In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:
> > But the patches aren't a derived work. That is the value they have here.
> > There are an independant adjunct work.
>
> According to most lawyers a patch _is_ a derived work
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> IANAL, but those chapters would be yours. Adding them to Gone With the Wind
> and distributing the resultant "new" book would be considered distributing a
> derived work and fall into the gray area.
>
> It's the same as fanfic; the characters and
On Saturday 25 September 2004 06:03, Peter Svensson wrote:
> As an example, if I were to write a few more chapters to "Gone With the
> Wind" those would be a derived work and, in countries signatories to one
> of the two copyright treaties, the property of the original copyright
> holders.
IANAL,
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:
> >>>But the patches aren't a derived work. That is the value they have here.
> >>>There are an independant adjunct work.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>According to most lawyers a patch _is_ a derived work in nearly all
> >>circumstances. E.g. a novel based on t
Michael Bielicki wrote:
find someone to host it in India or serbia and you can safely ignore it :)
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:22:52 +0200 (CEST), Peter Svensson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:
I am not a lawyer,
find someone to host it in India or serbia and you can safely ignore it :)
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:22:52 +0200 (CEST), Peter Svensson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:
>
> > >On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:
> > >I am not a lawyer, nor even a US c
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:
> >On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:
> >I am not a lawyer, nor even a US citizen. Talking to someone who is both
> >may be a good idea.
> >
> >
> What is the relevance of being a US citizen? Copyright rules are largely
> global.
There are
pers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 1:10 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Free G.729 ready for download
> I expropriated the right to rip Daniel's disclamer for use in my
> email too..
>
> D
Peter Svensson wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:
I wouldn't do that, if I were you. Distributing the source code for
educational and evaluation purposes won't get anyone into trouble with
the patent issues. I think (not sure) that Intel's copyright on the code
is OK, since Da
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:
> I wouldn't do that, if I were you. Distributing the source code for
> educational and evaluation purposes won't get anyone into trouble with
> the patent issues. I think (not sure) that Intel's copyright on the code
> is OK, since Daniel is distribu
Arkadi Shishlov wrote:
I expropriated the right to rip Daniel's disclamer for use in my
email too..
DISCLAIMER:
You might have to pay royalty fees to the G.729 patent holders for using
their algorithm.
For easier testing I prepared codec_g729.so binaries and associated
libraries and put them on the
I expropriated the right to rip Daniel's disclamer for use in my
email too..
DISCLAIMER:
You might have to pay royalty fees to the G.729 patent holders for using
their algorithm.
For easier testing I prepared codec_g729.so binaries and associated
libraries and put them on the web:
http://kvin.lv/
12 matches
Mail list logo
