
> using rsync from master to slave. After a master/slave reversal the p
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Benny Amorsen
[benny+use...@amorsen.dk]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 10:35 AM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
Michelle Dupuis
Michelle Dupuis writes:
> Check out HAAST (High Availability ASTerisk) at [1]www.generationd.com
> (also on the voip wiki)
>
> You get the cluster/heartbeat & replication without needing to add openSER
> or full HAlinux. A simpler approach - easier to config and manage
How do you handle replicat
1:04 AM
> *To:* Asterisk Users List
> *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Are there any guides to setting up high-availability asterisk platforms?
> Maybe using Opensips.
>
>
>
> I found this diagram, but i cant find any
manage
MD
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Dan Journo
[...@keshercommunications.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 11:04 AM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
Hello,
Are there any
Hello,
Are there any guides to setting up high-availability asterisk platforms? Maybe
using Opensips.
I found this diagram, but i cant find any guides on how to go about setting it
up.
http://yfrog.com/5unetworkexampleg
Thanks
Dan
--
__
by Kesher Communications Ltd.
>
>
>
> *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
> asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Totaro
> *Sent:* 07 March 2010 19:15
>
> *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> *Subject:* Re: [ast
ice and recommendations
given by Kesher Communications Ltd.
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
Sent: 07 March 2010 19:15
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] As
-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
> Sent: 14 February 2010 16:56
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Dan Journo
> wrote:
> > Hello,
>
Dan
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
Sent: 14 February 2010 16:56
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On
4 February 2010 16:56
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Dan Journo
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> My host just had a faulty power supply and therefore, my Asterisk server was
&
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Dan Journo
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> My host just had a faulty power supply and therefore, my Asterisk server was
> down for 7 hours.
>
> It was a Sunday so no one was making calls, however if it happened during
> the week, I’d have problems.
>
>
>
> I was trying to
>
> I’ve been googling “asterisk redundancy” but all I’ve found is questions,
> and no real answers.
>
Is this any help Dan?
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+High+Availability+Solutions
Chris
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Co
Hello,
My host just had a faulty power supply and therefore, my Asterisk server was
down for 7 hours.
It was a Sunday so no one was making calls, however if it happened during the
week, I'd have problems.
I was trying to find a whitepaper or advice on how to set up two Asterisk
servers to prov
Adrian Marsh wrote:
interested in how people are "clustering" Asterisk, if that's possible,
or how you might be achieving a redundant solution.
> I've a single Asterisk server driving the company. Its well backed-up, and
> I've a cloned machine that (in theory) with a DNS change could take over
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What we do is the following:
Our CPE (Customer premises equipment) registers via IAX with all of our
servers at the same time (with qualify turned on for the links).
All of the servers first try to reach numbers via local IAX links.
If this fails th
On 16:34, Sat 29 Sep 07, Doug wrote:
> At 04:57 9/29/2007, Michiel van Baak, wrote:
> >On 21:47, Fri 28 Sep 07, Doug wrote:
> >> At 20:53 9/28/2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >> >On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:28:18PM -0500, Doug wrote:
> >> >> >How do you do that when your single network connectio
At 04:57 9/29/2007, Michiel van Baak, wrote:
>On 21:47, Fri 28 Sep 07, Doug wrote:
>> At 20:53 9/28/2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> >On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:28:18PM -0500, Doug wrote:
>> >> >How do you do that when your single network connection is gone?
>> >>
>> >> Any suggestions on d
On 21:47, Fri 28 Sep 07, Doug wrote:
> At 20:53 9/28/2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:28:18PM -0500, Doug wrote:
> >> >How do you do that when your single network connection is gone?
> >>
> >> Any suggestions on dual-wan routers? We can't get this
> >> stupid Twin-Wan
At 20:53 9/28/2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:28:18PM -0500, Doug wrote:
>> >How do you do that when your single network connection is gone?
>>
>> Any suggestions on dual-wan routers? We can't get this
>> stupid Twin-Wan to work:
>>
>> http://www.xincom.com/twinwan.p
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:28:18PM -0500, Doug wrote:
> >How do you do that when your single network connection is gone?
