[asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy

2014-07-09 Thread Justin Killen
I have two servers, each connected to the PTSN via PRI. When I call from site A (951-999-) to site B (555-1212) and the phone at site B is on the phone, I hear the normal ring tone for about 20 seconds, then the message all circuits are busy now. please try your call again latter followed

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy

2014-07-09 Thread Eric Wieling
09, 2014 2:24 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy I have two servers, each connected to the PTSN via PRI. When I call from site A (951-999-) to site B (555-1212) and the phone at site B is on the phone, I

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy

2014-07-09 Thread Justin Killen
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:35 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy

2014-07-09 Thread Justin Killen
...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 11:00 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy I tried changing the dialplan to use Hangup(17

[asterisk-users] Why **CONGESTION** not *****NOANSWER****** ?

2011-12-21 Thread virendra bhati
Hi List, I have a DID number which is routed to my production server. Problem is that when I dial that DID number from my production number then it's gives DIALSTATUS to CONGESTION if I don't pick the calls. As per the asterisk it should reply NO ANSWER. *extensions.conf *:- exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] Why **CONGESTION** not *****NOANSWER****** ?

2011-12-21 Thread Eric Wieling
-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of virendra bhati Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 6:48 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; Sam Govind Subject: [asterisk-users] Why **CONGESTION** not *NOANSWER** ? Hi List, I have a DID number which is routed to my

Re: [asterisk-users] Why **CONGESTION** not *****NOANSWER****** ?

2011-12-21 Thread virendra bhati
, December 21, 2011 6:48 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; Sam Govind Subject: [asterisk-users] Why **CONGESTION** not *NOANSWER** ? Hi List, I have a DID number which is routed to my production server. Problem is that when I dial that DID number from my

[asterisk-users] Adding Congestion to CDR logs

2010-06-30 Thread Kenny Watson
Hi, I had a breif telco outage with one of my sip providers. Is there a way to add failed calls to the cdr aswell as the connected ones? I was also thinking about having an automated process that monitored congested calls vs Succesful ones on a carrier and weight the dial plan using

Re: [asterisk-users] Adding Congestion to CDR logs

2010-06-30 Thread Gareth Blades
Kenny Watson wrote: Hi, I had a breif telco outage with one of my sip providers. Is there a way to add failed calls to the cdr aswell as the connected ones? I was also thinking about having an automated process that monitored congested calls vs Succesful ones on a carrier and

Re: [asterisk-users] Adding Congestion to CDR logs

2010-06-30 Thread Kenny Watson
Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, 30 June, 2010 11:44:58 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Adding Congestion to CDR logs Kenny Watson wrote: Hi, I had a breif telco outage with one of my sip providers. Is there a way to add failed calls to the cdr aswell

Re: [asterisk-users] Adding Congestion to CDR logs

2010-06-30 Thread Gareth Blades
list-aster...@skycomuk.com To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, 30 June, 2010 11:44:58 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Adding Congestion to CDR logs Kenny Watson wrote: Hi, I had a breif telco outage with one of my

Re: [asterisk-users] Adding Congestion to CDR logs

2010-06-30 Thread Kenny Watson
Blades list-aster...@skycomuk.com To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, 30 June, 2010 12:14:29 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Adding Congestion to CDR logs Using standard AGI will add a fair bit of load and most

[asterisk-users] DAHDI Congestion cause 34

2010-04-25 Thread Chris Datfung
Hi, I'm running Asterisk SVN-trunk-r226890 and whenever I restart asterisk and try to make a call I get the following error message: -- Executing [6781...@default:1] Dial(IAX2/iaxy-7477, DAHDI/g1/96781948)

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI Congestion cause 34

2010-04-25 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 08:37:22PM +0300, Chris Datfung wrote: Hi, I'm running Asterisk SVN-trunk-r226890 and whenever I restart asterisk and try to make a call I get the following error message: --

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI Congestion cause 34

2010-04-25 Thread Chris Datfung
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.comwrote: On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 08:37:22PM +0300, Chris Datfung wrote: Hi, I'm running Asterisk SVN-trunk-r226890 and whenever I restart asterisk and try to make a call I get the following error message:

[asterisk-users] Dahdi Congestion status

2010-02-21 Thread Benoit
Hi, I'm using an half T1 line on a asterisk (obviously :)) 1.6.2.4 system, up to recently everything was fine but we are starting to experience the call limitation of the line (15). So as to warn user of the problem i attached a vocal notification to the CONGESTION status after a Dial(), but it

