Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-05 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Steve Underwood wrote: > Spandsp doesn't support those features. I don't know anything which > does. It seems they can only be used with TCP. Spandsp does support > > T38FaxFillBitRemoval > > which the FAX for Asterisk package does not (according to Commetrex). I added indication of T38FaxTran

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Vinícius Fontes
- "Kevin P. Fleming" escreveu: > Vinícius Fontes wrote: > > > I've put it on pastebin because is was a lot of text. Here's the > link: http://pastebin.com/m7467cea1. That's all the information on the > CLI with verbose=3 and "sip set debug peer voxip". > > OK, with the complete capture we

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Underwood
On 02/03/2010 03:14 AM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Steve Underwood wrote: > > >> I wonder why Asterisk would say: >> >> X-asterisk-Info: SIP re-invite (External RTP bridge) >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Length: 344 >> >> v=0 >> o=root 44350963 44350964 IN IP4 10.153.66.146 >> s=Ast

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Vinícius Fontes wrote: > I've put it on pastebin because is was a lot of text. Here's the link: > http://pastebin.com/m7467cea1. That's all the information on the CLI with > verbose=3 and "sip set debug peer voxip". OK, with the complete capture we can see that the problem is actually quite di

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Vinícius Fontes
- "Steve Underwood" escreveu: > On 02/03/2010 12:45 AM, Vinícius Fontes wrote: > > - "Kevin P. Fleming" escreveu: > > > > > >> Vinícius Fontes wrote: > >> > >> > >>> I couldn't agree more Steve. > >>> > >>> Is there any other info I could provide in order to help you find > >>>

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Steve Underwood wrote: > I wonder why Asterisk would say: > > X-asterisk-Info: SIP re-invite (External RTP bridge) > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Length: 344 > > v=0 > o=root 44350963 44350964 IN IP4 10.153.66.146 > s=Asterisk PBX 1.6.1.13 > c=IN IP4 10.153.66.146 > t=0 0 > m=image 48

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Underwood
On 02/03/2010 12:45 AM, Vinícius Fontes wrote: > - "Kevin P. Fleming" escreveu: > > >> Vinícius Fontes wrote: >> >> >>> I couldn't agree more Steve. >>> >>> Is there any other info I could provide in order to help you find >>> >> out what's wrong? I could even open an issue o

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Vinícius Fontes
- "Vinícius Fontes" escreveu: > - "Kevin P. Fleming" escreveu: > > > Vinícius Fontes wrote: > > > > > I couldn't agree more Steve. > > > > > > Is there any other info I could provide in order to help you find > > out what's wrong? I could even open an issue on Mantis if the > Digium >

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Vinícius Fontes
- "Kevin P. Fleming" escreveu: > Vinícius Fontes wrote: > > > I couldn't agree more Steve. > > > > Is there any other info I could provide in order to help you find > out what's wrong? I could even open an issue on Mantis if the Digium > staff think it's worth it. > > Post a 'sip set debug

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Vinícius Fontes wrote: > I couldn't agree more Steve. > > Is there any other info I could provide in order to help you find out what's > wrong? I could even open an issue on Mantis if the Digium staff think it's > worth it. Post a 'sip set debug' capture of the failing call in this thread; tha

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Vinícius Fontes
- "Steve Underwood" escreveu: > On 02/02/2010 10:11 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > > Steve Underwood wrote: > > > >> Hi Kevin, > >> > >> On 02/02/2010 09:12 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > >> > >>> Vinícius Fontes wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > [Feb 2 08:38:06] DEBUG[21032]:

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Steve Underwood wrote: > That's how T.38 calls normally start. They mostly start as audio, and > switch into T.38 mode later. We have only seen an initial fragment in > the log. We haven't seen anything that's actually wrong. We see an offer > to do telephony events, and from there things might

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Underwood
On 02/02/2010 10:11 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Steve Underwood wrote: > >> Hi Kevin, >> >> On 02/02/2010 09:12 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: >> >>> Vinícius Fontes wrote: >>> >>> >>> [Feb 2 08:38:06] DEBUG[21032]: chan_sip.c:7589 process_sdp: Processing session-level

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Steve Underwood wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > On 02/02/2010 09:12 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: >> Vinícius Fontes wrote: >> >> >>> [Feb 2 08:38:06] DEBUG[21032]: chan_sip.c:7589 process_sdp: Processing >>> session-level SDP v=0... UNSUPPORTED. >>> [Feb 2 08:38:06] DEBUG[21032]: chan_sip.c:7589 proc

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Kevin, On 02/02/2010 09:12 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Vinícius Fontes wrote: > > >> [Feb 2 08:38:06] DEBUG[21032]: chan_sip.c:7589 process_sdp: Processing >> session-level SDP v=0... UNSUPPORTED. >> [Feb 2 08:38:06] DEBUG[21032]: chan_sip.c:7589 process_sdp: Processing >> session-lev

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Vinícius Fontes wrote: > [Feb 2 08:38:06] DEBUG[21032]: chan_sip.c:7589 process_sdp: Processing > session-level SDP v=0... UNSUPPORTED. > [Feb 2 08:38:06] DEBUG[21032]: chan_sip.c:7589 process_sdp: Processing > session-level SDP o=PVG 1265107000170 1265107000170 IN IP4 10.152.0.164... > UNSUP

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 faxing

2010-02-02 Thread Vinícius Fontes
Hello everyone. I'm struggling to get T.38 faxing to work in Asterisk 1.6.1.13 with a SIP DID provider here in Brazil (GVT - Vox IP service). Here's my scenario: When faxes arrive by a specific DID, they are routed thru this simple macro: [macro-recebefax] exten => s,1,Set(DB(fax/count)=$[${DB