On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Christopher Jacob wrote:
[Deleted]
> So, the moral of this story
>
> While Polycom may not offer configuration type support for asterisk, they
> stand by their hardware. With Cisco you have to shop around to find a decent
> deal, and who know how you're going to get supp
> If you've considered the Snom, you might also want to test a
> Zultys 4x4 or 4x5. I picked a 4x5 up off of ebay recently and
> have been pleasantly surprised by it. While I don't currently
> have a Polycom to compare it with, I would rank the audio
> quality equal to the Cisco's. It also just 'do
Noah Miller wrote:
My experience is that the Cisco and Polycom phones are both about in
terms audio quality and useability. Neither one does exactly what I'd
expect with respect to multiple lines. They both take a little extra
setup in this regard, but you can read the wiki for that stuff. Sn
pe questions. After all
I don't expect Super Micro to help me get FC running on one of their
motherboards...
Just my thoughts
~c
--
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:13:14 -0500
From: Noah Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Po
Not sure the rquirements for your receptionist. I have found that the
IP600 does have most everything required to function properly. If you
do have an office without DID and a lot of traffic then you may want to
look at the tools to display status on her computer. I do have a Snom
inhouse for testi
