Hi All
is anyone in Australia using the x100p card. If so can you please send
me you config as in zaptel.conf and zapata.conf and any other relavent
configs to get it working.
regards
Joseph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://l
Hi all,
Just a quick question
Does digium x100p support 3.3v pci (64 bit 66mhz) ?
Regards,
Soragan
Hello!
I've been following this list for several weeks now and would like to
purchase some hardware for a VOIP/ voice-mail solution. This card appears
strikingly similar to a modem. Is it? Is there a product to bring in more
than one POTS line short of a full T1? It just seems silly that th
I live in Japan and last Sunday I bought my first X100P to see
if it really works for my H323 application.
How long time it should take to be delivered?
Isamar
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listin
What is the proper method to install/configure an X100P FXO
card?
Title: Leterhead
Hiya
all,
I have just received my X100P telco card and I don’t
seem to be able to talk to it.
I am a bit of a numpty on Linux being from the Windows
(wash my mouth with soap and water) background, so any help would be appreciated.
I have checked under YaST2 a
Is there any reason why this combination shouldn’t work?
Hi Gurus
How do I make x100P does not answer incoming calls ? I want * play dead for
incoming calls.
I do not have any context for incoming calls from x100p, in zapata.conf.
Call also get logged into the CDR, that too I do not want.
I am using x100p for outgoing calls only.
Any help appreciate.
Title: X100p problem
I am having a problem with the x100p cards. It doesn't matter whether the card is in the machine or not, all I get is a busy signal when calling. The Asterisk box doesn't give me any errors and doesn't show that any call is coming through. I removed the cards from the
no why would it need to do that? If I put one in my 64 bit slots the
machine won't boot.
bkw
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Soragan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick question
>
> Does digium x100p support 3.3v pci (64 bit 66mhz) ?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Soragan
>
>
>
>
__
t; [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 2:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P
>
> no why would it need to do that? If I put one in my 64 bit slots the
> machine won't boot.
>
> bkw
>
Soragan wrote:
I have only 2 64 bits on my server's mobo :(
I was wondering if it would work because the card's interface can fit into
the 64 bits slot. I guess I have to change the motherboard.
Regards,
Soragan
If you only need one analog channel infor your Asterisk box then you are
probabl
CTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P
>
> Soragan wrote:
>
> >I have only 2 64 bits on my server's mobo :(
> >I was wondering if it would work because the card's interface can fit
> into
> >the 64 bits slot. I guess I have to change the motherboard
> I only have 1 server which is dual p3 1ghz.
> Its mobo only has 2 64 bits pci. :(
Not good. Throw it away in my house's trash can and I send
you 4 Pentium 2... more details in pvt. :-)
Isamar
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Soragan wrote:
> I only have 1 server which is dual p3 1ghz.
> Its mobo only has 2 64 bits pci. :(
Ohh.. You better give that to me then. I'll send you my Pentium 133 w/ 16
megs of ram. It works great with the X100P.
--
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Serv
> Ohh.. You better give that to me then. I'll send you my Pentium 133 w/ 16
> megs of ram. It works great with the X100P.
LOL, can your Pentium do web server, mail server with spam and virus
checking and ADSL router all together? If it can do without any performance
loses compare with mine, I'd be
Soragan wrote:
Ohh.. You better give that to me then. I'll send you my Pentium 133 w/ 16
megs of ram. It works great with the X100P.
LOL, can your Pentium do web server, mail server with spam and virus
checking and ADSL router all together? If it can do without any performance
loses compare w
On Monday 09 February 2004 00:26, Soragan wrote:
> > Ohh.. You better give that to me then. I'll send you my Pentium
> > 133 w/ 16 megs of ram. It works great with the X100P.
>
> LOL, can your Pentium do web server, mail server with spam and
> virus checking and ADSL router all together? If it can
> no why would it need to do that? If I put one in my 64 bit slots the
> machine won't boot.
Digium X100P's do work in 64-bit and 3.3V slots just fine.
Mark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/ast
> On Monday 09 February 2004 00:26, Soragan wrote:
> > > Ohh.. You better give that to me then. I'll send you my Pentium
> > > 133 w/ 16 megs of ram. It works great with the X100P.
> >
> > LOL, can your Pentium do web server, mail server with spam and
> > virus checking and ADSL router all together
Hi everyone.
I've now managed to my basic voip setup working, but I have a problem with my
fxo cards.
If I plug the cards into the pstn line whilst a normall phone is also plugged
in, the normal phone continually rings. I'm convinced that this is a problem
with the wiring but I don't know what/w
Calls to the pstn on our x100p experience a very low volume. Any parameters
to change this ?
