On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:12:30 +0900, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:50:39 -0400, steve szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't use PPTP as a security solution, because it really isn't. It's so
flawed you can even connect to it without having ANY encryption.
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Use OpenSwan http://www.openswan.org
I use OpenVPN http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/, and am very happy
with it. It's easy to set up, but extremely powerful and flexible.
Unlike Swan, which is Linux only, OpenVPN runs on Linux, the
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:30:51 +0200, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Use OpenSwan http://www.openswan.org
I use OpenVPN http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/
As far as I know OpenVPN is not IPsec and thereby non-standard.
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as I know OpenVPN is not IPsec and thereby non-standard.
Oh, absolutely. I never claimed it adhered to any standard. It just
does one heck of a great job implementing a VPN solution with lots of
useful features, and
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:10:23 +0200, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as I know OpenVPN is not IPsec and thereby non-standard.
Oh, absolutely. I never claimed it adhered to any standard.
But you made it sound
I'm using vtun - I think it's just the best choice for secure tunnels :)
http://vtun.sourceforge.net/
It supports both TCP and UDP connection - you decide what to use
Lubo
-
Appradius Project: RADIUS authentication and accounting support for
Asterisk PBX
http://appradius.minitelecom.org/
As far as I know OpenVPN is not IPsec and thereby non-standard.
Oh, absolutely. I never claimed it adhered to any standard.
But you made it sound as if it had cross-platform advantages over
OpenSwan which I believe to have been misleading -- not intentionally
of course -- because
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: {SPAM?} [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk VIA SSH Tunnels
I've been running ssh tunnels for a couple of years now. For years,
they've worked well. However, now that I've got asterisk up I do
notice problems. Biggest indication of this is if I'm on a call
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:13:04 -0700, Geoff Nordli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenVPN runs on: Linux, Windows 2000/XP and higher, OpenBSD, FreeBSD,
NetBSD, Mac OS X, and Solaris.
And how many routers and firewalls out there do support OpenVPN? Do
Cisco routers support it?
On the other hand, IPsec
This is not an endorsement of any methodology, just a few points:
1) CIPE though non-standard, uses a UDP-based transport. Therefore it
can be used to tunnel just about anything, and can be used for VPN
servers, though probably not routers.
2) CIPE is lighter-weight than IPSec. However, the
On Thursday 14 October 2004 03:04 pm, Geoff Nordli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:13:04 -0700, Geoff Nordli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenVPN runs on: Linux, Windows 2000/XP and higher, OpenBSD,
FreeBSD, NetBSD, Mac OS X, and Solaris.
And how many routers and
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:50:39 -0400, steve szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't use PPTP as a security solution, because it really isn't. It's so
flawed you can even connect to it without having ANY encryption. Microsoft
with their never ending wisdom have incorporated design flaws that
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And how many routers and firewalls out there do support OpenVPN? Do
Cisco routers support it?
Neither I, nor anyone else here, seems to be saying that OpenVPN is a
replacement for IPsec. There's overlap, but there are applications
I've been running ssh tunnels for a couple of years now. For years,
they've worked well. However, now that I've got asterisk up I do
notice problems. Biggest indication of this is if I'm on a call and
run a program in another window that scrolls and scrolls call quality
drops off
Tom Neville wrote:
I've been running ssh tunnels for a couple of years now. For years,
they've worked well. However, now that I've got asterisk up I do
notice problems. Biggest indication of this is if I'm on a call and
run a program in another window that scrolls and scrolls call quality
Try to take a look to http://www.freeswan.org IPSEC tunnels. Them are streamed
on UDP port 500. May be it help?
Bye,
Marcello
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 18:01, Steve Underwood wrote:
Your tunnels worked well because yoou used TCP across them. Now you are
trying to stream UDP, and that works
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:53:14 +0200, Marcello Lupo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try to take a look to http://www.freeswan.org IPSEC tunnels
Don't use FreeSwan. It has been abandoned and dead for almost a year.
Use OpenSwan http://www.openswan.org
--
Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo
17 matches
Mail list logo
