Re: [Asterisk-Users] Performance differences 64-bit vs 32-bit

2006-02-08 Thread Richard Scobie
Morgan Gilroy wrote: As far as I know there will be no difference. 32bit runs natively on AMD64 chips. The only advantage of 64bit is the extra address space and huge integers :) But I could be wrong, iv not done any benchmarking myself just what i have read on the net. I have no idea if As

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Performance differences 64-bit vs 32-bit

2006-02-08 Thread stoffell
On 2/8/06, Morgan Gilroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As far as I know there will be no difference. > 32bit runs natively on AMD64 chips. > The only advantage of 64bit is the extra address space and huge integers I agree, but.. I have recently installed debian with an em64t kernel (it was a Xeon 3

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Performance differences 64-bit vs 32-bit

2006-02-08 Thread Morgan Gilroy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Austin Denyer > Sent: 08 February 2006 14:11 > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Performance differences 64-bit vs 32-bit > > > Hi Guys. > > We've got

[Asterisk-Users] Performance differences 64-bit vs 32-bit

2006-02-08 Thread Austin Denyer
Hi Guys. We've got a new server that we're looking to use for an Asterisk install. The CPU is a 64-bit AMD Opteron 246, 2Gb RAM. We're having some compilation issues with some of the Asterisk modules using Debian-amd64, and due to time constraints we are considering going 32-bit for now just to