Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec over SIP Trunk between CCM and Asterisk

Thanks for reply Leandro. We have installed g279 codec in Asterisk box.Even if not so, there is no problem outgoing (from Asterisk to CCM) calls. But after i searched the issue, i figured out that CCM 4.x does not let g729 codec to pass through over SIP trunk. This is limited only in CCM. If we c

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec over SIP Trunk between CCM and Asterisk

2013/1/17 Onur Cem Çelebi > Hello, > > My problem is, outgoing calls (from asterisk to CCM) work fine but > incoming (from CCM to Asterisk) does not work because of CCM is trying to > use g729 over SIP trunk. I have found that link after a quick search. > Problem is the same as in link below (How

[asterisk-users] g729 codec over SIP Trunk between CCM and Asterisk

Hello, My problem is, outgoing calls (from asterisk to CCM) work fine but incoming (from CCM to Asterisk) does not work because of CCM is trying to use g729 over SIP trunk. I have found that link after a quick search. Problem is the same as in link below (However my Asterisk version is 1.8.13) and

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec loading

Thank you Moises it works perfectly. On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Moises Silva wrote: > Try disabling SELinux if you have it enabled (unless of course you need > it). I seem to remember there is certain compilation flags required > (position independent code, -fPIC?) to run with SELinux e

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec loading

Try disabling SELinux if you have it enabled (unless of course you need it). I seem to remember there is certain compilation flags required (position independent code, -fPIC?) to run with SELinux enabled, may be the codec_g729a.so is not compiled properly to run under such circumstances? Moises Si

[asterisk-users] g729 codec loading

Hello Everyone, I've successfully registered my g729a licenses. When i try to load the module from asterisk Cli i got the following error *Error loading module 'codec_g729a.so': /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_g729a.so: cannot restore segment prot after reloc: Permissi

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 codec

Dear Sir, kindly find below my CPU info...I just need which package should i install [r...@switch1 modules]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz stepping: 5 cpu MHz

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 codec

On 1/19/2009 12:03, michel freiha wrote: > Dear All, > > I have the following CPU info on my asterisk server: > > Linux switch1.domain.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 > #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > I need to install G729 on the asterisk server

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 codec

hi just for pass through you dont need any codec... 2009/1/19 michel freiha > Dear All, > > I have the following CPU info on my asterisk server: > > Linux switch1.domain.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST > 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > I need to install G729 on the aster

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 codec

- Original Message - From: michel freiha To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion ; asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 7:03 AM Subject: [asterisk-users] G729 codec Dear All, I have the following CPU info on my asterisk server

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 codec

Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] G729 codec 1)--Download G729 modules compatible with cpu model and asterisk version http://asterisk.hosting.lv/ 2)--Change module rename to codec_g729.so copy to /usr/lib/asterisk/modules set permission 755 3)-- restart asterisk coonect to

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 codec

please attach: cat /proc/cpuinfo 2009/1/19 michel freiha > Dear All, > > I have the following CPU info on my asterisk server: > > Linux switch1.domain.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST > 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > I need to install G729 on the asterisk server just to

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 codec

ation' From: michel freiha To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion ; asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:33:38 PM Subject: [asterisk-users] G729 codec Dear All, I have the following CPU info on m

[asterisk-users] G729 codec

Dear All, I have the following CPU info on my asterisk server: Linux switch1.domain.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I need to install G729 on the asterisk server just to pass through and not for encoding...Which G729 package do you advice me to

[asterisk-users] G729 codec files

Which of these files is best for a Core2 Duo? I'm not sure whether to choose Pentium or i686. http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/codec_g729/asterisk-1.4/x86-32/ ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec for asterisk-1.6.0?

Paul Belanger wrote: > Anybody have success with Digium's G729 codec and asterisk 1.6.0? Asterisk 1.6.0 has not yet been released; you must be referring to 1.6.0-beta9. > Reading > http://www.russellbryant.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/05/codec_g729-v34-builds-now-available/ > is seems they are bu

[asterisk-users] g729 codec for asterisk-1.6.0?

