ECTED] Behalf Of William
Suffill
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 11:54 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phones, bluetooth and general
happiness
Interesting. I think either the phonelabs adapter or cellsocket might
be an interesting ide
Hi,
As I am the developer of DIAX
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Rozman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
there is already iax softphone called diax
(http://www.laser.com/dante/diax/diax.html) that can be controlled over
bluetooth on some phones. The thing that is missing is to be able to use
cellu
PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phones, bluetooth and
> general happiness
>
>
> Jay Milk wrote:
> > That's exactly it! The asterisk box acts as a handset for
> the phone
> > and uses AT-
Yep, right on -- once it's a channel, you can run any extension you like
-- including your IVR prompts and voicemail. Whether your extensions
are SIP, H.323 or zaptel won't even matter.
> -Original Message-
> From: Damjan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 5:07
> ON: Why would one prefer bluetooth over wires if one still needs a
> serial cable to send AT commands?
You can send AT commands via BT too... while sending audio.
BT is a great standard.
> For an incomming call, GSM to
> GSM-Asterisk it would make sense, but I never saw a bluetooth headset
Jay Milk wrote:
That's exactly it! The asterisk box acts as a handset for the phone and
uses AT-commands for call-origination and progress.
OFF: Although the reversed thing, having a console with a bluetooth
headset would also sounds very ok.
ON: Why would one prefer bluetooth over wires if one
Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phones, bluetooth and
> general happiness
>
>
> > As for how BT transmits Audio:
> >
> > www.bluetooth.org
> > www.bluez.org
> >
> > How Linux utilizes Bluetooth:
> > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8
> As for how BT transmits Audio:
>
> www.bluetooth.org
> www.bluez.org
>
> How Linux utilizes Bluetooth:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=linux+bluetooth
> www.bluez.org
>
> For how to write a channel, I suppose a seasoned linux programmer would
> know by looking at the sources fo
To: Jay Milk
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List -
> Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phones, bluetooth and
> general happiness
>
>
> > cell-socket. I'd prefer a bluetooth dongle (1) because of
> cost, an
ing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phones, bluetooth and
> general happiness
>
>
> Hi :)
> I have do same test with Nokia 3650 (bluetooth) and Motorola
> A835 (bluetooth and USB)
>
> I have do a log of widcomm software and I can setup a col
Interesting. I think either the phonelabs adapter or cellsocket might
be an interesting idea. We are moving to a biz mobile package I use
iax2 term to fwd to a nextel since it's free inbound but having a cell
on the asterisk box is probably a better fit. Besides on a biz plan w/
tmobile and others
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 4:20 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phones, bluetooth and general happiness
> It's close -- it still requires an FXO port, and is probably not
> inexpensive itself. So between the FXO port and the device, you're
> p
> cell-socket. I'd prefer a bluetooth dongle (1) because of cost, and (2)
Wouldn't it be cheaper a cell-socket + a 30 u$s phone? (how much does a
bluetooth capable phone cost?)
Saludos,
HoraPe
---
Horacio J. Peña
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 12:22 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phones, bluetooth and
> general happiness
>
>
> Our prayersanswered? (http://www.phonelabs.com/prd_blue01.asp)
>
&g
Our prayersanswered? (http://www.phonelabs.com/prd_blue01.asp)
mitchel
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:10:11 -0500, Jay Milk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I installed my first home-PBX three years ago, I was looking at
> "cellsockets" -- devices which will accept certain cellular phones and
> pro
Jay Milk wrote:
Wait... So VZW offers this free nationwide plan but you can't use it? I
think they'd have a difficult time slapping you with a fine just because
you happened to only make/receive calls at home/work for a while.
That's another good reason to move away from Verizon.
Hey, calm down...
etter...
Regards,
Robert.
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Milk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 12:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phones,
--Original Message-
> From: Andrew Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 3:57 PM
> To: Joe Antkowiak; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
> Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phones, bluetooth and
> general happiness
>
>
Joe Antkowiak wrote:
if you bought a 2 phone no-minute plan with unlimited mobile to
mobile, and used * to connect one of your phones to your unlimited ld
at home, you could essentially get very cheap unlimited mobile
calling... this was the point I was trying to make... Yes, it
would be a pain
This has been discussed numerous times an gone no where. I agree
though, having my cell line ring my Asterisk extension would be ideal.
That way I only have to lug one phone when I'm home. Question
though, would chan_btp interfere with such a contraption?
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:24:18 -0500, Ja
ooth handsfree in
> the car, and
> > it's sweet -- no more missed calls due leaving the phone on vibrate.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:33 PM
> > T
Joe Antkowiak wrote:
There are quite a number of positive (for end users) implications of
doing this too... just think about all those cell providers that
offer unlimited mobile to mobile calls, and then all those unlimited
LD packages from landline and voip providers. This has huge potential
for
This is a great idea, I've got that phone and it really would be an
amazing feature, I have a really nice asterisk system set up in my
house and a $10/month broadvoice line, but linking everything together
would definately be a really nice touch. I've got $15 towards a bounty
;).
mitchel
On Thu,
On 23/09/2004 at 13:36 Joe Antkowiak wrote:
>There are quite a number of positive (for end users) implications of
>doing this too... just think about all those cell providers that
>offer unlimited mobile to mobile calls, and then all those unlimited
>LD packages from landline and voip providers.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:33 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phones, bluetooth and general
> happiness
>
> Interesting
>
> We use primicell&
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:33 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phones, bluetooth and general
happiness
Interesting
We use primicell's (nokia 22'
There are quite a number of positive (for end users) implications of
doing this too... just think about all those cell providers that
offer unlimited mobile to mobile calls, and then all those unlimited
LD packages from landline and voip providers. This has huge potential
for people who use their
Interesting
We use primicell's (nokia 22's) to break
out mobile phone traffic at the office. I know these are more like full
blown mobile phones that u plug directly into the pbx but similar idea.
Would be cool to have a home version to allow u to get similar functionality
by just putting yo
28 matches
Mail list logo
