At 12:50 9/23/2005, you wrote:
> Good luck! Soundpoint phones, in my opinion, are worth every second
> spent setting them up.
I was able to get it the ip500 working with asterisk on three lines
and it's a beautiful phone for the $200 or so I paid for it. I'll bet
the remaining ip500's will be av
> Good luck! Soundpoint phones, in my opinion, are worth every second
> spent setting them up.
I was able to get it the ip500 working with asterisk on three lines
and it's a beautiful phone for the $200 or so I paid for it. I'll bet
the remaining ip500's will be available fairly cheap too, with th
On 9/22/05, Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's best for you to set up an ftp server instead of a tftp server, but
> I don't think you'll enjoy setting up a soundpoint phone without either
> of them. The Polycom Phones page in the wiki was pretty much all I
> needed to
After dealing with a Poly 301 I rather use the FTP server and config
files, even for a single phone,
download the manual and stuff from freedomphones.net/polycom
Tom Vile wrote:
but you do not get all of the features via a web browser to customize.
On 9/22/05, *Tom Hayden* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but you do not get all of the features via a web browser to customize.On 9/22/05, Tom Hayden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Huh? You can easily configure an IP500 via a web browser. Just pointthe URL to the IP addr of the telephone.
--Tom HaydenOn 9/22/05, Wilson Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hi,
Huh? You can easily configure an IP500 via a web browser. Just point
the URL to the IP addr of the telephone.
--
Tom Hayden
On 9/22/05, Wilson Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just got my ip500 back after months of waiting. Is there an easy way
> to get it hooked up to asterisk wit
It's best for you to set up an ftp server instead of a tftp server, but
I don't think you'll enjoy setting up a soundpoint phone without either
of them. The Polycom Phones page in the wiki was pretty much all I
needed to set mine up:
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Polycom+Phones
Cody Lerum wrote:
Can I just pull unchanged lines out?
No. Many of the 'defaults' are only defaults because they are in the
sample configuration files, and if you upload new files that don't have
the defaults, the features will not work the same way (or at all). I
have personally seen Call
sip show register will display the sip registrations the server has
performed to other peers, not other peers to it
this is also true for iax
not sure why you split the registrations into 2 instead of using
friend, friend works fine for me and I have not heard of any issues
of using it for
Joe and Charlie,
YES, that fixed the problem. I did move the whole network to G729 but
it was never a codec problem.
I'm not running CVS, it's 1.0.3 at the moment.
Thanks
Scott H
Joe Baptista wrote:
On May 2, 2005 10:31 am, Charlie Watts wrote:
I'm using ulaw, but seeing this problem as well.
A
On May 2, 2005 10:31 am, Charlie Watts wrote:
> I'm using ulaw, but seeing this problem as well.
>
> Are you using CVS? I would swear it didn't do this to me in earlier tests,
> but it is doing it now. I will try to track down the specific change
> tonight ...
>
> My solution for now is to Answer()
I'm using ulaw, but seeing this problem as well.
Are you using CVS? I would swear it didn't do this to me in earlier tests, but
it is doing it now. I will try to track down the specific change tonight ...
My solution for now is to Answer() the call before dialing out. I changed all
of my outbou
Paul Hales wrote:
It now works - but only in the latest (1.5+) firmware releases.
Where are the 1.5 releases? I see only 1.4.1 on all the Polycom sites.
Regards,
Richard
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.
: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 - Phone TIme
Paul Hales wrote:
> And my dreamthat one day Polycom phones will support Australian Daylight
> savings...
>
> But it's only a dream.
Unless I am missing something, you don't need to dream about it - set it in
ipmid
Paul Hales wrote:
And my dreamthat one day Polycom phones will support Australian Daylight savings...
But it's only a dream.
Unless I am missing something, you don't need to dream about it - set it
in ipmid.cfg.
Look at the Sip Admim PDF for an explanation of:
tcpIpApp.sntp.daylightSaving
List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 - Phone TIme
We set ours through the web interface on the phone
Here is what we use for Phoenix.
tcpIpApp.sntp.daylightSavings.enable="0" tcpIpApp.sntp.gmtOffset="-25200"
tcpIpApp.sntp.address=&q
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Morin
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:25 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 - Phone TIme
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Morin
Sen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Morin
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:17 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 - Phone TIme
>> Wiley Siler wrote:
>&
>> Wiley Siler wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyoe know where I can set the timezone in the configuration
files?
>>>
>>> I am in Phoenix, AZ which has a GMT offset of -7 hours but when I
enter
>>> this into the gmt fields in ipmid.cfg nothing seems to happen.
>>>
>>> Here are the fields...
>>> tcpIpApp.sntp.
s.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 - Phone TIme
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
> Wiley Siler wrote:
>
>> Does anyoe know where I can set the timezone in the configuration
files?
>>
>> I am in Phoenix, AZ which has a GMT offset of -7 hours but when I
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
Wiley Siler wrote:
Does anyoe know where I can set the timezone in the configuration files?