List, Anybody have success with Digium's G729 codec and asterisk 1.6.0? Reading http://www.russellbryant.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/05/codec_g729-v34-builds-now-available/ is seems they are build for 1.6 and trunk. But all I could find / use is 1.4 builds from http://downloads.digium.com/pub/tel

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec - simultaneous calls

On Jan 14, 2008 7:04 AM, Naveen Palani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I use asterisk 1.4.11 version for making outbound calls. Running it on > linux(fedora core 7) machine. Recently purchased the g729 codec, got it > registered with my asterisk box. I have two queries for you to help me. >

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec - simultaneous calls

Naveen Palani wrote: > Hi, > > I use asterisk 1.4.11 version for making outbound calls. Running it on > linux(fedora core 7) machine. Recently purchased the g729 codec, got it > registered with my asterisk box. I have two queries for you to help me. > > 1. How do i know when an outbound call is

[asterisk-users] g729 codec - simultaneous calls

Hi, I use asterisk 1.4.11 version for making outbound calls. Running it on linux(fedora core 7) machine. Recently purchased the g729 codec, got it registered with my asterisk box. I have two queries for you to help me. 1. How do i know when an outbound call is placed that it makes use of the g7

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

lmisoft.com Advanced Billing for Asterisk PBX *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Fernando Berretta *Sent:* Monday, November 26, 2007 6:01 PM *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

>> >> >> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of >> *Fernando Berretta >> *Sent:* Monday, November 26, 2007 6:01 PM >> *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion >> *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users]

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

Well one of them should work fine ;) . I was not sure if it required .so extension ( i guess it doesnt ) anyway hitting tab can autocomplete or atleast give hints . Looks like he is loading wrong module bcoz asterisk autoloads this on restart if placed in proper directory with proper permissions :

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 03:00:19AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > asterisk -rx "module load codec_g729.so" or "module load codec_g729" and > shhow translation recalc You ca't really fix a typo without intrducing a new one, eh? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EM

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > *On Behalf Of *Fernando Berretta > *Sent:* Monday, November 26, 2007 6:01 PM > *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core > processor 4000 + CENTOS

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

>> I've already download the folowing files for testing >> >> codec_g729-ast14-gcc4-glibc-athlon-sse.so >> codec_g729-ast14-gcc4-glibc-core2.so >> codec_g729-ast14-icc-glibc-x86_64-core2.so >> >> But... no one of them seems to be working core2 is for Intel Core2 processors, not for AMD. check

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

*Sent:* Monday, November 26, 2007 6:01 PM *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4 Dear Mindaugas, I've already download the folowing files for testing

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fernando Berretta Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 6:01 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4 Dear Min

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

27 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4 Hi, I'm trying to install g729 codec in an Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000+ but.. all packages I've download

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

Fernando Berretta wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to install g729 codec in an Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor > 4000+ but.. all packages I've download haven't worked. Could someone > please let me know what package should I download ? Did you register it? It is not free to use. Ugo

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

, 2007 3:27 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4 Hi, I'm trying to install g729 codec in an Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000+ but.. all packages I've downlo

[asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

Hi, I'm trying to install g729 codec in an Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000+ but.. all packages I've download haven't worked. Could someone please let me know what package should I download ? Best Regards, Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] modules]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_i

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec

On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 09:12:54AM -0400, Kevin Smith wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Simple question that I haven't been able to find a direct answer to. We > currently have call recording with our asterisk system. The files, I am > assuming since that is the codec we are using, are being recorded in

[asterisk-users] g729 codec

Hi everyone, Simple question that I haven't been able to find a direct answer to. We currently have call recording with our asterisk system. The files, I am assuming since that is the codec we are using, are being recorded in the g729 codec. Is there a way to listen to these calls, say on windo

[asterisk-users] G729 codec problems

I have a system that has had 5 G729 licenses for over a year and I've come to install the v31 G729 codec from the Digium ftp server but it won't see the license. Does anyone know how to get around this problem? It is registered and I do have newer systems running this v31 version of the codec but

