To complete my project, I would like to setup DIDs in several areas.
What do I need to do that? Another Asterisk box or can I use gateways
instead? Which hardware can I use? Who has experience?
bye
Ronald
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@l
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
> To complete my project, I would like to setup DIDs in several areas.
>
> What do I need to do that? Another Asterisk box or can I use gateways
> instead? Which hardware can I use? Who has experience?
You either set up your own points of presence, or
Greg Hill wrote:
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
To complete my project, I would like to setup DIDs in several areas.
What do I need to do that? Another Asterisk box or can I use gateways
instead? Which hardware can I use? Who has experience?
You either set up your own points o
On 25/12/2004 16:27 Ronald Wiplinger said the following:
I am looking for a small device with four FXO and one WAN connection.
Simple, so that the cleaning woman can make a hardware reset if
there're a number of FXO/SIP gateways you can consider.
--
Regards, /\_/\ "All
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 04:27:52PM +0800, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
> Greg Hill wrote:
>
> I am looking for a small device with four FXO and one WAN connection.
> Simple, so that the cleaning woman can make a hardware reset if
> necessary. This device should be connnected to my Asterisk box. The b
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:43:00 -0500, Dorn Hetzel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 04:27:52PM +0800, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
Greg Hill wrote:
I am looking for a small device with four FXO and one WAN connection.
Simple, so that the cleaning woman can make a hardware reset if
nece
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 12:16:24PM -0600, James Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:43:00 -0500, Dorn Hetzel
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 04:27:52PM +0800, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
> >>Greg Hill wrote:
> >>
> >>I am looking for a small device with four FXO and one
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:17:59 -0500, Dorn Hetzel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 12:16:24PM -0600, James Taylor wrote:
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:43:00 -0500, Dorn Hetzel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 04:27:52PM +0800, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
>>Greg Hill wrote
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:17:59 -0500, Dorn Hetzel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 12:16:24PM -0600, James Taylor wrote:
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:43:00 -0500, Dorn Hetzel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 04:27:52PM +0800, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
>>Greg Hill wrote
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 02:22:43PM -0600, James Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:17:59 -0500, Dorn Hetzel
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 12:16:24PM -0600, James Taylor wrote:
> >>On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:43:00 -0500, Dorn Hetzel
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
Dorn Hetzel wrote:
(a) there are definitely analog DID implementations out there.
not saying they're pretty, but they exist...
(b) are you really sure it's cheaper with only 4 channels to
do a T1? including local loop?
As far as I know, Asterisk/Zaptel does not support analog DID service
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:26:48 -0600, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dorn Hetzel wrote:
(a) there are definitely analog DID implementations out there.
not saying they're pretty, but they exist...
(b) are you really sure it's cheaper with only 4 channels to
d
As far as I know, Asterisk/Zaptel does not support analog DID service.
--Eric
I am thinking that there is some confusion about DID's.
The only important difference between an analog DID and a POTS line is
that when you pick up a DID, you are sent via DTMF the number (or a
portion there of) that
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:33:43 -0800, Christopher Dobbs wrote:
>
>>>
>>> As far as I know, Asterisk/Zaptel does not support analog DID service.
>>>
>>> --Eric
>>
>
>I am thinking that there is some confusion about DID's.
>
>The only important difference between an analog DID and a POTS line is
>tha
14 matches
Mail list logo
