RE: [asterisk-users] SLES?

2007-04-25 Thread Brad Sumrall
om Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLES? On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 04:46 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:49:12AM +0200, Hans Witvliet wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Just curious, > > > > Quite a while a go, i was checking for supported SW-platform. &

Re: [asterisk-users] SLES?

2007-04-25 Thread Hans Witvliet
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 04:46 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:49:12AM +0200, Hans Witvliet wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Just curious, > > > > Quite a while a go, i was checking for supported SW-platform. > > AFAIR, it was RHES and SLES > > > > Now it's only RHES-4 and FC-3 o

Re: [asterisk-users] SLES?

2007-04-22 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:49:12AM +0200, Hans Witvliet wrote: > Hi all, > > Just curious, > > Quite a while a go, i was checking for supported SW-platform. > AFAIR, it was RHES and SLES > > Now it's only RHES-4 and FC-3 or FC-4. > Not a single syllable about CentOS or SLES-9 or SLES-10 > > It

[asterisk-users] SLES?

2007-04-22 Thread Hans Witvliet
Hi all, Just curious, Quite a while a go, i was checking for supported SW-platform. AFAIR, it was RHES and SLES Now it's only RHES-4 and FC-3 or FC-4. Not a single syllable about CentOS or SLES-9 or SLES-10 It probably just runs fine, but any chance of getting support for their *-enterprise ver