Thanks,
Chris
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Thought I would post this experience to the list so it's archived for
posterity... My company is deploying Asterisk-based PBX's to all of our
branch offices. Each office has 2 analog Voice lines and a fax line.
We didn't want to go to the expense of using TDM400's in the servers
(which run a
I am out of things to try on getting an X100P card to work.
I have a P4 system with CentOS 5.1 installed (network install). After
adding required packages I compiled (apparently successful) and
installed Zaptel in anticipation of installing Asterisk.
I simply cannot get the X100P card to be reco
Hi all,
I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and would like some feedback about
this card.
Does anyone already used this card? Does anyone recommend it ? or not?
I'd appreciate any comments.
Thanks.
Ronaldo.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Ea
Hi All:
I have a x100p card and asterisk installed to my computer, can I use this
card and a softphone to call other phone?
Thanks
--
Refer to: http://www.microsuncn.com
Best Regards
Alan Zheng
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.
Title: Message
Hi
I have 2 x X100P on
UK BT, both have been working fine for a while, but now I have started to
get a beeping sound my end every 8/10 sec, and break-up in the voice call
inbound/outbound.
Any
ideas???
Rgds
Hello, folks,
I'm having a problem where my X100P isn't behaving
the way I think it should.
I have the hardware installed fine, with the phone
line connected to the port labeled 'line', and nothing
in the port labeled 'phone'.
The zaptel and wcfxo modules load fine, and there is
a line in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm experiencing frequent kernel panics when using the X100P card under
the 2.6.6 Fedora kernel. I've attached the kernel output to this message
- - it looks like the IRQ stack is overflowing and trashing some memory,
causing a series of oopses fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've confirmed that the stack overflows caused by the X100P driver are
caused by running it in a 4K-stacks kernel - it works ok with the linuxant
16K-stacks kernel, even with the CPU under a high load.
- --
- Steve Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hello,
I have X100P card
but exten => _9X.,1,Dial(Zap/1/${EXTEN:1})
does not work.
The error is app_dial.c:803
dial_exec: Unable to create channel of type 'Zap' (cause
0)
Zap show channel, lspci etc show everything is
normal.
Because X100P is Intel 537 modem, so can I use it as true modem
Hi,
I have just installed my first X100P card, and
seams to be half working.
You can call the public telephone number which the
card is attached to and hear some lady telling you about asterisk. If I
dial the extention number of the phone I want to call, it connects and it's all
good.
Hi,
I seam to have a problem working out how to get my X100P to answer after
1 ring. Currently it is working fine and connects to the switchboard
menu correctly but just does it after 4 rings, which I would prefer if
we could reduce.
Thanks
Mark
--
Mark Olliver
Thermeon Europe Ltd.
e-Card:
I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the
net for digium "clones", because it's very hard for me to get a digium
card (X100P).
Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based
modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but I did not find any of tho
Hello all,
I have just installed a Wildcard X100P into an Asterisk box. I connected
the line socket to the internal telephone system where I work. The card is
identified to asterisk etc, however I am unable to recieve or make calls.
When attempting to dial I get:
Executing Dial("SIP/1106-ec8b", "
Title: X100P DID
Systems:
Definity G3rV6
Suse 9.1 with two X100P cards.
I'm having trouble getting Asterisk to interface with my Definity.
I can call out fine (Asterisk to Definity), but if I call either X100P (DID from Definity), strange things happen.
I figure I should probably get d
I have a customer that has 10 analog lines (he can't get digital
where he's located). I'm currently using 3 TDM04B cards but I have
the damn echo problem all the time what ever setting I do (I followed
all the steps I could find in the Wiki and in this forum but none
work). I even tried on
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding X100P card.
>
> I have one X100P card in an * box.
> I have the telco line connected to the line port of the X100P card, and an
> analog phone connected to the phone port of the X100P card.
>
> My question is:
> How to make ringing the analog phone connected
Why my X100P detect the ring after 3 o 4 seconds?
The funny thing that when I have an incoming call asterisk receive a
signal but the commands start after 3 or 4 seconds. Moreover, when the
call end the hungup has the same delay.
any ideas?
___
Asterisk-U
I've got a voicemail server I made from four X100P cards (off eBay),
Fedora Core 4, connected to a Toshiba DK40 system. I'm using
Asterisk 1.0.9, and Zaptel 1.0.9.2.
