Thanks a lot Daryl!!
Yours,
Francis
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:25:21 +0930, Darryl Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Francis,
so no need to make a special dialplan to
acomodate the weird numbering system we have in Brazil (sometimes we
dial 7 numbers, sometimes 8, sometimes 12, sometimes 13,
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Darryl Ross wrote:
Oh, so I how does Asterisk knows when to start dialing out the
numbers, if there are no rules?
Have a look at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Extension+Matching
It doesn't actually tell the whole picture. There are two ways to handle
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Francis Augusto Medeiros wrote:
Actually, we also have non-fixed phone numbers in Germany. I think this is
not weird, I think this is very good. And again, Asterisk supports this.
Oh, so I how does Asterisk knows when to start dialing out the
numbers, if there are no
The other way is to hand off the call to the pstn as soon as you know
that is where it is headed and just pass the digits to the pstn after
that. This is called overlap dialing and is how most users are used
to the pstn working. This works for at least the zap channels.
It works also for
By call retrieval, I mean this: when the phone rings on an extension
(incoming call), but I'm far from it, then, dialing a certain prefix
would make me pick up that call from the extension that's nearby me.
That should work via dialplan. In bri-stuff-0.1.0-RC4 is app_pickup, a
channel
Hallo Holger, and thanks for your explanations! Here's my reply:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:51:54 +0200, Holger Schurig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'm not really looking for a lot of phone features, just the
basics (transfers, call retrieval, etc.).
Not sure what you mean with call
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:44:53 +0200, Holger Schurig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My concern was if I'd have to teach folks how to dial, but I guess
that I can still have the option to assign a number that will give
immediate access to the PSTN,
In Germany, you usually use a 0 in hardware PXSes
Hi Francis,
so no need to make a special dialplan to
acomodate the weird numbering system we have in Brazil (sometimes we
dial 7 numbers, sometimes 8, sometimes 12, sometimes 13, etc.)
Actually, we also have non-fixed phone numbers in Germany. I think this is
not weird, I think this is very good.
My concern was if I'd have to teach folks how to dial, but I guess
that I can still have the option to assign a number that will give
immediate access to the PSTN,
In Germany, you usually use a 0 in hardware PXSes to get the PSTN dial
tone. No problem with Asterisk to do the same.
so no
Well, I'm not really looking for a lot of phone features, just the
basics (transfers, call retrieval, etc.).
Not sure what you mean with call retrieval.
But the GS phone can only do blind transfer.
Also, Asterisk currently can only do blind-transfer by software.
If you want attended transfer
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Peter Svensson wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Francis Augusto Medeiros wrote:
I'll most likely use a BRI. Do you think this will help to avoid echo?
Using a BRI will eliminate echos from the pstn connection.
Not necessarily! When you call an analog phone via isdn, the
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:15:20 +0200 (CES), Tobias Jönsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Peter Svensson wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Francis Augusto Medeiros wrote:
I'll most likely use a BRI. Do you think this will help to avoid echo?
Using a BRI will eliminate echos from
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Francis Augusto Medeiros wrote:
Is this small delay annoying enough? Can it be perceived by the part
at the pstn side? Does it disturb fax signals, for example?
The echo described by Tobias (originating at the pstn connected user)
should only affect the isdn connected
Hi Francis,
Francis Augusto Medeiros wrote:
Hi there everyone!
I work at an office where we plant to have about 12-15 phone
extensions. Costs of PBX are cheaper, but they are not expandable and,
as the office is brand new, I want to use all modern stuff.
My question is: if I buy 12-15 Grandstream
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 13:03:49 -0300, Nicolas Gudino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Francis,
If you already have the analog telephone wiring in place, and you are on
a budget, I recomend you to use sipura spa-2000 adapters. They are a
whole lot better than GS phones. You can have 3way conferences
On Sunday 15 August 2004 12:03, Nicolas Gudino wrote:
If you already have the analog telephone wiring in place, and you are on
a budget, I recomend you to use sipura spa-2000 adapters. They are a
whole lot better than GS phones. You can have 3way conferences and
attendant transfers. With GS
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 13:39:10 -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why on earth would you install SPA-2000s and endure that wiring mess? An FXS
channel bank and a BIX strip will save you YEARS in lost time due to wiring
and general messiness!
Hello Andrew!
