Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-18 Thread Rich Adamson
That does not sound right at all. The difference between the two Time= values should have been 10 (milliseconds). Did you reboot the Sipura after making the change? There are some values in the Sipura that don't take effect until after the next reboot; I don't have a clue whether this

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-18 Thread Pedro
Rich - thanks! Glad I am not the only one seeing this :) Would be very interested in your results. No problems that I see yet with these settings. On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:21:08 -0600, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That does not sound right at all. The difference between the two

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-17 Thread Pedro
? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pedro Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 3:20 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN FYI - Seems

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-17 Thread Rich Adamson
Actually - jitter does not seem to be the issue (sound is not garbled and does not drop out, it was just very low and fuzzy/staticy when not set to 10 ms). It is weird that I have to drop to 10ms, but I have tested some more and the general consenses from the people I have called said it

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-17 Thread Pedro
That does not sound right at all. The difference between the two Time= values should have been 10 (milliseconds). Did you reboot the Sipura after making the change? There are some values in the Sipura that don't take effect until after the next reboot; I don't have a clue whether this

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-17 Thread Keith Burns
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pedro Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 5:20 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN That does not sound right at all. The difference between the two Time= values should have

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-16 Thread Pedro
- Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN Actually the SPA-2100 supports 2 g729 channels which is why I bought it. Unfortunately, the call quality is just as poor on the 2100 as it is on the 2000. - Pedro On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-16 Thread Pedro
] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN Actually the SPA-2100 supports 2 g729 channels which is why I bought it. Unfortunately, the call quality is just as poor on the 2100 as it is on the 2000. - Pedro On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:12:51 +, Jeffrey Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-16 Thread Pedro
List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN Actually the SPA-2100 supports 2 g729 channels which is why I bought it. Unfortunately, the call quality is just as poor on the 2100 as it is on the 2000. - Pedro

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-16 Thread Keith Burns
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN Next thing I would check are the de-jitter buffers if possible on the Sipura, or jitter in general. Do you have control of the PSTN gateway ? Measure the jitter on ingress to the gateway. You can do this crudely by using Ethereal

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-16 Thread Keith Burns
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN FYI - Seems the latest firmware in conjunction with changing the packet size to 10ms improved the call quality to usable. The Cisco 7960 is stell superior, but now at least the SPA-2100 is acceptable (and with 2 working g729 channels

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-15 Thread Mark Eissler
On Feb 14, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Pedro wrote: Is it just a bad implementation of g729 compression with the Sipura product line? That would be my guess. -mark -- Mark Eissler, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mixtur Interactive, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mixtur.com

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-15 Thread Pedro
uggg. Is anyone out there having any luck with the SPA-2000 or SPA-2100 using the g729 codec with decent call quality? On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:19:05 -0500, Mark Eissler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 14, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Pedro wrote: Is it just a bad implementation of g729

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-15 Thread Pedro
Actually the SPA-2100 supports 2 g729 channels which is why I bought it. Unfortunately, the call quality is just as poor on the 2100 as it is on the 2000. - Pedro On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:12:51 +, Jeffrey Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it just a bad implementation of g729 compression

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-15 Thread Keith Burns
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pedro Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 6:30 PM To: Jeffrey Chan Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN Actually the SPA-2100 supports 2 g729 channels which is why I bought

[Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN

2005-02-14 Thread Pedro
If this has been covered before - I appologize. We use some Sipura SPA-2000's with the g711 codec and all seems fine (except for the occasional failure to register errors in my asterisk logs - but I will save that for another post). g711 call quality is on par with our Cisco 7960's. However,