Thanks Steve, it was helpful to read your post. Neither Digium or
Sangoma single span cards have built in E/C, I´m wrong? To get one with
this feature enable is completely out of my budget; since it is no for
commercial use. I hope I wont have echo problems or they can be solve by
means of soft
On 10/20/06, R.R. Libera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow, this is a completely neutral and very valuable review. Thanks a lot
Zoa.
I´m an * newbie; my little box will only needs 20 extensions to give
termination to remote users and I´m about to buy a PRI interface; I
decide to get Sangoma hardwar
Cheers,
>
> Zoa.
>
> Dovid B wrote:
>> Can I now 5th it ? All this makes me wonder why Digium dosent work
>> harder. I have mainly only seen others praise Sangoma over Digium.
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> *From:* Tom Vile <mailto:[EMAIL
k-users@lists.digium.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 18, 2006 4:22 PM
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] considering purchasing a t1
card,any recommendations?
I 4th it.
On 10/18/06, *Matthew Thompson* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Conrad Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 22:39 +0200, Dovid B wrote:
Can I now 5th it ? All this makes me wonder why Digium dosent work
harder. I have mainly only seen others praise Sangoma over Digium.
I strongly suspect digium is painfully aware of the problems with some
combinati
18, 2006 4:22 PM
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] considering purchasing a t1
card,any recommendations?
I 4th it.
On 10/18/06, *Matthew Thompson* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
On 17 Oct 2006, at 22:09, Richard wrote:
I woul
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 22:39 +0200, Dovid B wrote:
> Can I now 5th it ? All this makes me wonder why Digium dosent work
> harder. I have mainly only seen others praise Sangoma over Digium.
I strongly suspect digium is painfully aware of the problems with some
combinations of mboards and their card
:22
PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] considering
purchasing a t1 card,any recommendations?
I 4th it.
On 10/18/06, Matthew
Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 17 Oct 2006, at 22:09, Richard wrote:
I would have
to second the Sangoma buy.
I 4th it.On 10/18/06, Matthew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 17 Oct 2006, at 22:09, Richard wrote: I would have to second the Sangoma buy. Their tech support is second to none and more then helpful.
I've never had any problems with their products that wasn't my own fault.
Thirded - I'v
On 17 Oct 2006, at 22:09, Richard wrote: I would have to second the Sangoma buy. Their tech support is second to none and more then helpful. I've never had any problems with their products that wasn't my own fault. Thirded - I've just done another install with a Sangoma A102 - the setup guides y
Richard wrote:
I would have to second the Sangoma buy. Their tech support is second to
none and more then helpful.
I've never had any problems with their products that wasn't my own fault.
You do have to be careful with Sangoma. We recently had a Digium 4-Port
T-1 card blow up. The
I would have to second the Sangoma buy. Their tech support
is second to none and more then helpful.
I've never had any problems with their products that wasn't my own
fault.
/R
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
KennedySent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1
The Sangoma certainly has better support, a longer warranty, and works
with " all modern motherboards" according to the manufacturer
I do know first hand that Sangoma support doesn't say "try another
motherboard"
I just got an A200 working remotely. Though their installation
instructions leave a
13 matches
Mail list logo