It works great, except the card which receives a majority of the
activity occationally will go into a 'Red' alarm and then
> Is there a product to bring in more than one POTS line short of a full
> T1? It just seems silly that the technology hasn't advanced any
> further than to have a single line per card.
We are working on an FXO module for the TDM400P and hope to have it ready
in a couple of months for initial tes
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 12:39:20AM -0500, Asterisk wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've been following this list for several weeks now and would like to
> purchase some hardware for a VOIP/ voice-mail solution. This card appears
> strikingly similar to a modem. Is it? Is there a product to bring in more
>
> Well there are some products which may fit your bill, but will take more
of your bills:
>
> www.voicetronix.com sells a 4 port PCI FXO at about AU$1000, a 6 port
I think their 4 port card is FXS, can it be FXO as well?
-Matt
___
Asterisk-Users mail
>
> >
> > Well there are some products which may fit your bill, but will take more
> of your bills:
> >
> > www.voicetronix.com sells a 4 port PCI FXO at about AU$1000, a 6 port
>
> I think their 4 port card is FXS, can it be FXO as well?
> -Matt
I'm sorry, I pick a bad week to stop sniffing glue,
> > Is there a product to bring in more than one POTS line short of a full
> > T1? It just seems silly that the technology hasn't advanced any
> > further than to have a single line per card.
>
> We are working on an FXO module for the TDM400P and hope to have it ready
> in a couple of months f
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 05:10:33PM -1000, Matthew John Darnell wrote:
>
>
> > > Is there a product to bring in more than one POTS line short of a full
> > > T1? It just seems silly that the technology hasn't advanced any
> > > further than to have a single line per card.
> >
> > We are working
> > Is there a product to bring in more than one POTS line short of a full
> T1? It just seems silly that the technology hasn't advanced any
> further than to have a single line per card.
We are working on an FXO module for the TDM400P and hope to have it ready
in a couple of months for initi
> > Is there a product to bring in more than one POTS line short of a full
> T1? It just seems silly that the technology hasn't advanced any
> further than to have a single line per card.
We are working on an FXO module for the TDM400P and hope to have it ready
in a couple of months for initi
G'Day,
I need from regarding using the X100P. Some are specific to Australia and
I have been told in IRC there are already existing users in oz, so I
would appreciate your input.
1) Is the X100P Australia telco approved?
2) I have setup asterisk with X100P and whenever I dial in I cannot get
any
Hello.
Does asterisk detect fax tones so it can switch to an extension where a
regular fax machine is ?
I've looked at the archives, and there seems to be a lot of debate about the
fax issue in general.
The last one, in January, I think, talked about a user that had fax tones in
his voicemail,
How the X100P card detect the arrival of a call? I
have a bunch of cards and they perform perfectly when connected to a PBX, but
when I connect to another brand of PBX, they don't unhook the line, or in other
words, they don't answer the line. If I connect a normal analog phone on the
same l
for me it takes between 2 and 3 weeksstandard delivery.
BR,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 6:23 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] X100P delivery
>
>
> I live in Japan and last Sunday I bou
It appears that my X100P card is only answering after two rings. Ideally,
I'd like it to answer on the first ring. Here is the incoming section of my
extensions.conf file:
[incoming]
exten => s,1,Answer
exten => s,2,BackGround(demo-congrats); Play a congratulatory message
exten => 1234,1,G
Hi,
Can incoming fax from X100P FXO received on TDM400P
FXS port (which is connected to a fax machine)?
If possible, at what speed, 14400 or 9600 baud
rate?
Thanks.
I've got * up and running everything seems to work ok except for when you
dial out using the X100P card.
Everything sounds great this end but the person you call complains that they
can't hear you very well (Very Whispered).
Is their any way to turn up the volume. I've fiddled with the gain set
When a call is placed connecting to the X100P, the volume of the call is
very low. I have played with the gain settings without many results.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Kevin
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/m
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:05
PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] X100P
Config
Hiya
all,
I
have just received my X100P telco card and I dont seem to be able to talk to
it.
I
am a bit of a numpty on Linux being from the Windows (wash my
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]
X100P Config
What do
you have configured in your /etc/zaptel.conf * /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf file.
Also, submit a cat /proc/pci this should show a device Tiger Jet Network
Inc. if the pci bus recognized the card.
-
Original Message
LeterheadThe FAQ at digium explains how to do it:
http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=faq#Configuration_7
- Original Message -
From: David J Carter
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 5:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Config
Hi,
I can see the card with a
Thanks for that.
I will check there in the morning.