Re: [asterisk-users] Understanding Congestion to incoming caller

2009-11-17 Thread Michelle Dupuis
To: Asterisk Users List Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Understanding Congestion to incoming caller 2009/11/17 Michelle Dupuis supp...@ocg.ca I have an * installation which will refuse incoming callers once a max (5 callers) is reached. Caller 6 and up should be notified of congestion...without

[asterisk-users] Understanding Congestion to incoming caller

2009-11-16 Thread Michelle Dupuis
I have an * installation which will refuse incoming callers once a max (5 callers) is reached. Caller 6 and up should be notified of congestion...without network load on my trunk. How would I do this? The voipinfo wiki shows playing a congestion tone to the caller, but that seems stupid since

Re: [asterisk-users] Understanding Congestion to incoming caller

2009-11-16 Thread Olivier
2009/11/17 Michelle Dupuis supp...@ocg.ca I have an * installation which will refuse incoming callers once a max (5 callers) is reached. Caller 6 and up should be notified of congestion...without network load on my trunk. On which tech, does this trunk rely ? Is it a SIP trunk ? How

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem

2009-09-28 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Just to answer your side issue: On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 04:05:30PM -0500, Andy Howell wrote: The only Warning or Error I see is when asterisk first starts a new call. logger.c: -- Starting simple switch on 'DAHDI/1-1' [Sep 27 15:55:50] WARNING[4199] chan_dahdi.c: Unable to enable echo

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem

2009-09-28 Thread Ismael Ruiz
Hi! I had the same problem... dahdi_transcode command solved the problem! CheerS! Ismael. On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.comwrote: Just to answer your side issue: On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 04:05:30PM -0500, Andy Howell wrote: The only Warning or Error

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem

2009-09-28 Thread Landy Landy
...@xorcom.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Monday, September 28, 2009, 2:25 AM Just to answer your side issue: On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 04:05:30PM -0500, Andy Howell wrote: The only Warning or Error I see is when asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem

2009-09-28 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 04:56:01AM -0700, Landy Landy wrote: I have a similar problem with DAHDI. If my server gets rebooted, I can't make any calls until the a call come in from outside. From there I can answer the call and DAHDI works fine afterwards. In your case: is the problem reset by

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem

2009-09-28 Thread Landy Landy
In your case: is the problem reset by restarting asterisk? 'dahdi resstart'? The problem does not reset by restarting asterisk. I've noticed that I can call other sip phones but, when trying to call out, I get the same (Busy/Congested/Not-Available) congested messege.

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem

2009-09-28 Thread Barry Miller
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 02:26:29PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 04:56:01AM -0700, Landy Landy wrote: I have a similar problem with DAHDI. If my server gets rebooted, I can't make any calls until the a call come in from outside. From there I can answer the call and

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem

2009-09-28 Thread Danny Nicholas
: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 02:26:29PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 04:56:01AM -0700, Landy Landy wrote: I have a similar problem with DAHDI. If my server gets rebooted, I can't make any calls until the a call come in from outside

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem

2009-09-28 Thread Shaun Ruffell
On 09/28/2009 01:06 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: Funny. The first thing I always do after a reboot is call in from my cell to make sure things work. But last night I rebooted and immediately tried dialing out (with a TDM842B) and got: WARNING[2720]: app_dial.c:1721 dial_exec_full: Unable to

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem

2009-09-28 Thread Barry Miller
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 04:09:43PM -0500, Shaun Ruffell wrote: On 09/28/2009 01:06 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: Funny. The first thing I always do after a reboot is call in from my cell to make sure things work. But last night I rebooted and immediately tried dialing out (with a TDM842B) and

[asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem

2009-09-27 Thread Andy Howell
I am unable to dial out over a Wildcard TDM400P. This was working previously, so must have messed up the config somehow. I'm running Asterisk 1.6.0.15, with FreePBX 2.5.2.2. When I dial, I see: -- Executing [...@macro-dialout-trunk:19] Dial(DAHDI/1-1, DAHDI/g0/9239220,300,) in new stack

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI congestion problem

2009-09-27 Thread Andy Howell
Andy Howell wrote: I am unable to dial out over a Wildcard TDM400P. This was working previously, so must have messed up the config somehow. I'm running Asterisk 1.6.0.15, with FreePBX 2.5.2.2. When I dial, I see: -- Executing [...@macro-dialout-trunk:19] Dial(DAHDI/1-1,

[asterisk-users] Busy (congestion) signal and cell phones

2008-04-16 Thread Mark Gimelfarb
Hello, all! I've noticed a peculiar situation and I am hoping someone can shed some light on it for me. We have an Asterisk (1.4.18 ) box talking to the world via Zaptel on a PRI from a telco (USA). I have an extension that returns busy signal (fast-busy or regular busy) (using US tones).

