Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-10 Thread hank smith
on Asterisk Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Andy Powell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 9:13 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura On Fri

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-10 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote: > However, you could use VMware on an Intel notebook to run both Windoze > and Linux concurrently. This wouldn't be ideal for a real PBX for > performance reasons, but since all you are going to use Asterisk for > is to be a gateway fo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-10 Thread John Kington
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:52:56 -0400, John Kington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about sip softphones that use STUN? I am especially interested in UK > because my daughter is going to study in London. At 02:23 AM 9/10/2004 +0900, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If she is going to be on a residenti

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-10 Thread hank smith
t;'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 6:34 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura I run Asterisk on Redhat 8.0 with a VM hosted by Microsoft's Virtual PC which, in turn, runs on Windows 2000 S

RE: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-10 Thread Bill Seddon
ED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:05:09 +0200, Andy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At the risk of stating the obvious if you have a laptop not running MacOSX (ie perhaps running windows) download my asterisk live! cd ( http://www.automated.it/asterisk

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-10 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:05:09 +0200, Andy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At the risk of stating the obvious if you have a laptop not running MacOSX (ie > perhaps running windows) download my asterisk live! cd ( > http://www.automated.it/asterisk/ ), burn it and test it on your laptop and

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-10 Thread Andy Powell
On 07/09/2004 at 23:57 Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote: >On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 08:14:57 -0500, Brian Capouch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: >> If you have a Linux laptop with you, then in fact the SIP devices can be >> configured to "hide" behind it. The laptop can then run an instance of >>

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-09 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:52:56 -0400, John Kington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about sip softphones that use STUN? I am especially interested in UK > because my daughter is going to study in London. If she is going to be on a residential ADSL, that shouldn't be a problem. I have friends in the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-09 Thread John Kington
At 09:54 PM 9/7/2004 +0900, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For travelling, no SIP based device will be "configure and forget". Perhaps if you travel only within the US, you may be lucky most of the time but pretty much anywhere else where IP addresses are scarce you

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 08:06:18 +0800, Leo Ann Boon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote: > > >I have been travelling a lot on all inhabited continents, using hotel > >provided internet connections, internet cafes, client's office LANs, > >hotspots in public places

RE: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Brian West
To: Lyle Giese > Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura > > On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:40:00 -0500, Lyle Giese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hmmm, I thought 56k modems were 56k outbound only and maxs at 33

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:40:00 -0500, Lyle Giese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmm, I thought 56k modems were 56k outbound only and maxs at 33k inbound > or did the standard change again when I wasn't looking? > > And besides when did you get better than 28.8 through a hotel PBX? >33k > with a 56k m

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 19:13:34 -0600, Rich Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Believe or not, I've been using a snom 200 configured with nat and haven't found > any US locations where it doesn't work with a couple of exceptions. Read my post again and you will find that I was talking about locatio

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Rich Adamson
> > I need a cheap simple adaptor for analog phones to use with Asterisk. It > > should be some kind of "configure and forget" type of device, to use at > > the office, or just throw it in a road warrior's bag and use it while > > travelling, to call back to the "mothership" > > For travelling, no

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Leo Ann Boon
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote: I have been travelling a lot on all inhabited continents, using hotel provided internet connections, internet cafes, client's office LANs, hotspots in public places, cafes, airports etc etc. The most common experience is "SIP doesn't work at all" and the se

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Scott Lykens
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:40:00 -0500, Lyle Giese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmm, I thought 56k modems were 56k outbound only and maxs at 33k inbound > or did the standard change again when I wasn't looking? > > And besides when did you get better than 28.8 through a hotel PBX? >33k > with a 56k m

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Lyle Giese
Message - From: "Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 12:51 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura > On Tue, 07 Sep 2

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 10:31:58 -0700, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would iaxy work over a plain dialup connection? 56k? 33k? > (assuming the bandwidth is fine between the ISP and the location of the > Asterisk server) The IAXy supports ADPCM which is 32k. Considering the IP overhead yo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Eric Wieling
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 12:31, Florin Andrei wrote: > Would iaxy work over a plain dialup connection? 56k? 33k? > (assuming the bandwidth is fine between the ISP and the location of the > Asterisk server) No. The IAXy supports only G711 and ADPCM or G726 (I don't recall which). Both take MUCH more

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Florin Andrei
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 05:57, Michael Bielicki wrote: > the only problem you will have whilst travelling with the iaxy is that > it supports only bandwidth hungry codecs. so if you are anywhere in the > world where bandwidth is a problem, the iaxy is a nogo Would iaxy work over a plain dialup conne

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 08:14:57 -0500, Brian Capouch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you have a Linux laptop with you, then in fact the SIP devices can be > configured to "hide" behind it. The laptop can then run an instance of > asterisk that connects to the "home" asterisk server, Like I said: I r

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Brian Capouch
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote: On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 22:35:46 -0700, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I need a cheap simple adaptor for analog phones to use with Asterisk. It should be some kind of "configure and forget" type of device, to use at the office, or just throw it in a r

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Michael Bielicki
the only problem you will have whilst travelling with the iaxy is that it supports only bandwidth hungry codecs. so if you are anywhere in the world where bandwidth is a problem, the iaxy is a nogo On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 14:54, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote: > On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 22:35:4

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 22:35:46 -0700, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need a cheap simple adaptor for analog phones to use with Asterisk. It > should be some kind of "configure and forget" type of device, to use at > the office, or just throw it in a road warrior's bag and use it while >

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-07 Thread Todd Lieberman
Florin Andrei wrote: I need a cheap simple adaptor for analog phones to use with Asterisk. It should be some kind of "configure and forget" type of device, to use at the office, or just throw it in a road warrior's bag and use it while travelling, to call back to the "mothership". I can't decide be