Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

David fire wrote: > you are soamming my mail box whit this useless discution > the solution is doble posting (top and bottom) > > 2008/12/17 Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) > > > On December 17, 2008 05:03:00 pm Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: > > To me top posting is l

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Darryl Dunkin wrote: > Steve Edwards wrote: > Top posting. Bottom posting. Honestly, if you can't use an effing > scrollbar, please tell me so I can take you out back and beat you to > death with something heavy. The .5 seconds it takes to scroll from one > end of a message to

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On December 17, 2008 06:59:19 pm David fire wrote: > you are soamming my mail box whit this useless discution > the solution is doble posting (top and bottom) It's a public mailing list. If you're having trouble managing it, you may want to try a digest version, or perhaps a moderated list. -A.

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

on topic. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of SIP Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 15:44 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

you are soamming my mail box whit this useless discution the solution is doble posting (top and bottom) 2008/12/17 Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) > On December 17, 2008 05:03:00 pm Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: > > To me top posting is like people talking about "SIP Trunks". There is > > no such th

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On December 17, 2008 05:03:00 pm Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: > To me top posting is like people talking about "SIP Trunks". There is > no such thing as a "SIP Trunk". There are SIP connections, peers, > friends, etc. The term is simply a marketing buzzword to make people > that don't know mu

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Steve Edwards wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Danny Nicholas wrote: > > >> OSUR GONNA BE ABLE TO MAKE PEOPLE STOP POSTING. IF DIGIUM GETS ENOUGH OF >> THESE STUPID HITS, THEY WILL CUT THIS OFF. I KNOW I'M SHOUTING, I'M >> @#$###$# TIRED OF INTERRUPTING IMPORTANT WORK TO READ NOTHING. THAT'S WHA

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

RE Kushner List Account wrote: > Paul Hales wrote: > >>> In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't >>> repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time >>> a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! >>> >>> >>> >>> >> I am strongly

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Danny Nicholas wrote: > OSUR GONNA BE ABLE TO MAKE PEOPLE STOP POSTING. IF DIGIUM GETS ENOUGH OF > THESE STUPID HITS, THEY WILL CUT THIS OFF. I KNOW I'M SHOUTING, I'M > @#$###$# TIRED OF INTERRUPTING IMPORTANT WORK TO READ NOTHING. THAT'S WHAT > MSN IS FOR. Spoken like a t

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Paul Hales wrote: >> In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't >> repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time >> a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! >> >> >> > I am strongly against anyone posting anything with their bottom. > >

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

> > In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't > repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time > a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! > > I am strongly against anyone posting anything with their bottom. later, PaulH __

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Bill Andersen wrote: > In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't > repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time > a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! > > ./bill > > Posting either way can be good, bad, or

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

risk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eberhard Roloff Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 4:18 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] On 12/17/2008 Eric "ManxPower" Wieling

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On 12/17/2008 Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: > You're not going to be able to make people stop top posting and I'm > not > going to be able to make people stop using wrong or misleading terms > like "SIP Trunk". If you try all you are going to do is piss people > off > and stress yourself ou

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Barry L. Kline wrote: > Bill Andersen wrote: > >> In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't >> repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time >> a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! >> >> ./bill > > Not when you take the time to properly t

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 07:03:15PM -0200, David fire wrote: > 2008/12/17 Barry L. Kline > > > Bill Andersen wrote: > > > > > In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't > > > repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time > > > a question is asked either... Bottom p

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

2008/12/17 Barry L. Kline > Bill Andersen wrote: > > > In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't > > repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time > > a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! > > > > ./bill > > Not when you take the time to pr

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Bill Andersen wrote: > In the "order in which people normally read text" they don't > repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time > a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad! > > ./bill Not when you take the time to properly trim your reply it's not. BK _

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Gergo Csibra Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 8:41 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was:

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

oxSports. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Thomas Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 2:59 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] Well, it seems th

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David fire Sent: 06 December 2008 03:12 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] is enougth of this pointless topic... you are spammers now... 2008/12/6 Bob Gu

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 05:25:59AM +0200, Atis Lezdins wrote: > GMail webinterface does automatically hides quotations. I expect that > other mail clients are following. apt-get install t-prot The /ignore for top-posters :-) -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[E

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Bob Gustafson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I notice that someone has started a bottom post, I will follow. But, > if I am the first, I will top post. > > When I look at a new email, I don't like to scroll to the bottom to find > out what is new. > > If you know of

