Hi All,
In my extensions.conf I have : -
exten => _6XXX,1,Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${EXTEN})
exten => _6XXX,2,Playback(remote_unavail)
exten => _6XXX,3,Hangup
;
exten => _7XXX,1,Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${EXTEN})
exten => _7XXX,2,Playback(remote_unavail)
exten => _7XXX,3,Hangup
;
exten => _
Hello guys, I am here again, sorry for borring but I
in freeze here! : )
Just for resuming some doubts:
+ The extension.conf file:
has a [general] context for "general" configurations,
and a [global] context for global variables. The
another context [any_name] are context for "handle the
calls",
Has anyone ever seen Asterisk fail to parse files referenced by an
#include by a *.conf command?
e.g.:
#include /etc/asterisk/sip-phones.d/*.conf
Where the dir sip-phones.d contains sip extension conf files.
This worked fine for nearly a month and then mysteriously stopped
working for me last ni
upgrading from zaptel to dahdi, with a TDM400P:
Is /etc/dahdi/system.conf the same as /etc/zaptel.conf? As I read the
system.conf.sample, no echo canceller need be specified if there's a
hardware ec. Can I just rename zaptel.conf?
What about zapata.conf? Is this just renamed
/etc/asterisk/chan
Hi all,
Could someone please tell me what is the relative "cost" in using conf files
oppose to the astdb? Basically I need to match a name to a phone number in
order to have all users registered by name and not by number (which I
understood is not a good practice). I have 2000 users and a comple
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 09:35:12AM -0800, Robert Goodyear wrote:
> Has anyone ever seen Asterisk fail to parse files referenced by an
> #include by a *.conf command?
>
> e.g.:
>
> #include /etc/asterisk/sip-phones.d/*.conf
This does not work in current stable. IIRC it does work in current HEAD.
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 09:35:12AM -0800, Robert Goodyear wrote:
Has anyone ever seen Asterisk fail to parse files referenced by an
#include by a *.conf command?
e.g.:
Two options:
a. A number of versions have missed the inclusion of that patch. Lat
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:48:30PM +0200, Harel Cohen wrote:
> Hi all,
> Could someone please tell me what is the relative "cost" in using conf files
> oppose to the astdb? Basically I need to match a name to a phone number in
> order to have all users registered by name and not by number (which