>
> Any suggestions on dual-wan routers? We can't get this
> stupid Twin-Wan to work:
>
> http://www.xincom.com/twinwan.php
A PC?
--
Tzafrir Cohen
i
At 08:01 9/28/2007, Per Jessen wrote:
>Douglas Garstang wrote:
>
>>>Also be sure that you have a very redundant network configuration.
>>>Too often I see people spend a great deal of time and money to get
>>>redundant servers when their switches, firewalls, routers, etc are not
>>>even capabl
Douglas Garstang wrote:
>>Also be sure that you have a very redundant network configuration.
>>Too often I see people spend a great deal of time and money to get
>>redundant servers when their switches, firewalls, routers, etc are not
>>even capable of handling a failed network element.
>
> You c
>- Original Message
>From: Scott Moseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:07:06 AM
>Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
>
>On 9/26/07, SIP <[EMAIL PROT
>- Original Message
>From: SIP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 4:31:08 AM
>Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
>
>Per Je
On 9/26/07, SIP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No. It's not. But there still exists the possibility even in a
> relatively stable situation that the software could crash or that
> hardware could fail. It's best, when planning a highly-available
> solution, to plan for the unforeseen and not assume
Per Jessen wrote:
> Atis Lezdins wrote:
>
>
>> This seems nice way of sharing settings, however it wouldn't take over
>> calls in progress. For us, currently the greatest problem is that
>> whenever Asterisk crashes, calls are lost, and that means - lost
>> money. Are there any ideas?
>>
>
Atis Lezdins wrote:
> This seems nice way of sharing settings, however it wouldn't take over
> calls in progress. For us, currently the greatest problem is that
> whenever Asterisk crashes, calls are lost, and that means - lost
> money. Are there any ideas?
Perhaps investigate/diagnose the crache
A little off topic, but SipX has built in redudancy. if it is so
important to you, you should have a look.
On 9/25/07, Atis Lezdins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2007-August/195339.html
> > >> could provide you with some answers.
> > >
> >
[snip]
> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2007-August/195339.html
> >> could provide you with some answers.
> >
> >
> >Hi,
> >This seems nice way of sharing settings, however it wouldn't take over
> >calls in progress. For us, currently the greatest problem is that
> >whenever Aster
>- Original Message
>From: Atis Lezdins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>
>Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 2:11:10 PM
>Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
>
>On 9/25/07, Philipp Kempgen <[E
On 9/25/07, Philipp Kempgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adrian Marsh wrote:
>
> > I'm interested in how people are "clustering" Asterisk, if that's possible,
> > or how you might be achieving a redundant solution.
> > I've a single Asterisk server driving the company. Its well backed-up, and
>
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> I don't want to quote my text as not to spam the list (although
> it's all GPL). There's a nice countdown at
> http://www.amooma.de/gemeinschaft/
Very nice. I'll have to come back and take a closer look sometime.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Adrian Marsh wrote:
>
>> so maybe it's a case of looking at
>> Linux-HA.
>
> If I remember this correctly a normal ping is all Linux HA can
> do. It does not check whether Asterisk or other services are
> alive and respond to queries.
I think the basic Linux-HA setup wo
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:10 -0500, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> Nagios that's not redundancy.
>
And a brick isn't a house.
Clearly you know what Nagios is; and it's support for event-handlers.
If you had taken a moment to think, then you would know Nagios can form
part of a redundancy system.
Nagios that's not redundancy.
- Original Message
From: Dave Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 9:09:46 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at
Discussion
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 7:27:37 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 15:59 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> I haven't looked into it in any detail, but how about the standard Linux
> HA solution with a heartbeat monitor, a sha
Dave Walker wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 18:01 +0200, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
>> Adrian Marsh wrote:
>>
>>> so maybe it's a case of looking at
>>> Linux-HA.