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec help

programming dept wrote: What happens is that if we terminate calls to carriers who accept only the g729 codec we get a 503 service unavailable. are you sure that your carrier will accept g.729? Sometimes they don't accept under iax2 and do accept under sip... check your debug for more informa

[asterisk-users] g729 codec help

Hi, We added more g729 licenses today that we bought from digium on Friday. Since we had previously installed their licenses and had them running we just ran the register command along with the new key that was given to us. After we restarted asterisk NONE of the g729's worked even though if we do

[asterisk-users] g729 Codec for AMD Sempron

Hi group,Can anyone help out in selecting the right codec to download from the digium site.Im using an AMD Sempron 2800+ CPU speed 1.6 GhzThanks in advanceDan ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-us

[asterisk-users] g729 Codec for AMD Sempron

Hi group,Can anyone help out in selecting the right codec to download from the digium site.Im using an AMD Sempron 2800+ CPU speed 1.6 GhzThanks in advanceDan ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-user

[asterisk-users] G729 Codec Loading Error

Hi,   I just registed my digium licence and I received the successful message after the registration process. However, When I load Asterisk, I’m getting this error :   [format_g729.so] => (Raw G729 data)   == Registered file format g729, extension(s) g729  [codec_g729a.so]Oct  2 01:2

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

I think I sort of solved the problem. It is related to Voipstunt provider. I tried it today with another provider and all is fine. Well, I get some warnings from G729 like: Jun 26 09:28:45 NOTICE[8440]: frame.c:179 __ast_smoother_feed: Dropping extra frame of G.729 since we already have a VAD frame

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 12:55:13PM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Steve Kennedy wrote: > > Each channel needs TWO licenses, one for each way (I think). > Nope. The encoder/decoder licenses are counted separately, and each > license you purchase entitles you to one encoder and one decoder. Hmm,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

Hi, I wonder if VoIP providers consume two licenses when one calls via them? One license for my phone to the provider and one license when call is passed to the recepient. Is that possible? Rudolf On 4/3/06, Kevin P. Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Kennedy wrote: > > > Each channel n

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

Steve Kennedy wrote: > Each channel needs TWO licenses, one for each way (I think). Nope. The encoder/decoder licenses are counted separately, and each license you purchase entitles you to one encoder and one decoder. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation prov

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:32:09AM +1000, RumaTech wrote: > Sorry, I was "out of action" for some time. > I am using Voipstnt to plae calls to USA/Canada and I bouhj 1 copy og G.729. > This was mainly to get one of the local Australians VoIP providers working. Each channel needs TWO licenses, one

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

Or, could he be seeing an outstanding issue with counting (eg, start with 0 or 1)? Seems like that might be the case. I've got about ten g729 licenses and never see any warning messages, but then again this is a small system and I don't think I could consume all of them if I tried. Alyed Tzo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

Rudolf Ladyzhenskii wrote: > I am not. I have one license and use i channel. > It seems to detect the fact there are no more channels left and keeps > warning me about it in case I want to use more. I reviewed the code for that module after reading your original message, and confirmed that it will

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

I used g729 couple of times in the past and got the warning messages ONLY when I was trying to use more channels than the total amount of licenses I'd got.If you are sure you are using only one device that needs the license, I would suggest to check out how it is communicating with Asterisk. Al

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

I am not. I have one license and use i channel. It seems to detect the fact there are no more channels left and keeps warning me about it in case I want to use more. It is fine, but the warning is constant. All you see on Asterisk console is running warning message. Rudolf On 4/2/06, Kevin P. Fl

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

RumaTech wrote: > And it keeps running like that. Call usually come through OK. If i try > to use "show g729" command, it shows that all codecs are in use. Well, > this is fine, I am using one, but I do not want to see those warnings. > Once is quite enough. Those continuos warnings make it imposs

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

ing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 8:14 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems What sort of call path are you trying to get working? Paul Hales Technical Manager AsteriskIT - Original Message - From: "Rudolf Ladyzhenskii" &

