Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-10 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
cial Discussion" Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone Snom is an OEM of the Konftel. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of brya...@zktech.com Sent: Sunday,

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-10 Thread Jamie A. Stapleton
: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone Thank you for your responses. No where did I say I hate polycom phones. I personally do not like their approach to sip as a company. Their audio quality is top notch but for me the rest leaves me wanting. Has anyone used the newer

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-09 Thread C F
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Carlos Alvarez wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:02 AM, C F wrote: >> >> I find that the bottom line of all polycom haters is ones inability of >> comprehending the config files and not in its quality. > > > We have no problem with their config files.  They are

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-09 Thread C F
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:03 PM, wrote: > Thank you for your responses. No where did I say I hate polycom phones. I > personally do not like their approach to sip as a company. Their audio > quality  is top notch but for me the rest leaves me wanting. Has anyone used > the newer snom conferenc

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-09 Thread Jim DeVito
You got me. At first the polycom world was hard to get into. But with a little effort to understand the configs and the joys of central provisioning the Polycom are my go to endpoint. Couple the endless configurablity with Polycom quilaty and I have many happy clients. As an aside is that what

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-09 Thread Benny Amorsen
"Luke Hamburg" writes: > Carlos- > Sorry if this is too much of a digression but this piqued my interest as > I've been pretty happy with Polycom in my limited experience (haven't used > the SPAs much, just Yealink & Polycom, and an occasional Snom here and > there). If the config files were no

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-09 Thread Leif Madsen
On 05/01/12 05:24 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Although in my personal opinion, it's really hard to beat the IP5000. That has been my experience as well. -- Leif Madsen http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/asterisk -- _ -- Bandwidt

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-09 Thread Ishfaq Malik
We have a couple of customers using the Snom MeetingPoint and they are very happy with them. On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 12:03 -0500, brya...@zktech.com wrote: > Thank you for your responses. No where did I say I hate polycom phones. I > personally do not like their approach to sip as a company. Their

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-08 Thread Carlos Alvarez
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Luke Hamburg wrote: > Carlos- > Sorry if this is too much of a digression but this piqued my interest as > I've been pretty happy with Polycom in my limited experience (haven't used > the SPAs much, just Yealink & Polycom, and an occasional Snom here and > there).

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-08 Thread Luke Hamburg
you, then what _were_ the problems? Luke -- From: Carlos Alvarez Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 3:38 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone We have no problem with their config files.  They are no worse

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-08 Thread Carlos Alvarez
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:02 AM, C F wrote: > I find that the bottom line of all polycom haters is ones inability of > comprehending the config files and not in its quality. > We have no problem with their config files. They are no worse than anything else, including the SPA series phones that w

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-08 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:03 PM, wrote: > Thank you for your responses. No where did I say I hate polycom phones. I > personally do not like their approach to sip as a company. Their audio > quality is top notch but for me the rest leaves me wanting. Has anyone > used the newer snom conference r

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-08 Thread BryantZ
Thank you for your responses. No where did I say I hate polycom phones. I personally do not like their approach to sip as a company. Their audio quality is top notch but for me the rest leaves me wanting. Has anyone used the newer snom conference room phone? Bryant Zimmerman On Jan 8, 2012,

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-08 Thread C F
I find that the bottom line of all polycom haters is ones inability of comprehending the config files and not in its quality. However check out Panasonic. They make a sip conference phone. On 1/5/12, Carlos Alvarez wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:10 PM, C F wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-05 Thread Carlos Alvarez
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:10 PM, C F wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Bryant Zimmerman > wrote: > > I am looking for a really good SIP conference room phone for use with > > asterisk. I do not like Polycom at all. > > You have a really bad taste. > There was an interesting flamewar one

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-05 Thread C F
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote: > I am looking for a really good SIP conference room phone for use with > asterisk. I do not like Polycom at all. You have a really bad taste. > What would you all recommend? I have > to be able to get them in the US. I found several that

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-05 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 01/05/2012 04:19 PM, Jamie A. Stapleton wrote: http://www.polycom.com/products/voice/conferencing_solutions/conference_phones/soundstation/soundstation_duo.html This doesn't qualify as 'non-Polycom' and it appears to be more expensive than the SoundStation IP5000, since it is basically an

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-05 Thread Jamie A. Stapleton
om] On Behalf Of José Pablo Méndez Soto Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 1:06 PM To: brya...@zktech.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone Hello Bryant, Have you seen the snom meetingpoint? http://www.snom.

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-05 Thread Carlos Alvarez
I guess on a similar vein, anyone have a lower-cost option instead of Polycom? We have customers asking for something about half the price for small conference rooms and light usage. 2012/1/5 José Pablo Méndez Soto > Hello Bryant, > > Have you seen the snom meetingpoint? > http://www.snom.com/e

Re: [asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-05 Thread José Pablo Méndez Soto
Hello Bryant, Have you seen the snom meetingpoint? http://www.snom.com/en/products/sip-conference-phone/snom-meetingpoint/ I don't own one, but it looks like a fine piece of hardware. And snom is manufacturer of supported phones for Microsoft's Lync server (must say something their quality right?

[asterisk-users] Best non polycom SIP conference room phone

2012-01-05 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
I am looking for a really good SIP conference room phone for use with asterisk. I do not like Polycom at all. What would you all recommend? I have to be able to get them in the US. I found several that looked good but could not get them. And yes cost does matter but quality is the most importan