Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-21 Thread Richard Mudgett
> Ok so I was not able to get the actual line in use from "core show > channels" anymore. > So I thought I would bit the bullet and just monitor events since > that > seemed like the thing > to do. After doing that I mad a call. > > Event: Newchannel > Privilege: call,all > Channel: DAHDI/i4/317XX

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-21 Thread Jerry Geis
Ok so I was not able to get the actual line in use from "core show channels" anymore. So I thought I would bit the bullet and just monitor events since that seemed like the thing to do. After doing that I mad a call. Event: Newchannel Privilege: call,all Channel: DAHDI/i4/317XXX ChannelStat

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
Just for grins, do you have a softphone like xlite that you can try the outgoing call on? I think it's an outgoing issue, not a polycom one. I do not have a softphone. I have a yealink VP-2009 and same behavior. Jerry -- _ --

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:56 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4 I have a little dialplan context now... [check-chanisavail] exten => s,1,ChanIsAvail(${agi_channel}) exten => s,n,System(/bin/echo ${AVAILC

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
I have a little dialplan context now... [check-chanisavail] exten => s,1,ChanIsAvail(${agi_channel}) exten => s,n,System(/bin/echo ${AVAILCHAN} > /tmp/${agi_file}) exten => s,n,Hangup() and a call file: Channel: Local/s@check-chanisavail/n Context: check-chanisavail Extension: s Priority: 1 Set

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
On 12/20/2012 01:00 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: IMO the local channel call should be the lowest overhead option available. What about: Action: Command Command: dahdi show channels I can just look to see if "Extension" has anyth

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
IMO the local channel call should be the lowest overhead option available. What about: Action: Command Command: dahdi show channels I can just look to see if "Extension" has anything for the Chan I am interested in? is

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Richard Mudgett
> You should just cache the AMI DAHDIChannel event information in your > program. > > If you really must you could use the CLI command "pri show channels". > However, it is not intended to be repeatedly run for performance > reasons. It blocks processing of ISDN messages while it is running. > I

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4 You should just cache the AMI DAHDIChannel event information in your program. If you really must you could use the CLI command "pri show channels". However, it is not intended to be repeatedly run for performance reasons.

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
You should just cache the AMI DAHDIChannel event information in your program. If you really must you could use the CLI command "pri show channels". However, it is not intended to be repeatedly run for performance reasons. It blocks processing of ISDN messages while it is running. I am not con

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Richard Mudgett
> It is > Action: ExtensionState > Exten: 5551212 > Context: fubar > > This will return the status of the dialplan exten hint. > > > and > Action: Command > Command: ChanIsAvail > Parameters: DAHDI/1 > > > > says Error > No such command "ChanIsAvail" ChanIsAvail is a > > dialplan application not

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
M To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4 It is Action: ExtensionState Exten: 5551212 Context: fubar This will return the status of the dialplan exten hint. > and > Action: Command > Command: ChanIsAvail &g

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
It is Action: ExtensionState Exten: 5551212 Context: fubar This will return the status of the dialplan exten hint. >/ and />/ Action: Command />/ Command: ChanIsAvail />/ Parameters: DAHDI/1 />/ />/ says Error />/ No such command "ChanIsAvail" / ChanIsAvail is a dialplan application not a

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Richard Mudgett
> This was a change in v1.8 and is documented in the v1.8 UPGRADE.txt > file: > > * The PRI channels in chan_dahdi can no longer change the channel > name if a > different B channel is selected during call negotiation. To > prevent using > the channel name to infer what B channel a call is

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
This was a change in v1.8 and is documented in the v1.8 UPGRADE.txt file: * The PRI channels in chan_dahdi can no longer change the channel name if a different B channel is selected during call negotiation. To prevent using the channel name to infer what B channel a call is using and to av

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-19 Thread Richard Mudgett
> In 1.4.43 I would see things from "core show channels" like > DAHDI/18/x > for line 18 > > in Asterisk 11 its > DAHDI/i4/ > > How do I get the line number back? This was a change in v1.8 and is documented in the v1.8 UPGRADE.txt file: * The PRI channels in chan_dahdi can no longer cha

[asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-19 Thread Jerry Geis
In 1.4.43 I would see things from "core show channels" like DAHDI/18/x for line 18 in Asterisk 11 its DAHDI/i4/ How do I get the line number back? Jerry -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digit