I am in Phoenix, AZ which has a GMT offset of -7 hours but when I enter
this into the gmt fields in ipmid.cfg nothing seems to happen.
Here are the fields...
tcpIpApp.sntp.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Wiley Siler
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 12:55 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 - Phone T
Polycom set... There you go!
Thanks,
Wiley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wiley
Siler
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 - Phone TIme
Wiley Siler wrote:
> Does anyoe know where I can set the timezone in the configuration
files?
>
> I am in Phoenix, AZ which has a GMT offset of -7 hours but when I
> enter this into the gmt fields in ipmid.cfg nothing seems to happen.
>
> H
I've only programmed my IP500 through the web interface. On the web
interface, I set the "GMT Offset" to -6 (for Central). It
works for me. BTW, I'm using pool.ntg.org as my sntp server.
Now what doesn't work, is that when I change something in the web
interface and the phone reboots, the tim
Wiley Siler wrote:
Does anyoe know where I can set the timezone in the configuration files?
I am in Phoenix, AZ which has a GMT offset of -7 hours but when I enter
this into the gmt fields in ipmid.cfg nothing seems to happen.
Here are the fields...
tcpIpApp.sntp.address="" tcpIpApp.sntp.gmtOffset
Make sure the address is the same as the userid, IE
reg.X.auth.userId="username" and reg.X.address="username"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Sean Kennedy
Sent: Mon 4/25/2005 9:11 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-
Dan Morin wrote:
I just got a few Polycom IP500s and I’ve been following the info in
the wiki trying to configure them. From what I can tell, they seem to
be setup correctly (well…they don’t work so obviously not…) however,
when they try to register with Asterisk, the following error shows up
i
Here is that Part:
--
Seshu
Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote:
> Does anyone know how Polycom 500s will be able to update the
Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote:
Does anyone know how Polycom 500s will be able to update their time.
My setup for a time sync with Public domain Time servers is not
successful.
We set the NTP server and timezone using ISC DHCPd.
option ntp-servers 172.16.7.1;
option time-offset
Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote:
Does anyone know how Polycom 500s will be able to update their time. My
setup for a time sync with Public domain Time servers is not successful.
Seshu
We had a user with a Sonic Wall Firewall who needed to set the snpt
server to the IP address of his firewal
If the time is off by exactly x hours, check the *timezone* in ipmid.cfg.
On 4/14/05, Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone know how Polycom 500s will be able to update their time. My
> setup for a time sync with Public domain Time servers is not successful.
Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote:
Does anyone know how Polycom 500s will be able to update their time.
My setup for a time sync with Public domain Time servers is not
successful.
Seshu
Can you look for the sntp entry in your ipmid.cfg file and post it in
it's entirety?
Sean
_
Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote:
Does anyone know how Polycom 500s will be able to update their time. My
setup for a time sync with Public domain Time servers is not successful.
Seshu
NOTICE: If received in error, pl
rs Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
Tim Jackson wrote:
>Copied your sip.conf and changed the settings and I'm getting the exact
>same error. I'm also running 1.3.4 of the SIP app for the IP500.
>
>
Someone has already poi
="Unknown caller" <>
> group = 1
> channel => 3-4
>
>
> -Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrei
> (MPI)
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 11:08 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List
Tim Jackson wrote:
Copied your sip.conf and changed the settings and I'm getting the exact
same error. I'm also running 1.3.4 of the SIP app for the IP500.
Someone has already pointed out that you might have ran into a network
problem. What's the network setup between phone and the server?
As
known caller" <>
group = 1
channel => 3-4
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrei
(MPI)
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 11:08 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] P
risk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
FROM MY SIP.CONF
[1000]
type=friend
host=dynamic
context=local
allow=ulaw
secret=YESITIS
callerid="Front Desk" <1000>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dtmfmode=rfc2833
nat=0
FROM MY EXTENSION.CONF
[
Inbound calls ring, but you
can't answer them, registration seems to be ok, but I'm at a loss.
Had this same behavior with IP500s last
week. For us, the solution was NAT related. Our server is on the LAN with
the phones, but I was doing 1-1 NAT of an IP on the outside to the server.
I changed t
Tim,
For what it's worth, from my working sip.conf for Polycoms:
[2010]
type=friend
username=usr2010
callerid="MyName" <2010>
secret=nobodyknowswhatitis
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=inband
context=admin
defaultip=192.168.1.10
progressinband=no
Notes:
dtmfmode=inband and progressinband=no - that seems to b
Noah Miller wrote:
I guess the phone just doesn't register as busy when there is only one
call on a line. It has to have two calls on a line appearance to
register as busy. Has anyone figured out how to disable this hold
feature and just have the second call go to the second line, the third
c
---Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Jackson
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 7:54 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
They were updated, to reflect the new card. And I can
: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
How about your zapata.conf and zaptel.conf files? Were they updated for
the new card?
