On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 03:54:49PM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
> Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> >What's the common value for that number, and secondarily, does Asterisk
> >support the traditional #-cutthrough to signify that you're done
> >dialling, as LEC switches generally always have?
>
> Yo
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:42:32AM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
My problem with this type of dialplan is that users must wait for
DigitTimeout before the call is processed.
I was going to ask about that.
What's the common value for that number, and secondarily,
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:42:32AM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
> My problem with this type of dialplan is that users must wait for
> DigitTimeout before the call is processed.
I was going to ask about that.
What's the common value for that number, and secondarily, does Asterisk
support
Naija Man wrote:
As a habit, I do not force users to dial 9 or any other prefix of any
kind
to access external lines. You can just check the dialled number and prefix
with appropriate digits appropriately. See below. NOTE: THIS IS
US-CENTRIC!!
but can be easily made to work for any country.
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Matthew Thompson wrote:
> In the UK we have 6,7,8, and 11 digit local dialling and 8, 10 and 11
> digit national dialling.
You forgot 5 digit local numbering ;-)
A town near me has 5-digit local numbers, my town has 6 digit local
numbers and we both have the same 5-digit "STD
On 1 Oct 2006, at 04:54, Naija Man wrote:As a habit, I do not force users to dial 9 or any other prefix of any kind to access external lines. You can just check the dialled number and prefix with appropriate digits appropriately. See below. NOTE: THIS IS US-CENTRIC!! but can be easily made to work
-- Forwarded message --From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comDate: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:35:49 -0400
Subject: [asterisk-users] Dial-9 (was Extension Numbering)
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 01:40:09PM +0100, Gordon Henderson wrote:> Here in the UK,
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 10:39:09PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > I know that this has been a problem for traditional PBXen for years,
> > and the only solution I've ever been able to see is "use 8 as your
> > outdial prefix"... but no one seems to ever do that, even 20 years on.
> >
> > Is this
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 01:40:09PM +0100, Gordon Henderson wrote:
> > Here in the UK, I've installed several small systems without a dial-9 for
> > an outside line type thing. The outside line prefix is effectively digit
> > zero. (
On 30 Sep 2006, at 19:35, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
I know that this has been a problem for traditional PBXen for years,
and the only solution I've ever been able to see is "use 8 as your
outdial prefix"... but no one seems to ever do that, even 20 years on.
Never say no one. Our legacy PBX is s
10 matches
Mail list logo