Re: [asterisk-users] Busy (congestion) signal and cell phones

2008-04-16 Thread Godwin Stewart
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:40:42 -0500, Mark Gimelfarb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why do cell phones and Gizmo both detect busy tones and terminate the call? Is that a standard behavior? It *is* standard procedure for a cellphone to terminate a call immediately it discovers that the called number

Re: [asterisk-users] Busy (congestion) signal and cell phones

2008-04-16 Thread Eric Wieling
What country are you in?? Yes, it is common for cell phones to disconnect the call if they receive CONGESTION, but not BUSY. Horwich IT Services (Godwin Stewart) wrote: It *is* standard procedure for a cellphone to terminate a call immediately it discovers that the called number is busy. It

[asterisk-users] Busy (congestion) signal and cell phones

2008-04-16 Thread Mark Gimelfarb
I'm in the US, so I was originally using the US tones. Looks like I'm getting a disconnect with both CONGESTION and BUSY. In fact, I wasn't actually using Congestion() and Busy(), I just did Playtones() for both of those. There is no reason to send PRI messages to cell phones, is there? The

[asterisk-users] busy/congestion random

2008-01-15 Thread Sasa
Hi, I use: Trixbox-2.2.4 FreePBX-2.3.1.0 Asterisk-1.2.17 BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1y-e Zaptel-1.2.19 ..with two ISDN cards, often but occasionally the dial out failed but is possible to receive external call. My zapata.conf conf is: [trunkgroups] [channels] language=it context=from-pstn

[asterisk-users] IAX2 - Congestion

2007-03-14 Thread Mario Mayerle Filho
Hy all! Your Asterisk server is return this log : *CLI -- Executing Dial(Khomp/B0C0, IAX2/*.*.*.*/9834|30|r) in new stack -- Called *.*.*.*/9834 Mar 14 15:35:40 NOTICE[4212]: chan_iax2.c:2836 auto_congest: Auto-congesting call due to slow response -- IAX2/*.*.*.*:4569-1 is

[asterisk-users] Auto Congestion

2006-08-23 Thread David Brazier
Were getting messages auto_congest: Auto-congesting . I cant find much information about what this means, and Ive had a look at the source code but that didnt help me much. Could anyone point me to a description of auto congestion? Thanks David

Re: [Asterisk-Users] No congestion

2006-01-21 Thread Moises Silva
check incominglimit and outgoinglimit in sip.conf http://www.voip-info.org On 1/20/06, Kristian Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey! I'm having a small problem. I'm using Realtime to store SIP account information. Dialing works just fine, but when dialing a person already on the phone I

[Asterisk-Users] No congestion

2006-01-20 Thread Kristian Larsson
Hey! I'm having a small problem. I'm using Realtime to store SIP account information. Dialing works just fine, but when dialing a person already on the phone I don't get a busy tone. Eg, Phone 100 calls 200 and they chat with each other phone 150 calls 100, and gets a regular ringing tone what I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Congestion problem

2005-12-30 Thread Brian Capouch
Tomislav Parcina wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... When somebody calls me on fxo4 port * sents that call to SIP 214 phone. The problem is that when call ends and SIP user hangs up, the line stays up. Now I don't use Congestion any more. Can sombody tell me do I

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Congestion problem

2005-12-29 Thread Tomislav Parcina
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... When somebody calls me on fxo4 port * sents that call to SIP 214 phone. The problem is that when call ends and SIP user hangs up, the line stays up. Now I don't use Congestion any more. Can sombody tell me do I realy need that

[Asterisk-Users] Does congestion exit on a different priority?

2005-01-04 Thread Paul Rodan
Customer is having problems with his internet connection, I have in my context: [jimballboutiques] exten = 1235690251,1,SetGroup(customer) exten = 1235690251,2,CheckGroup(3) exten = 1235690251,3,Dial(SIP/jimball,20,r) exten = 1235690251,4,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED]) exten =