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

0:18 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems > Hi, all > > I have a license for G.729A codec from Digium. > > When asterisk starts it shows: > Jun 17 21:13:59 NOTICE[4040]: codec_g729.c:460 load_module: G.729 > transcoding module Copyright (C) 1999-2005 Digium, Inc. &

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

m. - Gabe - Original Message - From: "Rudolf Ladyzhenskii" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 4:18 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems Hi, all I have a license for G.729A codec f

[Asterisk-Users] G729 codec problems

Hi, all I have a license for G.729A codec from Digium. When asterisk starts it shows: Jun 17 21:13:59 NOTICE[4040]: codec_g729.c:460 load_module: G.729 transcoding module Copyright (C) 1999-2005 Digium, Inc. Jun 17 21:13:59 NOTICE[4040]: codec_g729.c:461 load_module: This module is supplied under

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

The best choice is with digium store itself. www.digium.com On 11/03/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > Can some one advice that where can we get the best price G729 codec can can > work smoothly with > Asterisk? > > > > ___

[Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

Hi all, Can some one advice that where can we get the best price G729 codec can can work smoothly with Asterisk? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://l

[Asterisk-Users] g729 codec for Windows Media Player?

Hello, Does anyone know of a native g729 codec for Windows that allows Windows Media Player to play .g729 files? Any info or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Timothy Karl ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://l

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

l Discussion" Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 4:55 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec Nope. The floating point vs fixed point thing is something that has no effect on the ordinary user. It is a matter of the internal implementation of the codec, and the type of processors on which

RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

Steve, Do you know if Digium's implementation has any of those features? I was not able to find any tech info about it. > There are Annexes up to I. The earlier versions are fixed point, reduced > complexity fixed point and floating point at 8kbps. These are all > compatible. Later annexes add

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

- Original Message - From: "Steve Underwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 5:14 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec Ivan Meic (Vox Mundi) wrote: Actually G.729A is a reduced comp

RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

> Original Message > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec > From: "todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, May 25, 2005 11:59 am > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > > > Steve > Trying

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

ROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 5:14 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec Ivan Meic (Vox Mundi) wrote: Actually G.729A is a reduced complexity version, and G.729B is a version with silence suppression. The dat

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

Ivan Meic (Vox Mundi) wrote: Actually G.729A is a reduced complexity version, and G.729B is a version with silence suppression. The data rate while sending voice is exactly the same, although the quality of G.729B should be a little higher. However the average rate for B can be lower if the si

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

Ivan Meic (Vox Mundi) wrote: Actually G.729A is a reduced complexity version, and G.729B is a version with silence suppression. The data rate while sending voice is exactly the same, although the quality of G.729B should be a little higher. However the average rate for B can be lower if the sil

RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

>Actually G.729A is a reduced complexity version, and G.729B is a version >with silence suppression. The data rate while sending voice is exactly >the same, although the quality of G.729B should be a little higher. >However the average rate for B can be lower if the silence suppression >is used

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

t; To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 5:20 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec Actually G.729A is a reduced complexity version, and G.729B is a version with silence suppression. The data rate while sending voice is exact

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

wrote: - Original Message - From: "todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 12:34 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec Andrew Thanks for the reply- Forgive my ignorance in this area but fr

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

Commercial Discussion" Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 12:34 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec Andrew Thanks for the reply- Forgive my ignorance in this area but from what I have been told by the client was that G.729 b used less over all bandwidth on average ) then G.729 A. Correct me if

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

- Original Message - From: "todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 12:34 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec Andrew Thanks for the reply- Forgive my ignorance in this

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

On May 22, 2005 04:46 pm, todd wrote: > Thanks for the info: do you know if the g729 codec for Asterisk is limited > to only the G.729A version. Is there G.729 B available for Asterisk? Does it matter? g729 has fixed-point and floating-point implementations. The data coming out the back end is