>> If I remember this correctly a normal ping is all Linux HA can
>> do. It does not check whether Asterisk or other services are
>> alive a
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 18:01 +0200, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Adrian Marsh wrote:
>
> > so maybe it's a case of looking at
> > Linux-HA.
>
> If I remember this correctly a normal ping is all Linux HA can
> do. It does not check whether Asterisk or other services are
> alive and respond to queries.
Adrian Marsh wrote:
> so maybe it's a case of looking at
> Linux-HA.
If I remember this correctly a normal ping is all Linux HA can
do. It does not check whether Asterisk or other services are
alive and respond to queries.
Regards,
Philipp Kempgen
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwie
Adrian Marsh wrote:
> I'm interested in how people are "clustering" Asterisk, if that's possible,
> or how you might be achieving a redundant solution.
> I've a single Asterisk server driving the company. Its well backed-up, and
> I've a cloned machine that (in theory) with a DNS change could t
, so maybe it's a case of looking at
Linux-HA.
Adrian Marsh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jared
Smith
Sent: 25 September 2007 15:28
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Red
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 15:59 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> I haven't looked into it in any detail, but how about the standard Linux
> HA solution with a heartbeat monitor, a shared file-system and IP
> take-over?
It's been my experience that this usually works fairly well for
stateless protocols like
Adrian Marsh wrote:
> I'm interested in how people are "clustering" Asterisk, if that's
> possible, or how you might be achieving a redundant solution.
> I've a single Asterisk server driving the company. Its well
> backed-up, and I've a cloned machine that (in theory) with a DNS
> change could t
Hi All,
I'm interested in how people are "clustering" Asterisk, if that's possible, or
how you might be achieving a redundant solution.
I've a single Asterisk server driving the company. Its well backed-up, and
I've a cloned machine that (in theory) with a DNS change could take over
operations
On 4/17/06, Joseph Rothstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anyone using a PRI to Ethernet bridge, or any other kind of E1 GW thatwould allow failover to an alternate Asterisk box without manually switchingthe cable? This one is a litteexpensive(
http://www.mapleleaf-technologies.com/webstore/ethern
>I will tell you straight up that NFS mounted volumes will cause asterisk to
croak if it needs access to something that's not mounted. The first time
the >NFS share disappears for a moment, you're going to be restarting
services and losing time on the asterisk machines that need the mounts. It
wo
2006/4/17, Tim Panton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 2) You will fail. 100% uptime doesn't happen - ever - folks get close,
but every step costs exponentially more, and gets exponentially morecomplex - so much harder to maintain - so more fragile.To back Tim's reply, what happens if your "E1 failover
I'd like to start a discussion about Asterisk redundancy. I know this has
been covered in the past, but would like to get an idea of what people are
doing for a production system that must be up "all" the time.
I'm going to pipe in on this one. Asterisk redundancy is a huge
discussion on this li
On 17 Apr 2006, at 12:58, Joseph Rothstein wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion about Asterisk redundancy. I know
this has
been covered in the past, but would like to get an idea of what
people are
doing for a production system that must be up "all" the time.
Assuming a single E1 out.
He
As a matter of curiosity, does anyone know what the E1/T1 interface in
this (redfone) box is ?
Could the box be an embedded linux device with a PCI slot, running linux
and therefore zaptel, and therefore the PCI card could be a Digium or
sangoma card ...
Any clues ? Does anyone have such a b
I'd like to start a discussion about Asterisk redundancy. I know this has
been covered in the past, but would like to get an idea of what people are
doing for a production system that must be up "all" the time.
Assuming a single E1 out.
Here are some of my ideas.
HA Linux between the two asteris
Hello all,
i have configured asterisk server with two servers, (ultramonky load
balancer). 2 PSTN lines are comming to each server. if one server fails,
other can take over IP calls. its working fine.But if a customer calling to
a hunting line. if one sever fails PSTN calls cant be detected by th
Hi,
i have two [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.2 server. i want if one of my asterisk server down. other is taken control of my first server and call goes through.
Is it possible in asterisk.
Usman
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asteris
59 matches
Mail list logo