Chow for now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of TeleSIP
Sent: 10 October 2003 23:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Config
LeterheadThe FAQ at digium explains how
Hi again,
When I run "modprobe zaptel" I get the message that the zaptel.o was
compiled for kernel version 2.4.20-4GB while this kernel version is
2.4.20-4GB-athlon. And fails.
When I run "modprobe wcfxo" I get the message that the zaptel.o was
compiled for kernel version 2.4.20
Hi All.
When I run "modprobe zaptel" I get the message that the zaptel.o was
compiled for kernel version 2.4.20-4GB while this kernel version is
2.4.20-4GB-athlon. And fails.
When I run "modprobe wcfxo" I get the message that the zaptel.o was
compiled for kernel version 2.4.20-4GB
Has anyone experienced low volume with a X100P FXO card? If so, can you
offer some suggestions to improve the volume and quality of the
connection?
I have adjusted the tx&rx gains without much success.
Kevin
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of TeleSIP
Sent: 10 October 2003 23:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Config
LeterheadThe FAQ at digium explains how to do it:
http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=faq#Configu
> When I run "modprobe zaptel" I get the message that the zaptel.o was
> compiled for kernel version 2.4.20-4GB while this kernel version is
> 2.4.20-4GB-athlon. And fails.
>
> When I run "modprobe wcfxo" I get the message that the zaptel.o was compiled
> for kernel version 2.4.20-4GB while this
ow it goes.
Cheers
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rich Adamson
Sent: 13 October 2003 17:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Config
> When I run "modprobe zaptel" I get the message that the zaptel.o wa
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Config
When I run "modprobe zaptel" I get the message that the zaptel.o was
compiled for kernel version 2.4.20-4GB while this kernel version is
2.4.20-4GB-athlon. And fails.
When I run "modprobe wcfxo" I get the
questions again very soon.
Regards
Dave
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Chris Hirsch
Sent: 14 October 2003 15:58
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]
X100P Config
you can also do an insmod
-N wcfxo (the -N checks
I have an X100P used, at present, largely for outgoing calls. It shares the
single incoming POTS line with a number of analog phones. Is it possible to
talk the X100P (Zap/1) to answer a ringing call only if I ask it to? I'd
like to use only the SIP phone in my office, but let the analog phones
I recompiled Asterisk with the aggressive echo cancellation on. That's
all I changed, honest. After recompiling, it refused to run. I tried
updating the source, etc, and eventually went back to no echo
cancellation. Every time, I got this error while starting Asterisk.
Please help! I have no
> Is there any reason why this combination shouldn't work?
I've never tested it, but I don't know why it wouldn't. I have had recent
issues with getting an overly hot signal (although that was a channel bank
problem). You might try cranking the rxgain or txgain into the negative
and see if that h
I have a couple of X100P's in my system and
while on calls they just randomly hang up for no reason.
I have tried messing with the busydetect
and callprogress setting them to yes and no same and still random
hangups. Is there another setting I should be looking at?
My zap config looks li
Anyone using a X100P in India? Does it work?
Thanks
-Suresh
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Hi People,
I have the following scenario:
PSTN via Ibercom - 3 x X100P - Asterisk - Sip phones
Ibercom = A product of Telefonica in Spain, interconnecting with old Ericsson
equipment buildings of the same company via PRI and also connecting with PSTN
via PRI.
My problem is that when I have a
SW <> wrote:
> Hi Gurus
Not a guru, but I'll see what I can do.
> How do I make x100P does not answer incoming calls ?
The only thing that springs to mind is that you create an incoming
context, and have an extension like:
Exten => s,1,Wait(1000)
Dunno if it will work or not,
On Friday 19 December 2003 08:12, David Gomillion wrote:
> > How do I make x100P does not answer incoming calls ?
>
> The only thing that springs to mind is that you create an incoming
> context, and have an extension like:
>
> Exten => s,1,Wait(1000)
>
> Dunno if it will work or no
>> Exten => s,1,Wait(1000)
This will make * not answering the call, but still you would see notices
coming on your screen and also an entry in CDR.
>immediate=no
Will try this out
SW
From: Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Garland
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 3:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] X100p problem
I am having a problem with the x100p cards. It doesn't matter whether the
card is in the machine or not, all I
Hi all,
I just now receive the FXO X101P Card but can't at any way make then call out.
I can hear the signal, even call but always receive from my local operator error that or the number don't exist or need more numbers.
I play alot with txgain and rxgain, but none help me out.
Bein
Hi - I'm wondering if anyone has had any experiences with this:
I've got an X100P card, and an HP DL380 Gen3 server I want to put
it in. The server has 2xPCI-X 100 and 1xPCI-X 133 hot-plug slots.