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

nt: Sunday, May 22, 2005 11:16 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec At the cli prompt type “show codecs”. In the right hand column it states G.729A. Sincerely; Gary Lawrence ITcom.Net 866.4ITcom1 866.448.2661 -Original Message-From: [EMAIL

RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec   Hi all I have a question  and hope it has not been answered before. I have searched the forums and mail but have not seen this answered conclusively. Does the G729 codec and licenses which digium sales for asterisk use g729 a

[Asterisk-Users] G729 codec

Hi allI have a question  and hope it has not been answered before. I have searched the forums and mail but have not seen this answered conclusively.Does the G729 codec and licenses which digium sales for asterisk use g729 aor b or both; I have had a hard time getting a conclusive answer. If

[Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec Licensing

Hi, I'm just trying to register our codecs but it keeps giving the following error. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/home#chmod 777 register [EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/home#./register ELF binary type "0" not known. ./register: Exec format error. Binary file not executable. Any ideas? Cheers, Sahil _

RE: [Asterisk-Users] g729 codec

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Aug 26 16:53:16 NOTICE[-239408208]: frame.c:120 > ast_smoother_feed: Dropping extra frame of G.729 since we > already have a VAD frame at the end I'm also seeing this message streaming in the CLI. I think it might have something to do with endpoints misbehaving when t

[Asterisk-Users] g729 codec

hello I´ve got 10 G729 codec licenses and i am getting the following error using sip channel Aug 26 16:53:16 NOTICE[-239408208]: frame.c:120 ast_smoother_feed: Dropping extra frame of G.729 since we already have a VAD frame at the end can someone tell me what's going on?? thanks ___

[Asterisk-Users] g729 Codec on Max OS X

Hey All, Just wondering if there is a version of the G729 Codec available for Mac OSX? I can see almost all the x86 infrastructures ... Regards Darryl -- Darryl Ross Senior Network Engineer OEG Australia Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 08 81228363 Office: 08 81226361 If you want to live up to the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Steve Underwood wrote: > It would probably help if you understood what that table means. It is > very misleading. G.729 has features to mitigate the awfulness of a lost > packet. It has nothing to help conceal lost packets really well. What I > said is correct. If you fudg

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

This certainly explains why we get terrible audio at 10% packet loss between Asterisk servers between 2 end points using iLBC, but if we use 2 SPA2000s using G.729 to commincate directly with each other (and having the same 10% packet loss), they sound pretty good. We had been trying to figu

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec+packet loss concealment

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 05:47:59 -0400 Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 03 August 2004 02:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > From what I have heard, Asterisk does not allow for > iLBC to > > take advantage of the lost packet concealment. > > I understand this has something to d

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

Andres wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Steve Underwood wrote: Eh? G.729 has no particular features to allow more effective packet loss concealment. iLBC has, but at the cost of a substantially higher bit rate. In fact G.711 is a little ahead of G.729 in the regard, since p

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Steve Underwood wrote: Eh? G.729 has no particular features to allow more effective packet loss concealment. iLBC has, but at the cost of a substantially higher bit rate. In fact G.711 is a little ahead of G.729 in the regard, since packets are com

RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec+packet loss concealment

If this works, wouldn't it fix the problem using silence supression as well -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Walsh Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 11:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec+packet

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

Adam Hart wrote: Steve Underwood wrote: Adam Hart wrote: Daniel Niasoff wrote: Is G729 more sensitive to packet loss or delays due to it’s higher compression. If I’ve generally got the bandwidth available, am I best sticking to ulaw. G.729 has lost packet concealment, G.711 doesn't. G.711 will s

RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec+packet loss concealment

Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > My qualification is having worked on the IAX2 jitter buffer, > > consequently having studied how audio flows from the received frames > > through the jitter buffer and then via ast_translate() into the codec. > > > Hmm... hav

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec+packet loss concealment

On Tuesday 03 August 2004 07:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am the source for that statement. Is that a problem? ;-) Not at all. :-) But I do thank you for taking the time to write a few paragraphs explaining what's going on in the current code. It's certainly something I didn't know befor

