[Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP

2003-09-19 Thread Peter Zeltins
I wonder how IAX compares to SIP bandwidth-wise? I've tried both over overseas IP connection, and somehow SIP seemed to work better. Peter ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP

2008-09-07 Thread Edgar Guadamuz
Hello, I have been testing a trunk IAX and another SIP, using sipp to generate SIP calls to a Asterisk box. The testing dialplan just connects to another Asterisk box, who answers the call and playback some files. I noticed that the cpu load is higher when I use an IAX, about 90% for 25 simulta

[asterisk-users] iax vs. sip?

2006-08-30 Thread BerkHolz, Steven
I have no NAT issues.  My PBX is multihomed and the outside IP is locked down for all except IAX and SIP ports.   With the current version of asterisk, which transport is better right now?   I am looking at 6-10 simultaneous calls over a half T1.   I am not asking about codecs here, I am as

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP

2003-09-19 Thread WipeOut .
> I wonder how IAX compares to SIP bandwidth-wise? I've tried both over > overseas IP connection, and somehow SIP seemed to work better. > > Peter > Then try making two or three or more calls at the same time.. :) If you setup IAX in trunk mode it uses the same connection for multiple voice str

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP

2003-09-19 Thread PJ Welsh
Does this thread help? http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-June/014788.html On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:18:53PM -0500, Peter Zeltins wrote: > I wonder how IAX compares to SIP bandwidth-wise? I've tried both over > overseas IP connection, and somehow SIP seemed to work better. >

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP

2003-09-19 Thread James Golovich
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, WipeOut . wrote: > > I wonder how IAX compares to SIP bandwidth-wise? I've tried both over > > overseas IP connection, and somehow SIP seemed to work better. > > > > Peter > > > > Then try making two or three or more calls at the same time.. :) > > If you setup IAX in tr

RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP

2003-09-19 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
How do you set up IAX in Trunk mode? Uriel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of WipeOut . Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP > I wonder how IAX compares to SIP bandwidth-w

RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP

2003-09-20 Thread WipeOut .
> How do you set up IAX in Trunk mode? > Uriel > Add "trunk=yes" to your definition in iax.conf.. Later -- __ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze ___

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP

2003-09-20 Thread WipeOut .
> > FYI: trunking only works in IAX2 and it requires you to have a zaptel > interface on both endpoints > I have heard that but in my setup I only have Zaptel hardware on one side and trunking appears to work fine.. Initially I tried using ztdummy on the side which didn't have zaptel hardware

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP

2003-09-20 Thread Jan Janak
Hello, On 19-09 19:48, WipeOut . wrote: > Also IAX does not care about NAT so a situation like.. > AST<-->NAT<-->Internet<-->NAT<-->AST > ..will work fine.. SIP will have problems in a setup like this without the use of > specialised NAT routers.. I am wondering how setup like this could work w

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP

2003-09-20 Thread WipeOut .
> > I am wondering how setup like this could work with IAX (or any other > protocol) when symmetric NATs are used. > > If you have two different NATs then direct connection is not possible > between hosts behind those two NATs. You have to do some kind of > provisioning of the NAT boxes (i.e

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP

2003-09-21 Thread Peter Zeltins
> Does this thread help? > > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-June/014788.html > Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for. I tried experimenting with different codecs myself, and GSM seems to be the only one that works... neither iLBC or Speex went thru. I'm using XLite

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP

2003-09-21 Thread WipeOut .
> Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for. I tried experimenting with > different codecs myself, and GSM seems to be the only one that works... > neither iLBC or Speex went thru. I'm using XLite v1.x & Asterisk 0.5.0, > wonder if it's a softphone's problem? > I have got X-Lite to work with

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP

2008-09-08 Thread Tim Panton
On 7 Sep 2008, at 21:34, Edgar Guadamuz wrote: > Hello, > > I have been testing a trunk IAX and another SIP, using sipp to > generate SIP calls to a Asterisk box. > > > The testing dialplan just connects to another Asterisk box, who > answers the call and playback some files. > > I noticed that t

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP

2008-09-14 Thread Edgar Guadamuz
Hi, Just to review the test I did: ---SIP extension-- Trunk - | SIPp |<--->| Asterisk 1 |<>| Asterisk 2 | ------ -- Both Asterisk b

Re: [asterisk-users] iax vs. sip?

2006-08-30 Thread Tom
We used iax for more than a year and moved to sip about 6 months ago. The quality from termination providers seems much better now with sip. Tom At 09:38 PM 8/30/2006, you wrote: Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_=_NextPart_

Re: [asterisk-users] iax vs. sip?

