On 07/09/2004 at 23:57 Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 08:14:57 -0500, Brian Capouch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you have a Linux laptop with you, then in fact the SIP devices can be
configured to hide behind it. The laptop can then run an instance of
asterisk
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:05:09 +0200, Andy Powell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the risk of stating the obvious if you have a laptop not running MacOSX (ie
perhaps running windows) download my asterisk live! cd (
http://www.automated.it/asterisk/ ), burn it and test it on your laptop and bung
: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:05:09 +0200, Andy Powell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the risk of stating the obvious if you have a laptop not running
MacOSX (ie perhaps running windows) download my asterisk live! cd (
http://www.automated.it/asterisk/ ), burn it and test
'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 6:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura
I run Asterisk on Redhat 8.0 with a VM hosted by Microsoft's Virtual PC
which, in turn, runs on Windows 2000 Server. Works like a charm. Can't
use
Zaptel cards but that's OK for me. I can put
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:52:56 -0400, John Kington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What about sip softphones that use STUN? I am especially interested in UK
because my daughter is going to study in London.
At 02:23 AM 9/10/2004 +0900, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If she is going to be on a residential
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
However, you could use VMware on an Intel notebook to run both Windoze
and Linux concurrently. This wouldn't be ideal for a real PBX for
performance reasons, but since all you are going to use Asterisk for
is to be a gateway for
PROTECTED];
Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Andy Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
However, you could use VMware
At 09:54 PM 9/7/2004 +0900, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For travelling, no SIP based device will be configure and forget.
Perhaps if you travel only within the US, you may be lucky most of the
time but pretty much anywhere else where IP addresses are scarce you
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:52:56 -0400, John Kington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about sip softphones that use STUN? I am especially interested in UK
because my daughter is going to study in London.
If she is going to be on a residential ADSL, that shouldn't be a
problem. I have friends in the UK
Florin Andrei wrote:
I need a cheap simple adaptor for analog phones to use with Asterisk. It
should be some kind of configure and forget type of device, to use at
the office, or just throw it in a road warrior's bag and use it while
travelling, to call back to the mothership.
I can't decide
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 22:35:46 -0700, Florin Andrei
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need a cheap simple adaptor for analog phones to use with Asterisk. It
should be some kind of configure and forget type of device, to use at
the office, or just throw it in a road warrior's bag and use it while
the only problem you will have whilst travelling with the iaxy is that
it supports only bandwidth hungry codecs. so if you are anywhere in the
world where bandwidth is a problem, the iaxy is a nogo
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 14:54, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 22:35:46 -0700, Florin Andrei
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need a cheap simple adaptor for analog phones to use with Asterisk. It
should be some kind of configure and forget type of device, to use at
the office, or just throw it in a road
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 08:14:57 -0500, Brian Capouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have a Linux laptop with you, then in fact the SIP devices can be
configured to hide behind it. The laptop can then run an instance of
asterisk that connects to the home asterisk server,
Like I said: I run
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 05:57, Michael Bielicki wrote:
the only problem you will have whilst travelling with the iaxy is that
it supports only bandwidth hungry codecs. so if you are anywhere in the
world where bandwidth is a problem, the iaxy is a nogo
Would iaxy work over a plain dialup
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 12:31, Florin Andrei wrote:
Would iaxy work over a plain dialup connection? 56k? 33k?
(assuming the bandwidth is fine between the ISP and the location of the
Asterisk server)
No. The IAXy supports only G711 and ADPCM or G726 (I don't recall
which). Both take MUCH more
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 10:31:58 -0700, Florin Andrei
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would iaxy work over a plain dialup connection? 56k? 33k?
(assuming the bandwidth is fine between the ISP and the location of the
Asterisk server)
The IAXy supports ADPCM which is 32k. Considering the IP overhead you
-
From: Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 10:31:58 -0700, Florin Andrei
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:40:00 -0500, Lyle Giese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, I thought 56k modems were 56k outbound only and maxs at 33k inbound
or did the standard change again when I wasn't looking?
And besides when did you get better than 28.8 through a hotel PBX? 33k
with a 56k modem in
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
I have been travelling a lot on all inhabited continents, using hotel
provided internet connections, internet cafes, client's office LANs,
hotspots in public places, cafes, airports etc etc.
The most common experience is SIP doesn't work at all and the
I need a cheap simple adaptor for analog phones to use with Asterisk. It
should be some kind of configure and forget type of device, to use at
the office, or just throw it in a road warrior's bag and use it while
travelling, to call back to the mothership
For travelling, no SIP based
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 19:13:34 -0600, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Believe or not, I've been using a snom 200 configured with nat and haven't found
any US locations where it doesn't work with a couple of exceptions.
Read my post again and you will find that I was talking about
locations
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:40:00 -0500, Lyle Giese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, I thought 56k modems were 56k outbound only and maxs at 33k inbound
or did the standard change again when I wasn't looking?
And besides when did you get better than 28.8 through a hotel PBX? 33k
with a 56k modem in
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:40:00 -0500, Lyle Giese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmmm, I thought 56k modems were 56k outbound only and maxs at 33k
inbound
or did the standard change again when I wasn't
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 08:06:18 +0800, Leo Ann Boon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
I have been travelling a lot on all inhabited continents, using hotel
provided internet connections, internet cafes, client's office LANs,
hotspots in public places, cafes,
I need a cheap simple adaptor for analog phones to use with Asterisk. It
should be some kind of configure and forget type of device, to use at
the office, or just throw it in a road warrior's bag and use it while
travelling, to call back to the mothership.
I can't decide between iaxy and sipura.
26 matches
Mail list logo
