http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-March/008088.html
why is there such a delay in getting ipv6 rolled out when it solves all these
problems ?
===
There are many reasons...
1. Leasing Address Space from the I* society (small s...aka the Big Lie Society) is
not desirable by all
At 05:45 PM 3/5/2003 -0600, you wrote:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-March/008088.html
why is there such a delay in getting ipv6 rolled out when it solves all
these problems ?
===
There are many reasons...
1. Leasing Address Space from the I* society (small s...aka the Big
At 06:08 PM 3/5/2003 -0600, you wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:45:13PM -0600, Jim Fleming wrote:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-March/008088.html
why is there such a delay in getting ipv6 rolled out when it solves
all these problems ?
I doubt that users will stop
- Original Message -
From: Jon Pounder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...Asterisk is a natural extension of the NAT transition/evolution and
helps to negate any need for IPv6...
I think all the extra layered on crap for NAT and the hacks to make a few
static ips last longer in a world that
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-March/008088.html
Jon Pounder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wed, 05 Mar 2003 17:28:20 -0500
why is there such a delay in getting ipv6 rolled out when it solves all these
problems ?
I doubt that users will stop using NAT until ISPs stop charging
Jon Pounder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At 06:08 PM 3/5/2003 -0600, you wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:45:13PM -0600, Jim Fleming wrote:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-March/008088.html
why is there such a delay in getting ipv6 rolled out when it solves
all these
At 08:30 PM 3/5/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Jon Pounder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At 06:08 PM 3/5/2003 -0600, you wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:45:13PM -0600, Jim Fleming wrote:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-March/008088.html
why is there such a delay in getting ipv6
