ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 1/23/2006 10:49 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Polycom FW
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> We c
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> We conducted focus groups, looking at several different vendors, before
> we decided to go with the Polycom. From the user interface perspective,
> the Polycom's won hands down. I was never involved with it, but
> apparently to configure the Cisco's
Thread hijack - grr!
On 23-Jan-06, at 7:37 AM, Brian Capouch wrote:
Doug Lytle wrote:
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
>
>> We conducted focus groups, looking at several different vendors,
>> before we decided to go with the Polycom. From the user interface
>> perspective, the Polycom's won ha
Doug Lytle wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
We conducted focus groups, looking at several different vendors,
before we decided to go with the Polycom. From the user interface
perspective, the Polycom's won hands down. I was never involved with
it, but apparently to configure the Cisco's you nee
Douglas Garstang wrote:
We conducted focus groups, looking at several different vendors, before we
decided to go with the Polycom. From the user interface perspective, the
Polycom's won hands down. I was never involved with it, but apparently to
configure the Cisco's you need to be converting
hex??? Yuk!
-Original Message-
From: Wilson Pickett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 6:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Polycom FW
> I don't think you can beat the Polycom's for design, features, c
> I don't think you can beat the Polycom's for design, features, configuration
> options and functionality tho. :)
Polycoms (I only have experience with a ip500) have many qualities.
However, I think it's only a matter of time before entries at the
$180-$200 price point begin beating it in many w
On 1/23/06, Doug Lytle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Further, Polycom SIP phones have the longest boot time of any phone
> > I've ever seen (something like 5 min, compared to a Sipure, less than
>
> Give a SIP based Cisco 79XX phone a try, just about as long in boot time.
Huh? My 7905 takes well
Wilson Pickett wrote:
Further, Polycom SIP phones have the longest boot time of any phone
I've ever seen (something like 5 min, compared to a Sipure, less than
Give a SIP based Cisco 79XX phone a try, just about as long in boot time.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
"Those who would give up Es
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Polycom FW
> I second your opinion that Polycom needs to change their policy on
this.
> "Strengthening the Reseller Channels" is one of the more nonsensical
> I second your opinion that Polycom needs to change their policy on this.
> "Strengthening the Reseller Channels" is one of the more nonsensical
> justifications for not publicly providing updates for their own product.
Especially in light of the fact that you can easily and legally get
the sourc
Hi Bill -
> Thank you to all who responded to my inquiry below. As explained by a
> few people, Polycom has a policy of withholding current firmware
> releases from users, thus forcing them to contact "authorized" resellers
> for support should they need this code. Similar to another reported
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
