On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Lee wrote:
> So my question remains: Is PCI 2.2 a requirement to use the TDM400P
> card? If so, where is this specified? If not, is there a performance
> difference when using PCI 2.1?
PCI 2.2 is mostly a clerification on the 2.1 specification. One difference
that may be imp
Just adding my 2 cents..
I have used PCI cards before that say PCI 2.2 on them (not specifying
whether it is a requirement) on machines that don't support it (old
old). The cards functioned perfectly in all cases.
Note: These were not digium cards.
Regards,
Kimble Young
Lee wrote:
The Digium web
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Cook
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 8:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: How to test if PCI 2.2?
--snip--
>When I cat /var/log/dmesg | grep PCI, I get this:
>PCI: PC
The Digium web site says that the card is "PCI 2.2 Compliant," which
to me says that the card *supports* that standard, not that PCI 2.2 is
*required*.
The data sheet states In "Hardware and Software Requirements":
"Available PCI Slot" Now, call me crazy, but that doesn't pretty much
means any PCI
When I cat /var/log/dmesg | grep PCI, I get this:
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfc7ce, last bus=1
PCI: Using configuration type 1
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
PCI: Discovered primary peer bus 01 [IRQ]
PCI: Using IRQ router ServerWorks [1166/0200] at 00:0f.0
Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-0