W
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Jackson
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 12:09 AM
To: asterisk-users
How about your zapata.conf and zaptel.conf files? Were they updated for
the new card?
W
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Jackson
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 12:09 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Po
I have these very phones and took me a while to figure this out myself.
The phone considers each line registration to be a line with a second
line. So, call line while someone is on a call and another instance
will appear below. That means you only need one registered instance
for the phones to
http://www.freedomphones.net/polycom/files/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 4:14 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
Does anyone h
--On Monday, December 06, 2004 7:11 AM -0600 Rich Adamson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only way to get firmware from Polycom (their policy, not mine) is to
become a certified reseller.
Check the asterisk archives as someone has posted a site several times
with current firmware. Its probably i
> Does anyone have a location to download the latest Polycom firmware etc?
> Other than the extranet site, because I am not a reseller, there fore I
> have no login.
>
> [minirant]
> And shouldn't end users be granted access to this kind of thing anyway?
> Geeze
> [/minirant]
Found the same thin
ndrei
(MPI)
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 10:51 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
Hello Tim,
You are saying that: phone is on "10.24.102.0/24" and Asterisk resides
on "10.24.100.0/24". Honestly, I see
e-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrei
> >(MPI)
> >Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 10:51 AM
> >To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> >Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
> >
> >Hell
se.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrei
(MPI)
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 10:51 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
Hello Tim,
You are saying that: phone is on "
ssion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
Hello Tim,
You are saying that: phone is on "10.24.102.0/24" and Asterisk resides
on "10.24.100.0/24". Honestly, I see at least one hop forwarding here
and possible network issues right away.
At one moment, not in a NAT environ
em. Any other ideas?
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrei
(MPI)
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
Tim,
You may see description
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
Tim,
I've experienced routing problems before where I could dial a phone on a
different subnet and I could hear them,
but they couldn't hear me. Is it possible that the phone "learns" the
route,
nes to a router that knows about all of my
subnets, instead of my internet gateway.
Ty
-Original Message-
From: Tim Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 9:07 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polyc
esday, December 01, 2004 11:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
Tim,
You may see description of new 1.3.4 firmware at polycom.com (check -
http://www.polycom.com/common/pw_cmp_updateDocKeywords/0,1687,3641,00.pd
f
) releas
Rich Adamson wrote:
...
Thought that was really funny since the 500's were ordered from a reseller
"with SIP image", and the reseller never even bothered to include a
CD or url.
...
Yes, that's a fact. You were lucky he knew what exactly he was selling.
I could tell more horror stories as I was
> You may see description of new 1.3.4 firmware at polycom.com (check -
> http://www.polycom.com/common/pw_cmp_updateDocKeywords/0,1687,3641,00.pdf
> ) released in October.
>
> Though, it was proven over time that troubles with a SIP phone like "not
> hearing" one side or the other is NAT rela
;Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
Any idea if 1.34 makes Daylight Savings work for us people in Australia?
PaulH
-Original Message-
From: Andrei (MPI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 2 December 2004 9:30 A
01, 2004 6:00 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500
Any idea if 1.34 makes Daylight Savings work for us people in Australia?
PaulH
-Original Message-
From: Andrei (MPI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: T
Any idea if 1.34 makes Daylight Savings work for us people in Australia?
PaulH
-Original Message-
From: Andrei (MPI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 2 December 2004 9:30 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom
Hi Chris,
First of all, you need to configure ftp or tftp and watch syslog
closely - what the phone is looking for at boot time. You would need to
put config files into (t)ftp directory, named according to MAC address
of you phone. XML and Web is really weird - they do not even share same
conf
Nevermind, I had to upgrade to 1.4.2 first then 1.5
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Marlowe
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1:17 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP
I have two IP 500's on my Asterisk PBX. The IM features just kinda
worked, without any extra configuration. Messenging and presense.
I've heard of folks trying to interface this functionality with MSN
Messenger and such, without much success. Can't help you much there.
- Jeff
On Fri, 17 Sep
Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 11:32 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 vs Cisco 7940
The Polycom IP500s do support customized ringtones and can use a
customized
ALERT_INFO for all of them. One thing that is worth noting
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 vs Cisco 7940
In July I bought one from CDW for $280.75.
Ty
-Original Message-
From: hank smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 2:04 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non
In July I bought one from CDW for $280.75.
Ty
-Original Message-
From: hank smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 2:04 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 vs Cisco 7940
what is the price
what is the price range in us dollars?
- Original Message -
From: "Jody N. Rudolph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 11:32 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Us
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Laird
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 1:06 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 vs Cisco 7940
On Sep 9, 2004, at 9:53 AM, Matt G wrote:
>
On Sep 9, 2004, at 9:53 AM, Matt G wrote:
I've been asked to determine which phones our organization should go
with. And I've narrowed it down to the Polycom IP500 or the Cisco
7940.
From my travels through google, it's hard to find a definitive
comparison of the two phones. So I thought I woul
71 matches
Mail list logo