2006-08-31 Thread Simon Woodhead
Hi Steven,The provider's implementation will have a bigger affect than any differences within Asterisk, e.g. how they are load-balancing and whether in fact SIP is serviced by Asterisk at all. Compared like-for-like within Asterisk we find there is not a lot in it, with each having their own pros a

Re: [asterisk-users] iax vs. sip?

2006-08-31 Thread Rich Adamson
We've been using iax with teliax.com for a couple of years, and it seems the quality of calls varies with time. Sometimes it is good and next time its not so good. There has been changes occurring to iax and the jitterbuffer stuff over the last two years, and I'm reasonably certain that some po

[Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP (music on hold)

2005-03-29 Thread dbakkerlist
Does IAX support music on hold? It seems only my SIP phones do. Is this correct? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lis

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP (music on hold)

2005-03-29 Thread Caleb
I hope I didnt get your question wrong, but if you are asking whether Asterisk can play MOH to an IAX client, then the answer is yes. We have a couple of IAX clients connecting into the queue and are being played MOH while waiting for an operations. Hope this helps :) Cheers On Tue, 29 Mar 2005

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX vs SIP (music on hold)

2005-03-29 Thread Sean Kennedy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does IAX support music on hold? It seems only my SIP phones do. Is this correct? As I understand it, once the call is delivered to asterisk, it becomes abstracted into a channel. And you can do anything to one channel that you can do to other channels ( with a few nota

[asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP trunks between Asterisk boxes

2007-01-04 Thread Damon Estep
In order to work around some authentication issues I am considering connecting two asterisk boxes with IAX instead of SIP. The original reason for choosing SIP was to reduce the need to translate SIP signaling to IAX, since all origination, termination, and UAs are SIP. Can anyone comment on th

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP trunks between Asterisk boxes

2007-01-04 Thread Noah Miller
Hi Damon - Can anyone comment on the overhead added when a SIP call comes into one asterisk box, is routed to another with IAX instead of SIP, and is then sent to the UA from the second box with SIP? DTMF passthrough issues? I've got a client with sip phones on several different servers and I

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP trunks between Asterisk boxes

2007-01-05 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Noah Miller wrote: Hi Damon - Can anyone comment on the overhead added when a SIP call comes into one asterisk box, is routed to another with IAX instead of SIP, and is then sent to the UA from the second box with SIP? DTMF passthrough issues? I've got a client with si

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP trunks between Asterisk boxes

2007-01-06 Thread Brad Templeton
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:33:02AM +, Gordon Henderson wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Noah Miller wrote: > > >Hi Damon - > > > >>Can anyone comment on the overhead added when a SIP call comes into one > >>asterisk box, is routed to another with IAX instead of SIP, and is then > >>sent > >>to th

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP trunks between Asterisk boxes

2007-01-07 Thread Thomas Kenyon
Brad Templeton wrote: For SIP phone calling * box, relay to other * box and out to SIP phone, you definitely want SIP all the way. Unless bandwidth between the * servers is a concern, then you're better off keeping the link between servers as IAX. (preferably trunked) It is worth rememberin

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP trunks between Asterisk boxes

2007-01-07 Thread David Thomas
Unless bandwidth between the * servers is a concern, then you're better off keeping the link between servers as IAX. (preferably trunked) As I understand it video will NOT work if you use an IAX trunk between * boxes, it must be SIP. Just food for thought in case you are planning on using video.

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP trunks between Asterisk boxes

2007-01-07 Thread Brad Templeton
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 04:12:27PM +, Thomas Kenyon wrote: > Brad Templeton wrote: > > > > >For SIP phone calling * box, relay to other * box and out to SIP > >phone, you definitely want SIP all the way. > > > Unless bandwidth between the * servers is a concern, then you're better > off keepi

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP trunks between Asterisk boxes

2007-01-10 Thread Thomas Kenyon
Brad Templeton wrote: On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 04:12:27PM +, Thomas Kenyon wrote: Brad Templeton wrote: For SIP phone calling * box, relay to other * box and out to SIP phone, you definitely want SIP all the way. Unless bandwidth between the * servers is a concern, then you're better off

[asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP - Getting Asterisk out of the media path

2007-02-16 Thread Hugo Livude
If a call comes into my Asterisk server on a DiD provided by an ITSP and the dialplan sends that call to another external number throught the same ITSP's network, I don't want the RTP packets to pass through my server once the call is bridged. I have had great success getting this to work using IA