PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 11:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Ouch, part reset, quickly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 21, 2004 08:29 am, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
5 Watts per FXS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Critchfield Sent: Saturday, 4 December 2004 1:44 AM
To: Ed Greenberg; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Ouch, part
: [Asterisk-Users] Ouch, part reset, quickly
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 09:09 -0800, Ed Greenberg wrote:
I have exactly this problem. When it happens, I lose access to some
FXS ports and get Geiger counter style clicking on the FXOs. I just
opened a ticket with Digium on the subject, but given what I
On December 21, 2004 08:29 am, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
5 Watts per FXS
They also told me each FXS port would support a REN (ringer equivalence
number) of 5.0, which means that you should be able to to ring five of
the old electromechanical telephones simultaneously off of each FXS port
on
On December 21, 2004 08:29 am, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
5 Watts per FXS
They also told me each FXS port would support a REN (ringer equivalence
number) of 5.0, which means that you should be able to to ring five of
the old electromechanical telephones simultaneously off of each FXS port
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 21, 2004 08:29 am, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
5 Watts per FXS
They also told me each FXS port would support a REN (ringer
equivalence number) of 5.0, which means that you should be able to
to ring five of the old electromechanical telephones simultaneously
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 21, 2004 08:29 am, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
5 Watts per FXS
They also told me each FXS port would support a REN (ringer
equivalence number) of 5.0, which means that you should be able to
to ring five of the old electromechanical telephones simultaneously
On December 3, 2004 1:04 pm, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On December 3, 2004 12:43 pm, Steven Critchfield wrote:
Is it possible that your PSU isn't up to the task? If you aren't running
a 400 or 500 watt PSU, I would be suspect of the PSU. That error message
was attributed to not getting enough
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 08:31:15AM -0500, Michael George wrote:
On December 3, 2004 1:04 pm, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On December 3, 2004 12:43 pm, Steven Critchfield wrote:
Is it possible that your PSU isn't up to the task? If you aren't running
a 400 or 500 watt PSU, I would be suspect
On December 4, 2004 12:59 am, Dinesh Nair wrote:
i've debugged the driver well enough and know that the Ouch message happens
when register 0x08 of the module returns 0, which indicates in most times
that digital loopback is enabled on the card. this register is set to
/disable/ digital
i've debugged the driver well enough and know that the Ouch message happens
when register 0x08 of the module returns 0, which indicates in most times
that digital loopback is enabled on the card. this register is set to
/disable/ digital loopback upon an init.
the power alarm happens
On December 3, 2004 10:33 am, Garry Taylor wrote:
Ouch, part reset, quickly restoring reality (0)
Power alarm on module 1, resetting!
I have looked though a lot of email on this issue, and no one seems to have
the answer.
How many people are seeing this on a TDM400 card?
I would imagine
I have exactly this problem. When it happens, I lose access to some FXS
ports and get Geiger counter style clicking on the FXOs. I just opened a
ticket with Digium on the subject, but given what I just read, perhaps I
should not have high hopes.
/edg
--On Friday, December 03, 2004 11:33 PM
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 09:09 -0800, Ed Greenberg wrote:
I have exactly this problem. When it happens, I lose access to some FXS
ports and get Geiger counter style clicking on the FXOs. I just opened a
ticket with Digium on the subject, but given what I just read, perhaps I
should not have
I have exactly this problem. When it happens, I lose access to some FXS
ports and get Geiger counter style clicking on the FXOs. I just opened a
ticket with Digium on the subject, but given what I just read, perhaps I
should not have high hopes.
Kinda same with me; although on some of my FXS
On December 3, 2004 12:43 pm, Steven Critchfield wrote:
Is it possible that your PSU isn't up to the task? If you aren't running
a 400 or 500 watt PSU, I would be suspect of the PSU. That error message
was attributed to not getting enough power before they put a power plug
on the board itself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steven Critchfield
Sent: Saturday, 4 December 2004 1:44 AM
To: Ed Greenberg; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Ouch, part reset, quickly
On 04/12/2004 00:00 Andrew Kohlsmith said the following:
On December 3, 2004 10:33 am, Garry Taylor wrote:
Ouch, part reset, quickly restoring reality (0)
Power alarm on module 1, resetting!
I have looked though a lot of email on this issue, and no one seems to have
the answer.
How many people are
18 matches
Mail list logo