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec+packet loss concealment

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: > On Tuesday 03 August 2004 02:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From what I have heard, Asterisk does not allow for iLBC to > > take advantage of the lost packet concealment. > > I understand this has something to do with the jitter > > processing. >

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec+packet loss concealment

On Tuesday 03 August 2004 02:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From what I have heard, Asterisk does not allow for iLBC to > take advantage of the lost packet concealment. > I understand this has something to do with the jitter > processing. Can you provide a source for that statement? I am not disp

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Steve Underwood wrote: > Eh? G.729 has no particular features to allow more effective packet loss > concealment. iLBC has, but at the cost of a substantially higher bit > rate. In fact G.711 is a little ahead of G.729 in the regard, since > packets are completely independa

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec+packet loss concealment

Hi >From what I have heard, Asterisk does not allow for iLBC to take advantage of the lost packet concealment. I understand this has something to do with the jitter processing. If lost packet concealment doesnt work with ilbc, I can assume the same applies to other codecs who claim to have this f

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

Steve Underwood wrote: Adam Hart wrote: Daniel Niasoff wrote: Is G729 more sensitive to packet loss or delays due to it’s higher compression. If I’ve generally got the bandwidth available, am I best sticking to ulaw. G.729 has lost packet concealment, G.711 doesn't. G.711 will sound better othe

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

Adam Hart wrote: Daniel Niasoff wrote: Hi Everyone, Is G729 more sensitive to packet loss or delays due to it’s higher compression. If I’ve generally got the bandwidth available, am I best sticking to ulaw. G.729 has lost packet concealment, G.711 doesn't. G.711 will sound better otherwise i

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

Daniel Niasoff wrote: Hi Everyone, Is G729 more sensitive to packet loss or delays due to it’s higher compression. If I’ve generally got the bandwidth available, am I best sticking to ulaw. Thanks Daniel Niasoff Neither G.729 or ulaw have any strong features to help with packet loss concealment

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

Daniel Niasoff wrote: Hi Everyone, Is G729 more sensitive to packet loss or delays due to it’s higher compression. If I’ve generally got the bandwidth available, am I best sticking to ulaw. G.729 has lost packet concealment, G.711 doesn't. G.711 will sound better otherwise if you can afford

[Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

Hi Everyone,   Is G729 more sensitive to packet loss or delays due to it’s higher compression. If I’ve generally got the bandwidth available, am I best sticking to ulaw.   Thanks   Daniel Niasoff

Re: [Asterisk-Users] g729 codec compatibility voiceage vs Digium

I own a G729b codec from voiceage which I had from Digium a couple of months ago , I friend of mine had the new Digium G729 codec which registers in the asterisk as a Annex A/B codec, the problem that we saw is that the call goes thru find but we cannot here any sound. Asterisk is showing this :

[Asterisk-Users] g729 codec compatibility voiceage vs Digium

I own a G729b codec from voiceage which I had from Digium a couple of months ago , I friend of mine had the new Digium G729 codec which registers in the asterisk as a Annex A/B codec, the problem that we saw is that the call goes thru find but we cannot here any sound. Asterisk is showing t

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec for asterisk

Hi! > Yes - you can get g729 support but you have to pay on a per channel basis - > > If you have say 30 phones you could probably get buy w/ 25 licences. > The licenses limit the concurent number of g729 sessions. Make sure you have a clear picture of "channel" vs. "phone conversation"! Chee

RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec for asterisk

Adam Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Kevin Walsh wrote: > > brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > No you MUST pay per channel because the patent holders require that. > > > The patent holders would [EMAIL PROTECTED] kittens if you had no port limit or > > > any > > > type of control on it. That's

Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 codec for asterisk

Kevin Walsh wrote: brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've seen that licenses are purchased on a per-channel basis. Could we make some sort of agreement on having a no-limit channel license? Even, we would like to have the possibility of installing it on how many machines we wish to do. No you MUST pay

  1   2   >