I'm sorry to ask this
On Sunday 15 August 2004 13:50, Francis Augusto Medeiros wrote:
I'm sorry to ask this really, reeally newbie thing, but...
what would be an FXS channel bank, and where would I find more info
about some popular models? And the same question goes to... BIX
strips! What are those?? :)
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 13:58:58 -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 15 August 2004 13:50, Francis Augusto Medeiros wrote:
I'm sorry to ask this really, reeally newbie thing, but...
what would be an FXS channel bank, and where would I find more info
about some
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Sunday 15 August 2004 12:03, Nicolas Gudino wrote:
If you already have the analog telephone wiring in place, and you are on
a budget, I recomend you to use sipura spa-2000 adapters. They are a
whole lot better than GS phones. You can have 3way conferences and
attendant
Hi there everyone!
I work at an office where we plant to have about 12-15 phone
extensions. Costs of PBX are cheaper, but they are not expandable and,
as the office is brand new, I want to use all modern stuff.
My question is: if I buy 12-15 Grandstream Budgetone 101 phones, and
install and
Asterisk should work fine for this application - but you and/or your
users may be expecting the Grandstreams to look/act like traditional
key system phones, where you've got a bunch of buttons labeled
Computer Room or Joe and Bob, or whatever, where you can press
that button to call that
,
Wiley
-Original Message-
From: Francis Augusto Medeiros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Help - is voip good for in-house calls?
Hi there everyone!
I work at an office where we plant to have about 12-15
Dear Greg,
Thanks a lot for your e-mail! Here are my comments:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:37:08 -0700, Greg Broiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asterisk should work fine for this application - but you and/or your
users may be expecting the Grandstreams to look/act like traditional
key system phones,
Hi there Wiley!
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:43:05 -0700, Wiley E. Siler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My office build is the same as yours. 15 or so extensions, low traffic
100MB network, and a desire to have a phone system that uses VoIP. I
have my system working as a PBX just like you would. I use
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Francis Augusto Medeiros wrote:
My concern was if I'd have to teach folks how to dial, but I guess
that I can still have the option to assign a number that will give
immediate access to the PSTN, so no need to make a special dialplan to
acomodate the weird numbering
Hello Francis,
I'll most likely use a BRI. Do you think this will help to avoid echo?
I could not say as I have never used a BRI and I am pretty new to this
too. I do know that BRI is supported from watching conversations in
this email list and reading online. People seem to use it a bit so
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Francis Augusto Medeiros wrote:
I'll most likely use a BRI. Do you think this will help to avoid echo?
Using a BRI will eliminate echos from the pstn connection. Your ip phones
should prevent echos from the local phone connections as well. That way
you should not cause any
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Wiley E. Siler wrote:
Greg had a great idea in having you set it up and try it. In fact, that
is exactly how I did mine. I purchase a cheap clone card for $15 and
used it to test on one POTS line while I tweaked my configuration files
and got the system validated. I
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 00:22:42 +0200 (CEST), Peter Svensson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Francis Augusto Medeiros wrote:
My concern was if I'd have to teach folks how to dial, but I guess
that I can still have the option to assign a number that will give
immediate access to
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 00:29:21 +0200 (CEST), Peter Svensson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Francis Augusto Medeiros wrote:
I'll most likely use a BRI. Do you think this will help to avoid echo?
Using a BRI will eliminate echos from the pstn connection. Your ip phones
should
On Saturday 14 August 2004 18:29, Peter Svensson wrote:
Using a BRI will eliminate echos from the pstn connection. Your ip phones
should prevent echos from the local phone connections as well. That way
you should not cause any noticable echo for the remote party. Being all
digital has its
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Saturday 14 August 2004 18:29, Peter Svensson wrote:
Using a BRI will eliminate echos from the pstn connection. Your ip phones
should prevent echos from the local phone connections as well. That way
you should not cause any noticable echo for
: [Asterisk-Users] Help - is voip good for in-house calls?
Also, my HP switch has COS (class of service which is like
QOS) so I can prioritize the packets coming from my phones
over the standard network traffic. Even without this
switching feature turned on, performance was great
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Jay Milk wrote:
QOS comes into play only when you have to route the voice-traffic over a
WAN connection and it has to compete with data going over the same link.
If you have a T1 coming into the office and place a VOIP call, then
someone downloading a huge file needs to
35 matches
Mail list logo