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

is enougth of this pointless topic... you are spammers now... 2008/12/6 Bob Gustafson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If I notice that someone has started a bottom post, I will follow. But, > if I am the first, I will top post. > > When I look at a new email, I don't like to scroll to the bottom to find >

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

If I notice that someone has started a bottom post, I will follow. But, if I am the first, I will top post. When I look at a new email, I don't like to scroll to the bottom to find out what is new. If you know of a mail reader which will automatically scroll to the top of the latest info, let me

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

I like the discussion, I doubt it will end. I prefer top posting because I reply to all my customers that way, my mail client isn't that smart and I think technology should meet the needs rather than force you to adopt work arounds. I can fully understand though others preferring it, but I don'

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

ssion Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] At 09:11 AM 12/5/2008, you wrote: I realize that not everyone sees it that way, but maybe it throws a different perspective in the mix. Personally I rarely read bottom pos

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

, telnet, teletype or CRT terminals for email and what not. I say, end it Bart - Original Message - From: Ira To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

At 09:11 AM 12/5/2008, you wrote: I realize that not everyone sees it that way, but maybe it throws a different perspective in the mix. Personally I rarely read bottom posted messages. I've already read the rest of it and after so many times scrolling to the bottom to see "I agree", I rarely both

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

makes sense On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 7:59 PM, David fire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i have the solution so every one is happy i will write over and below :- ) > > 2008/12/5 Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> On Friday 05 December 2008 11:11:33 Wilton Helm wrote: >> > I guess there is a var

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Friday 05 December 2008 11:57:56 Don Kelly wrote: > Tilghman wrote > > > ...will you ask your question in accordance with the rules that were set > > out in advance...? > > Where can we review these rules? This one is as good as any: http://db.tidbits.com/article/5386 Note the publication date

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:11:33AM -0700, Wilton Helm wrote: > I guess there is a variety of opinions on this, some of which relates > to the tools a person is using. The absolutely most offensive thing > to me in a post is to have to scroll through a bunch of copied > original material that I'

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

i have the solution so every one is happy i will write over and below :- ) 2008/12/5 Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Friday 05 December 2008 11:11:33 Wilton Helm wrote: > > I guess there is a variety of opinions on this, some of which relates to > > the tools a person is using. The abs

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Tilghman wrote > ...will you ask your question in accordance with the rules that were set > out in advance...? Where can we review these rules? --Don ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailin

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Friday 05 December 2008 11:11:33 Wilton Helm wrote: > I guess there is a variety of opinions on this, some of which relates to > the tools a person is using. The absolutely most offensive thing to me in > a post is to have to scroll through a bunch of copied original material > that I've alread

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

I guess there is a variety of opinions on this, some of which relates to the tools a person is using. The absolutely most offensive thing to me in a post is to have to scroll through a bunch of copied original material that I've already read six times to get to the new part. My own preference

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

H, not sure about you but I often pick up a book and flick from the back to the front, does nobody else do that? On 05/12/2008, Atis Lezdins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> >> Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> >> Top

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > Top posting strikes again: > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:39:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Quote : "Like I said earlier - the CDR's aren't > reliable enough for a billing

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

-->> Sent: 05 December 2008 14:41 -->> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion -->> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] -->> -->> Friday, December 5, 2008, 2:49:59 PM, Andrew wrote: -->> -->>

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Friday, December 5, 2008, 2:49:59 PM, Andrew wrote: > Address added to spam filter. Please do NOT e-mail me again. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? -- Best

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] - Or was it top posting?

--Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mr Gabriel Sent: 05 December 2008 14:05 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] - Or was it top posting? - Origin

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] - Or was it top posting?

- Original Message - From: "Mr Gabriel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Friday, 5 December, 2008 13:58:09 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

- Original Message - From: "Andrew Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Friday, 5 December, 2008 13:49:59 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Address added to spam filter. Please do NOT e-mail me again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: 05 December 2008 13:27 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Top posting strikes again: On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:39:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quote : "Like I said earlier - the CDR's aren't reliable enough for a billing platform (as you've rightly pointed out) but are OK for very basic call logging (something the

[asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Top posting strikes again: On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:39:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quote : "Like I said earlier - the CDR's aren't > reliable enough for a billing platform (as you've > rightly pointed out) but are OK for very basic call > logging (something the customer can look at)