IL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>
>Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 3:28 AM
>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues >> try an Ag-168 ?
>
>
>> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:01:17 +1100, Adam Goryachev wrot
riday, December 31, 2004 3:28 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues >> try an Ag-168 ?
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:01:17 +1100, Adam Goryachev wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 08:00 +1000, Gary wrote:
> >> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:34:24 -0500, Jim V
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:01:17 +1100, Adam Goryachev wrote:
>On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 08:00 +1000, Gary wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:34:24 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>>
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> Paul Fielding wrote:
>> >>> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 08:00 +1000, Gary wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:34:24 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Paul Fielding wrote:
> >>> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the
> >>> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:34:24 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Paul Fielding wrote:
>>> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the
>>> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be
>>> addressed.
>>>
>>> In my opinion, Digium needs
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:11:06 -0600, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
>Paul Fielding wrote:
>> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the
>> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be addressed.
>>
>> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Paul Fielding wrote:
>> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the
>> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be
>> addressed.
>>
>> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole
>> provisioning via cli thing.
Paul Fielding wrote:
Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the
issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be addressed.
In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole
provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI oriented
pi
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 6:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Gary wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:12:51 -0700, Paul Fielding wrote:
>I've
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Gary wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:12:51 -0700, Paul Fielding wrote:
>
> >I've just picked up a pair of IAXy devices. They work fine except that they
> >keep going offline. As in, I plug it in, it connects to Asterisk, I can
> >dial and phone and all is dandy. Then,
Paul Fielding wrote:
I've just picked up a pair of IAXy devices. They work fine except
that they keep going offline. As in, I plug it in, it connects to
Asterisk, I can dial and phone and all is dandy. Then, maybe 12h
later, maybe 24, maybe 36, maybe 48, I'll either try to phone the
device a
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:12:51 -0700, Paul Fielding wrote:
>I've just picked up a pair of IAXy devices. They work fine except that they
>keep going offline. As in, I plug it in, it connects to Asterisk, I can
>dial and phone and all is dandy. Then, maybe 12h later, maybe 24, maybe 36,
>maybe 4
12 matches
Mail list logo
