PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "rnc Info Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IBM to Run VoIP On Linux
>
> >
> > I think it is time to start commercial
>
> I think it is time to start commercial Pro version (not expensive !!!) of
> Asterisk.
> In my company we already made decision to do it, to offer people
> ready-to-go solution. But is is hard to do anykind of such product without
> Digium and Mark's support.
> Mark I think you are very overl
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 21:59:43 +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>> Take a look at iaxclient.sourceforge.net
>>
>> The current CVS version supports IAX or IAX2, and works on Win32,
>> ia386Linux and
>> Macs.
>>
>> There are also a few working crossplatform softphones there.
>
I actually meant "on IRC". I had forgotten about my .sig, LOL! Thanks
for pointing it out.
--Eric
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 14:59, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> > I've stopped referring people
> > directly to my Asterisk site and instead refer them to the Unofficial
> > Links page at Digium.
> >
>
> I've stopped referring people
directly to my Asterisk site and instead refer them to the Unofficial
Links page at Digium.
--Eric
--
Sample configs, scripts, more : http://www.fnords.org/~eric/asterisk/
;-)
/O
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL P
Take a look at iaxclient.sourceforge.net
The current CVS version supports IAX or IAX2, and works on Win32,
ia386Linux and
Macs.
There are also a few working crossplatform softphones there.
...and iaxclient is probably not one of them. Working softphones for me
includes stability, intuitive use
As we know market has thousands of great free source products, but somehow
most of companies are buying commercial software and paying a lot of $$$ .
Question becomes why they need to pay so much money for something what can
be taken for free ? Also, why all these software products are so expensi
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 09:20, Rich Adamson wrote:
> John Todd's sample config's have been a good first step for newbies, but
> the average newbie doesn't have clue where to find them (as one example
> only) until after burning up the list with questions. After internalizing
> those configs and the
> Asterisk has got to be about the best kept secret in telephony. I've seen
numerous articles on slashdot about VoIP, even in relation to Linux and
only *once* has the post even mentioned Asterisk. Am I missing something,
or is Asterisk clearly a good potential player in any kind of linux-bas
> Asterisk has got to be about the best kept secret in telephony. I've seen
> numerous articles on slashdot about VoIP, even in relation to Linux and
> only *once* has the post even mentioned Asterisk. Am I missing something,
> or is Asterisk clearly a good potential player in any kind of linux-b
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 23:50:06 -0800, "Darren Martz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If I'm out of place in the following suggestions, I'm sure others will tell
>me
>
>- Create a "clean" SDK of the wonderful IAX2 protocol for Win32 and Mac to
>gain exposure everywhere
>- Push, entice, bribe IP phone des
Engineers of all kinds can be a bit lax about documentation. However,
the documentation police are rightly held in a regard usually reserved
for lawyers, realtors, used car salesmen and serial killers.
There isn't a single thing to stop anyone that really loves
documentation actually producing
Hi!
> 1) No >1.0 release. In fact, no release structure at all really.
> (Hold your flames: I know this is to be remedied soon, along with
> backtrack patches for security/stability.)
With that comes a "changelog" and some basic documentation. I still find
it amazing that "coders" are permitt
Can I add to this and say that another thing that could be hindering the
takup is "Single System" VoIP scalability and a certain amout of
"Enterprise" flexibility..
Let me explain those two..
Before you start reading these and thinking "This guy is mad!!" let me
just say that I love Asterisk a
Besides you got list four times since May!
http://slashdot.org/search.pl?query=asterisk
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Asterisk would need scalability and redundancy on the voip side to
play in the soft-switch area. The biggest issue stopping Asterisk having
redundancy and scalability using sip is the inability to work with just
about any sip device without "canreinvite" turn off. If Asterisk could
handled rei
m: "Mark Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IBM to Run VoIP On Linux
Asterisk has got to be about the best kept secret in telephony. I've seen
numerous
Yes, it is a well-kept secret, which is a shame since it obviously
fits so many different requirements. Here are some late-night
musings as to why new users coming to Asterisk is only a stream when
it should be a river:
1) No >1.0 release. In fact, no release structure at all really.
(Hold y
Asterisk has got to be about the best kept secret in telephony. I've seen
numerous articles on slashdot about VoIP, even in relation to Linux and
only *once* has the post even mentioned Asterisk. Am I missing something,
or is Asterisk clearly a good potential player in any kind of linux-based
sof
For those who don't wake up at 5.00 am and start reading /.
http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid7_gci935769,00.html
--
Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digiu
20 matches
Mail list logo
