Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour afetr update from 1.2 to 1.4

2007-10-17 Thread Eric "ManxPower" Wieling
Il Neofita wrote: > Hi, > I update from asterisk 1.2 to 1.4 and I have some problems. > In the extensions I used DIAL(SIP/100&SIP/101,30,tTr) if I receive a > call from an external providers > now in 1.4 I recieve only one ring > What can I do to solve this problem? You can start by removing the

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour afetr update from 1.2 to 1.4

2007-10-13 Thread Doug Lytle
Il Neofita wrote: > In the extensions I used DIAL(SIP/100&SIP/101,30,tTr) if I receive a > call from an external providers Remove the r Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." __

[asterisk-users] Strange behaviour afetr update from 1.2 to 1.4

2007-10-13 Thread Il Neofita
Hi, I update from asterisk 1.2 to 1.4 and I have some problems. In the extensions I used DIAL(SIP/100&SIP/101,30,tTr) if I receive a call from an external providers now in 1.4 I recieve only one ring What can I do to solve this problem? ___ --Bandwidth an

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange Behaviour

2007-09-10 Thread Il Neofita
Thank you I will try tonight On 9/10/07, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 05:14 +0200 schrieb Il Neofita: > > On 9/9/07, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 09.09.2007, 20:16 +0200 schrieb Il Neofit

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange Behaviour

2007-09-09 Thread Anselm Martin Hoffmeister
Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 05:14 +0200 schrieb Il Neofita: > On 9/9/07, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 09.09.2007, 20:16 +0200 schrieb Il Neofita: > > Well, it seems there are differences between those accounts > then. >

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange Behaviour

2007-09-09 Thread Il Neofita
On 9/9/07, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 09.09.2007, 20:16 +0200 schrieb Il Neofita: > > Well, it seems there are differences between those accounts then. > > You might want to post your sip.conf, and -if that is possible- the ATA > conf file; or at least

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange Behaviour

2007-09-09 Thread Anselm Martin Hoffmeister
Am Sonntag, den 09.09.2007, 20:16 +0200 schrieb Il Neofita: > Hi, > my ATA has two phones attached and the possibility to set different > accounts. > I put two account of my asterisk server, however, it is able to call > only with the second one in order to the sip.conf and the first it > gives me

[asterisk-users] Strange Behaviour

2007-09-09 Thread Il Neofita
Hi, my ATA has two phones attached and the possibility to set different accounts. I put two account of my asterisk server, however, it is able to call only with the second one in order to the sip.conf and the first it gives me 403. And idea how to solve it? _

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour on Asterisk 1.4.9 with Queues...

2007-08-31 Thread Jared Smith
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 11:38 -0500, Carlos Chavez wrote: > I am having a strange problem with an Asterisk server that has a small > 5 seat call center. While everything seems to be working properly I if > do a "core show channels" the server goes into a loop: I'm not sure what might cause th

[asterisk-users] Strange behaviour on Asterisk 1.4.9 with Queues...

2007-08-31 Thread Carlos Chavez
I am having a strange problem with an Asterisk server that has a small 5 seat call center. While everything seems to be working properly I if do a "core show channels" the server goes into a loop: pbxinsol*CLI> core show channels Channel Location State Applicatio

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-18 Thread Eric \"ManxPower\" Wieling
Check the value of DIALSTATUS then decide of you want to dial the 2nd number. See [macro-std-exten] in extensions.conf for an example of checking the value of DIALSTATUS. The only time you might want two Dial lines in a row is if you always, not matter what, want to dial the 2nd number. Il

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-18 Thread Il Neofita
Yes, but I would like to try a number and after to try a second one. Any Idea how to avoid this. On 2/18/07, Eric ManxPower Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: C F wrote: > Asterisk supports this directly by issuing the hangup command before > the answer command. However, when using an analog i

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-18 Thread Eric \"ManxPower\" Wieling
C F wrote: Asterisk supports this directly by issuing the hangup command before the answer command. However, when using an analog interface like FXO the line has no way of knowing you just hung up and will continue to ring, which asterisk will see as a new call. in my experience even when using

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-18 Thread C F
Asterisk supports this directly by issuing the hangup command before the answer command. However, when using an analog interface like FXO the line has no way of knowing you just hung up and will continue to ring, which asterisk will see as a new call. in my experience even when using a PRI if i d

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-18 Thread Tim Panton
On 15 Feb 2007, at 09:55, Yuan LIU wrote: From: "Il Neofita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 03:37:14 -0500 But I tought that hangup was suppose to close the call, however, is not the case and a really did not catch why. Now I see where the confusion comes from. Asterisk doesn'

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-15 Thread Il Neofita
Ok thank you a lot!!! On 2/15/07, Yuan LIU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From: "Il Neofita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 03:37:14 -0500 > >But I tought that hangup was suppose to close the call, however, is not the >case and a really did not catch why. Now I see where the confusio

