Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Stephen Bosch wrote: Andrew Joakimsen wrote: Well I would wonder how Polycom even had any idea whom your vendor is. The vendor made a request for 2.1.0 on my behalf and let it slip that it was for one of my clients :) What is it about current firmware that makes them so paranoid? For

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Maybe the firmware uses GPL'd code? ;-) Just a theory, don't sue me Polycom! On 4/5/07, Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > Well I would wonder how Polycom even had any idea whom your vendor is. The vendor made a request for 2.1.0 on my behalf and let it slip th

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > Well I would wonder how Polycom even had any idea whom your vendor is. The vendor made a request for 2.1.0 on my behalf and let it slip that it was for one of my clients :) What is it about current firmware that makes them so paranoid? For pete's sake! If the argument is

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

> It's good > to know Polycom has anti-competitive business practices. I also > dislike that they refuse to give out anything but old firmware > versions too. They could do a lot to improve their relationships with their public :( I second that! I like the 501 and 601 phones I have, and they c

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Serial number? Andrew Joakimsen wrote: Well I would wonder how Polycom even had any idea whom your vendor is. On 4/2/07, Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > First-sale doctrine, unless your vendor did something illicit to > obtain Polycom phones there is nothing

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Well I would wonder how Polycom even had any idea whom your vendor is. On 4/2/07, Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > First-sale doctrine, unless your vendor did something illicit to > obtain Polycom phones there is nothing they can do about it. What they can do i

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > First-sale doctrine, unless your vendor did something illicit to > obtain Polycom phones there is nothing they can do about it. What they can do is refuse to keep supplying the vendor, and that's a threat the vendors tend to take seriously, especially if the product is an

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

First-sale doctrine, unless your vendor did something illicit to obtain Polycom phones there is nothing they can do about it. It's good to know Polycom has anti-competitive business practices. I also dislike that they refuse to give out anything but old firmware versions too. On 3/30/07, Stephen

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Flawless as far as I know. Bruce Reeves wrote: Matt, I am running Polycom 2.1 on both 1.4 and 1.2 svn releases without any problems. What kind of issues did you experience? On 3/28/07, *Mike Hammett * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I was previously having an iss

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > Strange that I cant recall any other device that Asterisk was not > working with. So it seems that Polycom is not in compliance with > RFC2543. That and Polycom has been known to flat out refuse support if > you mention the word "Asterisk" That's not the case anymore. Dig

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Strange that I cant recall any other device that Asterisk was not working with. So it seems that Polycom is not in compliance with RFC2543. That and Polycom has been known to flat out refuse support if you mention the word "Asterisk" On 3/28/07, Mike Hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was

RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Reeves Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:07 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk Matt, I am running Polycom 2.1 on both 1.4 and 1.2 svn releases without any problems.

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Matt, I am running Polycom 2.1 on both 1.4 and 1.2 svn releases without any problems. What kind of issues did you experience? On 3/28/07, Mike Hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was previously having an issue with a Polycom phone and Polycom support said that Asterisk didn't play well with

RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 14:30 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk I was previously having an issue with a Polycom phone and Polycom support said that Asterisk didn't play

[asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

I was previously having an issue with a Polycom phone and Polycom support said that Asterisk didn't play well with Polycom firmware versions 1.6.7 and newer due to SIP compatibility issues. I believe I heard a lot of things were fixed\adjusted in 1.4 and was wondering if anyone has had success wit