It's my understanding that the PCI-X slots are completely backward-
compatible with standard PCI card
On Saturday 06 March 2004 10:03 am, Jon Lawrence wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> I've now managed to my basic voip setup working, but I have a problem with
> my fxo cards.
> If I plug the cards into the pstn line whilst a normall phone is also
> plugged in, the normal phone continually rings. I'm convinced
On Saturday 06 March 2004 11:16, you wrote:
> I was having a similar problem with all the none asterisk'd phones ringing,
> but it was only occasionally. I solved the problem by plugging everything
> through asterisk! *8-)
>
> I'd be surprised if the alarm can't also be configured in a similar way
The root cause of the problem is the 3 wire phone wiring in the UK compared
to the 2 wire wiring in the US. I've had the problem you mention just
using ordinary phones! I suspect that a socket somewhere has been wired up
with wires crossed. Your X100P probably needs to go straight across the
at a normal volume.
Also in zapata.conf enable echotraining. I posted about this about 3 days
ago.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Clifton
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 7:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
Ed,
Thanks a lot, will try.
- Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Rubright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] x100p volume
> Brian West had sent this to the list back in Decemb
you check anything else.
Sincerely,
Ryan R. Fligg
-Original Message-
From: Chris Clifton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] x100p volume
Calls to the pstn on our x100p experience a very low volume. Any par
> Calls to the pstn on our x100p experience a very low volume. Any parameters
> to change this ?
Here's my zapata.conf:
; This is the incoming Business line X100P card
context=bus-ivr-main
switchtype=national
signalling=fxs_ks
echotraining=yes
usecallerid=yes
hidecallerid=no
callwaiting=yes
callw
> Be careful with setting the volume in this manner. This tip might save you
> a bunch of headaches. I adjusted the TX on my X100P cards to low negatives
> values in accordance with the feedback I received from ztmonitor. When I
> achieved the levels that were satisfactory to me an interesting p
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brent Davidson wrote:
> That 3 foot cable run passes behind a
> 21" monitor that was connected to the server. When the line tests
> showed everything OK, I decided the monitor might be a long shot but I
> could understand how the degaussing coil coil could possibly induce a
>
I considered doing just that, but since I didn't have my scope with me
and it's an hour's drive away it didn't seem worth it at this point. If
we have trouble again I may take the scope down there and test it.
-Brent
Steve Edwards wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brent Davidson wrote:
That 3
Quoting Brent Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I considered doing just that, but since I didn't have my scope with me
> and it's an hour's drive away it didn't seem worth it at this point.
> If we have trouble again I may take the scope down there and test it.
>
unless the cable is in the same spo
Does it show up in 'lspci'?
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Bob Smither wrote:
> I am out of things to try on getting an X100P card to work.
>
> I have a P4 system with CentOS 5.1 installed (network install). After
> adding required packages I compiled (apparently successful) and
> installed Zaptel in ant
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Does it show up in 'lspci'?
No - With PnPOS = yes, card in first PCI slot - lspci -v does not show
the card. There are several unused interrupts.
I should have included earlier:
Zaptel 1.4.7.1
Thanks.
--
Bob Smither, PhD
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> > Does it show up in 'lspci'?
>
> No - With PnPOS = yes, card in first PCI slot - lspci -v does not show
> the card. There are several unused interrupts.
So until you see it t
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:40 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> > > Does it show up in 'lspci'?
> >
> > No - With PnPOS = yes, card in first PCI slot - lspci -v does not show
> > th
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 08:41:21PM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:40 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> > > > Does it show up in 'lspci'?
> > >
> > > No -
December 2007 3:28 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 08:41:21PM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:40 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
>
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 07:27 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Just to stress the point: you mention that you don't see the card on
> lspci. If this is so: the problem is not with Zaptel - it is below.
> Zaptel doesn't even get a chance.
Thanks Tzafrir. The last thing I tried was to downgrade Zaptel
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 15:46 +1000, Mattt wrote:
> Sounds like a PCI bus version issue ;-)
Thanks Matt, but could you elaborate? The card supposedly supports both
5 and 3.3 volt PCI slots, and the slots on the older system that works
with the card appear the same as on the board giving me grief.
bob,
look on p20 of 'the book' edition 2, or p16 edition 1
this explains the 3.3v vs 5.0v issue with motherboard slots
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9780596510480/
daveC
Bob Smither wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 15:46 +1000, Mattt wrote:
>
>> Sounds like a PCI bus version issue ;-)
>>
1 - 100 of 849 matches
Mail list logo