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-15 Thread Yuan LIU
From: "Il Neofita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 03:37:14 -0500 But I tought that hangup was suppose to close the call, however, is not the case and a really did not catch why. Now I see where the confusion comes from. Asterisk doesn't really speak English - or Chinese for that

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-15 Thread Il Neofita
On 2/14/07, Yuan LIU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, you'll have to decide how you want to "hang up" the caller: Do you want him/her to be ignored, or to be told that you are not available (like an answering machine)? You also need to tell Asterisk how to determine if the next "invite" comes

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-14 Thread Yuan LIU
From: "Il Neofita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:37:52 -0500 This is the situation A call me at my provider 1 I am not home and I would like to transfer the call I do not pickup the call for some reason I would like to hangup the caller, however, my asterisk try again to call on

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-14 Thread Il Neofita
This is the situation A call me at my provider 1 I am not home and I would like to transfer the call I do not pickup the call for some reason I would like to hangup the caller, however, my asterisk try again to call on my mobile over and over I would like to stop it. Any idea? Thank you a lot.

RE: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-14 Thread Yuan LIU
From: "Il Neofita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:30:51 -0500 I have this simple context I am register to an external provider and when I am not home I would like to transfer the phone outside The problem that the call goes in loop I don't see any loop in records below? What

[asterisk-users] Strange behaviour with Dial cmd

2007-02-14 Thread Il Neofita
I have this simple context I am register to an external provider and when I am not home I would like to transfer the phone outside The problem that the call goes in loop I cannot understand why. Can you figure out my error? Thank you sip.conf register => user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/400 [inside]

Re: [asterisk-users] strange behaviour of a zaptel device SOLVED

2006-08-17 Thread Thomas Artner
Thomas Artner wrote: > Hi! > > I am working hard on getting a useful attented transfer. (The built-in > atxfer feature isnt useful - because of calls getting lost - has been > discussed a few months ago) > > I have all my analog phones on sipura boxes. With the flash hook i can > do such attended

[asterisk-users] strange behaviour of a zaptel device

2006-08-17 Thread Thomas Artner
Hi! I am working hard on getting a useful attented transfer. (The built-in atxfer feature isnt useful - because of calls getting lost - has been discussed a few months ago) I have all my analog phones on sipura boxes. With the flash hook i can do such attended transfers without problems now. But

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-03 Thread Eric \"ManxPower\" Wieling
Pablo Mora wrote: [outgoing] exten => 0,1,Dial,Zap/g1 exten => 0,2,Hangup exten => 0,102,Congestion You NEVER want Dial,Zap/g1 You If you want to just get an outside dialtone you ALWAYS want a trailing / Dial,Zap/g1/ -- Now accepting new clients in Birmingham, Atlanta, Huntsville, Chatt

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-03 Thread Eric \"ManxPower\" Wieling
Pablo Mora wrote: > Did you saw my dialplan? I don't think I would have to add r. You never want to add "r" option to Dial() ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options vis

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-03 Thread C F
Change: callprogress=yes To: callprogress=no Also when dialing over the Zap FXO ports make sure to add the ww before the DTMF digits so that your extension.conf reads like this: exten => 9,1,Dial(Zap/g1/ww9 ) On 8/3/06, Pablo Mora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok Here goes dialplan

[asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-03 Thread Pablo Mora
Ok     Here goes dialplan   [general] static=yes writeprotect=yes   [incoming] exten => s,1,Answer exten => s,2,Background(pbx) exten => s,3,Set(TIMEOUT(response)=5) exten => 1001,1,Dial,SIP/1001|20 exten => 1001,2,Hangup exten => 1001,102,Congestion,3 exten => 1002,1,Dial,

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-03 Thread C F
Can you please show your dialplan? with and withou the www? Please only the dialplan that doesnt work. Also include /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf On 8/3/06, Pablo Mora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CF, Adding www after Dial doesn't solve the trouble. I think we are talking the same but I don'

[asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-03 Thread Pablo Mora
CF,   Adding www after Dial doesn’t solve the trouble.   I think we are talking the same but I don’t express correctly.   Did you saw my dialplan? I don’t think I would have to add r.   Yes, I have installed a 4 FXO Card, with fxsks signalling. What I mean is I understand FXO doesn’

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-03 Thread C F
Yes, even with the r because the second it goes off hook it is answered. This is an FXO port. On 8/2/06, Jorge Mendoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Even if he has "r" in the dial plan? Jorge C F wrote: > Then you have something wrong some other place, if you are using an > FXO card then asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-02 Thread Jorge Mendoza
Even if he has "r" in the dial plan? Jorge C F wrote: > Then you have something wrong some other place, if you are using an > FXO card then asterisk is not even giving you the ring, the panasonic > is. > > On 8/2/06, Pablo Mora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> I think still didn't explai

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-02 Thread C F
Then you have something wrong some other place, if you are using an FXO card then asterisk is not even giving you the ring, the panasonic is. On 8/2/06, Pablo Mora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think still didn't explain me clearly… The problem is when I dial 0, in this case the asterisk t

[asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-02 Thread Pablo Mora
I think still didn’t explain me clearly…   The problem is when I dial 0, in this case the asterisk take Zap (connected directly to ext 200 from Panasonic), Panasonic gives tone, dial another extension (ie 100), the extension rings but when answer the phone asterisk keeps ringing… it doesn

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-01 Thread C F
You need to add a ww or 2 like this: exten => 101,1,Dial(Zap/g1/ww${EXTEN}) or like this: exten => 9,1,Dial(Zap/g1/ww9) Hope this helps. On 8/1/06, Pablo Mora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, I'm going to stop pictures I have a Digium 4 FXO Card in my asterisk, and connect to Panasonic

[asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-01 Thread Pablo Mora
Ok,   I’m going to stop pictures   I have a Digium 4 FXO Card in my asterisk, and connect to Panasonic through 2 extensions (configured in a pool)   This means when you dial 200 (example) in Panasonic, the call goes to asterisk and it answers.   In this sense, the answer is yes… rep

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-01 Thread Jorge Mendoza
Pablo, according to description I assume that you have an FXO at * connected to an FXS port at Panasonic. If this is correct, could you replace Asterisk by a telephone and see if it is possible to make call to Ext1? Jorge Pablo Mora wrote: > /Ok Ok, the figure doesn’t help./ > / / > /Here we go a

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-01 Thread C F
Again you are not saying how asterisk is connected to the panasonic, stop using pictures. On 8/1/06, Pablo Mora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok Ok, the figure doesn't help. Here we go again… - -- --- -- | SIP | - | ASTERISK | -- | PA

[asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-08-01 Thread Pablo Mora
Ok Ok, the figure doesn’t help. Here we go again…   -     --  ---   --| SIP | - | ASTERISK | -- | PANASONIC | --- | PSTN | -     --  ---   --      |   |

[asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-07-30 Thread Gary G. Hendershot
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 10:24 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232   Hello Pablo, I think you should decribe with details how are you routing the call between the SIP

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-07-29 Thread C F
How is asterisk connected to the Panasonic KX-TD1232? On 7/27/06, Pablo Mora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I've got asterisk running and almost working with Panasonic KX-TD1232 I said almost, because there's a strange behaviour when I make calls. ---

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-07-29 Thread Pablo L. Arturi
: [asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232 Hello,   I’ve got asterisk running and almost working with Panasonic KX-TD1232 I said almost, because there’s a strange behaviour when I make calls

[asterisk-users] Strange behaviour Panasonic KX-TD1232

2006-07-29 Thread Pablo Mora
Hello,   I’ve got asterisk running and almost working with Panasonic KX-TD1232 I said almost, because there’s a strange behaviour when I make calls.    ---  -  -   --- | SIP | -- | ASTERISK | -

Re: [Asterisk-Users] strange behaviour of asterisk sip.conf type=user vs type=peer

2005-10-25 Thread Gary Reuter
My guess is the problem is related to the reverse lookup of 147.135.20.128. sip.broadvoice.com = 147.135.20.128 147.135.20.128 = non-existant If you change your "host=sip.broadvoice.com" to "host=147.135.20.128" it'll probably work until they change the IP of their server Someone else who actua

[Asterisk-Users] strange behaviour of asterisk sip.conf type=user vs type=peer

2005-10-25 Thread Vikas
Hi, In sip.conf if type=peer then incoming calls from broadvoice are sent to context=incoming in the extension.conf file. But in sip.conf if type=user then we get the following messages in the packets being exchanged with broadvoice: 1. "Found no matching peer or user for '147.135.20.128:5060'" 2

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Strange behaviour with lost internet connection

2005-06-27 Thread Rob Thomas
Problem: > It seems the situation is improved when I remove the "regsiter => " > statements in my sip.conf. Cause: If your internet connection is down, your DNS isn't working. IF your DNS isn't working, it won't be able to resolve names. If it can't resolve a name, it will sit there trying until

[Asterisk-Users] Strange behaviour with lost internet connection

2005-06-27 Thread Ola Lidholm
I have noticed a strange behaviour when our internet connection was down a couple of hours last week. What happens is that asterisk starts running *really* slow. If I type "sip show peers" it sometimes responds correctly and shows all the connected peers, but sometimes I get an empty list (this se

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Strange behaviour using 7960

2004-07-20 Thread Stefan de Konink
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Brian D'Arcy wrote: > Anyone ever seen anything like this before? Yes, with a Grandstream over an ADSL (routed) line. I disabled the check, but the problem stil occured. And since this friends line was almost the lowest ping in the complete ISP network something else must be

[Asterisk-Users] Strange behaviour using 7960

2004-07-20 Thread Brian D'Arcy
Hello all, One of my remote employees is using a 7960 we sent him, on a public IP address at his home office. I've run pings and traceroutes both from the server to his phone, and from the cable modem to our server, there's never a high ping time, or a dropped packet, however about every 30 minut